• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险沟通对公众非常规恐怖主义行为的影响——随机对照试验

The Effect of Risk Communication on Public Behavior to Non-Conventional Terrorism-Randomized Control Trial.

机构信息

The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan 5262100, Israel.

The Department of Emergency & Disaster Management, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv-Yafo 6997801, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 29;19(1):342. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010342.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19010342
PMID:35010599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8751006/
Abstract

Non-conventional terrorism (NCT) incorporates an extended dimension of uncertainty that can lead to fear among the public. Health officials have an unsubstantiated assumption that thousands will seek treatment in hospitals following NCT. This study aims to examine public behavioral intentions in the case of NCT and the effect of risk communication on intents. An online randomized controlled trial was conducted among 1802 adult participants in Israel. Threat perception and behavioral intent before and after exposure to hypothetical NCT scenarios were assessed stratified to the type of media, exposure to rumors, and risk communication. The majority (~64%) of participants are aware of the NCT threat. Almost half (45%) of participants indicated a "high" or "very high" chance of seeking medical attention following an NCT incident. Regression analysis suggests that the odds of participants exposed to risk communication to report an elevated intent of seeking medical attention were 0.470 (95% CI: 0.359, 0.615) times that of participants not exposed to risk communication, χ = 30.366, < 0.001. The findings demonstrate the importance of effective risk communication in reducing undesired public behavior during NCT crises. Efforts must be invested to create a robust risk communication infrastructure to allow the proper management of possible NCT incidents.

摘要

非常规恐怖主义(NCT)包含了一个扩展的不确定性维度,可能会导致公众产生恐惧。卫生官员有一个未经证实的假设,即在 NCT 之后,将有成千上万的人到医院寻求治疗。本研究旨在探讨公众在 NCT 情况下的行为意图,以及风险沟通对意图的影响。在以色列,对 1802 名成年参与者进行了在线随机对照试验。根据媒体类型、谣言接触情况和风险沟通情况,对暴露于假设性 NCT 场景前后的威胁感知和行为意图进行分层评估。大多数(约 64%)参与者意识到 NCT 威胁。几乎一半(45%)的参与者表示,在发生 NCT 事件后,他们有“高”或“非常高”的可能性寻求医疗关注。回归分析表明,与未接触风险沟通的参与者相比,接触风险沟通的参与者报告寻求医疗关注的意愿增加的几率为 0.470(95% CI:0.359,0.615)倍,χ=30.366, <0.001。研究结果表明,在 NCT 危机期间,有效的风险沟通对于减少公众的不良行为非常重要。必须投入努力来建立一个强大的风险沟通基础设施,以允许对可能的 NCT 事件进行适当的管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff3/8751006/3a021ecccdbf/ijerph-19-00342-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff3/8751006/92ba9271dcdc/ijerph-19-00342-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff3/8751006/a86745904247/ijerph-19-00342-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff3/8751006/e3262827451f/ijerph-19-00342-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff3/8751006/3a021ecccdbf/ijerph-19-00342-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff3/8751006/92ba9271dcdc/ijerph-19-00342-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff3/8751006/a86745904247/ijerph-19-00342-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff3/8751006/e3262827451f/ijerph-19-00342-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff3/8751006/3a021ecccdbf/ijerph-19-00342-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Risk Communication on Public Behavior to Non-Conventional Terrorism-Randomized Control Trial.风险沟通对公众非常规恐怖主义行为的影响——随机对照试验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 29;19(1):342. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010342.
2
How to communicate with the public about chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear terrorism: a systematic review of the literature.如何就化学、生物、放射或核恐怖主义向公众进行沟通:文献系统综述
Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Dec;10(4):383-95. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0043. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
3
Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents?放射性物质释放的应急响应:我们是否已与应急响应人员群体进行了有效沟通,使其做好安全应对这些事件的准备?
Health Phys. 2018 Feb;114(2):208-213. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000757.
4
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
5
Effective media communication of disasters: pressing problems and recommendations.灾害的有效媒体沟通:紧迫问题与建议
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jun 6;7:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-97.
6
Communicating with the public following radiological terrorism: results from a series of focus groups and national surveys in Britain and Germany.放射性恐怖主义事件后的公众沟通:在英国和德国进行的一系列焦点小组和全国性调查的结果。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Apr;28(2):110-9. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12001756. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
7
Terrorism and dispelling the myth of a panic prone public.恐怖主义与消除公众易恐慌的神话
J Public Health Policy. 2006;27(3):219-45; discussion 246-9. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200083.
8
Fear of the Unknown: Does Fear of Terrorism Differ From Fear of Contracting COVID-19?对未知的恐惧:对恐怖主义的恐惧与对感染新冠病毒的恐惧有何不同?
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 11;12:660777. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660777. eCollection 2021.
9
Addressing the psychosocial and communication challenges posed by radiological/nuclear terrorism: key developments since NCRP Report No. 138.
Health Phys. 2005 Nov;89(5):521-30. doi: 10.1097/01.hp.0000172142.89475.d2.
10
Using efficacy cues in persuasive health communication is more effective than employing threats - An experimental study of a vaccination intervention against Ebola.在有说服力的健康传播中使用功效提示比使用威胁更有效——埃博拉疫苗接种干预的实验研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Sep;23(3):665-684. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12310. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Configurations for positive public behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis.针对 COVID-19 大流行采取积极公众行为的配置:模糊集定性比较分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 6;22(1):1692. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14097-6.
2
It Takes Two to Tango: How the COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign in Israel Was Framed by the Health Ministry vs. the Television News.《探戈双人舞:以色列卫生部与电视新闻对 COVID-19 疫苗接种运动的不同呈现》
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;10:887579. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.887579. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The Evolving Field of Risk Communication.风险沟通领域的发展演进。
Risk Anal. 2020 Nov;40(S1):2240-2262. doi: 10.1111/risa.13615. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
COVID-19-Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis.新冠疫情相关信息泛滥及其对公共卫生的影响:全球社交媒体分析。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Oct;103(4):1621-1629. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0812.
3
Impact of Rumors and Misinformation on COVID-19 in Social Media.社交媒体上谣言和错误信息对新冠疫情的影响。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2020 May;53(3):171-174. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.20.094. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
4
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being.新冠疫情和全国封锁对信任、对政府的态度和幸福感的影响。
Am Psychol. 2020 Jul-Aug;75(5):618-630. doi: 10.1037/amp0000662. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
5
Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: the critical role of trust in science.建模遵守 COVID-19 预防指南:对科学的信任的关键作用。
Psychol Health Med. 2021 Jan;26(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
Psychological underpinning of panic buying during pandemic (COVID-19).疫情(新冠肺炎)期间恐慌性购买的心理基础。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:113061. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113061. Epub 2020 May 6.
7
The anatomy of panic buying related to the current COVID-19 pandemic.与当前新冠疫情相关的恐慌性抢购剖析。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jun;288:113015. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113015. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
8
Regulation and Trust: 3-Month Follow-up Study on COVID-19 Mortality in 25 European Countries.监管与信任:25 个欧洲国家 COVID-19 死亡率的 3 个月随访研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 24;6(2):e19218. doi: 10.2196/19218.
9
Self-Isolation Compliance In The COVID-19 Era Influenced By Compensation: Findings From A Recent Survey In Israel.新冠疫情时代下的自我隔离遵从度受补偿影响:以色列近期调查结果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jun;39(6):936-941. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00382. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
10
The Role of Victimization in Shaping Households' Preparedness for Armed Conflicts in Israel.受害经历在塑造以色列家庭对武装冲突的准备方面所起的作用。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Feb;12(1):67-75. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.38. Epub 2017 Jul 27.