Department of Biochemistry of Nutrition, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine VIII, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2022 Dec 21;35(4):e0006222. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00062-22. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
Phage therapy has become a hot topic in medical research due to the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria strains. In the treatment of bacterial infections, bacteriophages have several advantages over antibiotics, including strain specificity, lack of serious side effects, and low development costs. However, scientists dismissed the clinical success of early clinical trials in the 1940s, slowing the adoption of this promising antibacterial application in Western countries. The current study used statistical methods commonly used in modern meta-analysis to reevaluate early 20th-century studies and compare them with clinical trials conducted in the last 20 years. Using a random effect model, the development of disease after treatment with or without phages was measured in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Based on the findings of 17 clinical trials conducted between 1921 and 1940, phage therapy was effective (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.44, value < 0.0001). The current study includes a topic review on modern clinical trials; four could be analyzed, indicating a noneffective therapy (OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.53 to 5.27, value = 0.0009). The results suggest phage therapy was surprisingly less effective than standard treatments in resolving bacterial infections. However, the results were affected by the small sample set size. This work also contextualizes the development of phage therapy in the early 20th century and highlights the expansion of phage applications in the last few years. In conclusion, the current review shows phage therapy is no longer an underestimated tool in the treatment of bacterial infections.
噬菌体疗法由于抗生素耐药菌株的日益流行,已成为医学研究的热门话题。在治疗细菌感染方面,噬菌体相对于抗生素具有几个优势,包括菌株特异性、缺乏严重的副作用和较低的开发成本。然而,科学家们在 20 世纪 40 年代否定了早期临床试验的临床成功,减缓了这种有前途的抗菌应用在西方国家的采用。本研究使用现代荟萃分析中常用的统计方法,重新评估了 20 世纪早期的研究,并将其与过去 20 年进行的临床试验进行了比较。使用随机效应模型,用比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)测量治疗前后疾病的发展。基于 1921 年至 1940 年期间进行的 17 项临床试验的结果,噬菌体疗法是有效的(OR=0.21,95%CI=0.10 至 0.44, 值<0.0001)。本研究包括对现代临床试验的主题回顾;其中四项可以进行分析,表明治疗无效(OR=2.84,95%CI=1.53 至 5.27, 值=0.0009)。结果表明,噬菌体疗法在解决细菌感染方面的效果明显低于标准治疗。然而,结果受到样本量小的影响。这项工作还将噬菌体疗法在 20 世纪早期的发展置于背景之下,并强调了近年来噬菌体应用的扩展。总之,目前的综述表明,噬菌体疗法不再是治疗细菌感染的低估工具。