Suppr超能文献

历史临床研究的再评估支持噬菌体疗法的有效性。

Reassessment of Historical Clinical Trials Supports the Effectiveness of Phage Therapy.

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry of Nutrition, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine VIII, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Rev. 2022 Dec 21;35(4):e0006222. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00062-22. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

Abstract

Phage therapy has become a hot topic in medical research due to the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria strains. In the treatment of bacterial infections, bacteriophages have several advantages over antibiotics, including strain specificity, lack of serious side effects, and low development costs. However, scientists dismissed the clinical success of early clinical trials in the 1940s, slowing the adoption of this promising antibacterial application in Western countries. The current study used statistical methods commonly used in modern meta-analysis to reevaluate early 20th-century studies and compare them with clinical trials conducted in the last 20 years. Using a random effect model, the development of disease after treatment with or without phages was measured in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Based on the findings of 17 clinical trials conducted between 1921 and 1940, phage therapy was effective (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.44, value < 0.0001). The current study includes a topic review on modern clinical trials; four could be analyzed, indicating a noneffective therapy (OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.53 to 5.27, value = 0.0009). The results suggest phage therapy was surprisingly less effective than standard treatments in resolving bacterial infections. However, the results were affected by the small sample set size. This work also contextualizes the development of phage therapy in the early 20th century and highlights the expansion of phage applications in the last few years. In conclusion, the current review shows phage therapy is no longer an underestimated tool in the treatment of bacterial infections.

摘要

噬菌体疗法由于抗生素耐药菌株的日益流行,已成为医学研究的热门话题。在治疗细菌感染方面,噬菌体相对于抗生素具有几个优势,包括菌株特异性、缺乏严重的副作用和较低的开发成本。然而,科学家们在 20 世纪 40 年代否定了早期临床试验的临床成功,减缓了这种有前途的抗菌应用在西方国家的采用。本研究使用现代荟萃分析中常用的统计方法,重新评估了 20 世纪早期的研究,并将其与过去 20 年进行的临床试验进行了比较。使用随机效应模型,用比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)测量治疗前后疾病的发展。基于 1921 年至 1940 年期间进行的 17 项临床试验的结果,噬菌体疗法是有效的(OR=0.21,95%CI=0.10 至 0.44, 值<0.0001)。本研究包括对现代临床试验的主题回顾;其中四项可以进行分析,表明治疗无效(OR=2.84,95%CI=1.53 至 5.27, 值=0.0009)。结果表明,噬菌体疗法在解决细菌感染方面的效果明显低于标准治疗。然而,结果受到样本量小的影响。这项工作还将噬菌体疗法在 20 世纪早期的发展置于背景之下,并强调了近年来噬菌体应用的扩展。总之,目前的综述表明,噬菌体疗法不再是治疗细菌感染的低估工具。

相似文献

7
Bacteriophages and its applications: an overview.噬菌体及其应用:综述。
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2017 Jan;62(1):17-55. doi: 10.1007/s12223-016-0471-x. Epub 2016 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Phage Products for Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance.对抗抗菌药物耐药性的噬菌体产品
Microorganisms. 2022 Jun 30;10(7):1324. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071324.
2
Phage therapy in the Covid-19 era: Advantages over antibiotics.新冠疫情时代的噬菌体疗法:相较于抗生素的优势
Curr Res Microb Sci. 2022;3:100115. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2022.100115. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
5
Antibiotic Resistance: From Pig to Meat.抗生素耐药性:从猪到肉
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Oct 5;10(10):1209. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10101209.
6
Intestinal Bacteriophage Therapy: Looking for Optimal Efficacy.肠道噬菌体治疗:寻求最佳疗效。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021 Dec 15;34(4):e0013621. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00136-21. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验