Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Feb;33(2):1015-1021. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09121-7. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
To investigate temporal changes in clinical reasoning quality of physicians who requested abdominal CT scans at a tertiary care center during on-call hours within a 15-year period.
This retrospective study included 531 patients who underwent abdominal CT at a tertiary care center during on-call hours on 36 randomly sampled unique calendar days in each of the years between 2005 and 2019. Clinical reasoning quality was expressed as a percentage (0-100%), taking into account the degree by which the differential diagnoses on the CT request form matched the CT diagnosis. Temporal changes in the quality of clinical reasoning and number of CT scans were assessed using Mann-Kendall tests. Associations between the quality of clinical reasoning with patient age and gender, requesting department, and time of CT scanning were determined with linear regression analyses.
The median annual clinical reasoning score was 0.4% (interquartile range: 0.3 to 0.6%; range: 0.1 to 1.9%). The quality of clinical reasoning significantly decreased between 2005 and 2019 (Mann-Kendall Tau of -0.829, p < 0.001), while the number of abdominal CT scans significantly increased (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.790, p < 0.001). There was a significant association between the quality of clinical reasoning and patient age (β coefficient of 0.210, p = 0.002). The quality of clinical reasoning was not significantly associated with patient gender, requesting department, or time of CT scanning.
The clinical reasoning quality of physicians who request abdominal CT scans during on-call hours has deteriorated over time. Clinical reasoning appears to be worse in younger patients.
• In patients with suspected acute abdominal pathology who are scheduled to undergo CT scanning, referring physicians generally have difficulties in making an accurate pretest (differential) diagnosis. • Clinical reasoning quality of physicians who request acute abdominal CT scans has deteriorated over the years, while the number of CT scans has shown a significant increase. • Clinical reasoning quality appears to be worse in younger patients in this setting.
调查在 15 年内,一家三级保健中心在值班期间要求进行腹部 CT 扫描的医生的临床推理质量的时间变化。
本回顾性研究纳入了 531 名在 2005 年至 2019 年期间的 36 个随机抽样的独特日历日的值班期间在一家三级保健中心接受腹部 CT 的患者。临床推理质量用百分比(0-100%)表示,考虑到 CT 请求表上的鉴别诊断与 CT 诊断的吻合程度。使用曼肯德尔检验评估临床推理质量和 CT 扫描数量的时间变化。用线性回归分析确定临床推理质量与患者年龄和性别、申请科室以及 CT 扫描时间之间的关系。
每年的临床推理评分中位数为 0.4%(四分位距:0.3-0.6%;范围:0.1-1.9%)。2005 年至 2019 年期间,临床推理质量显著下降(曼肯德尔 tau 值为-0.829,p<0.001),而腹部 CT 扫描数量显著增加(曼肯德尔 tau 值为 0.790,p<0.001)。临床推理质量与患者年龄呈显著相关(β系数为 0.210,p=0.002)。临床推理质量与患者性别、申请科室或 CT 扫描时间无显著相关。
在值班期间要求进行腹部 CT 扫描的医生的临床推理质量随时间推移而恶化。在这种情况下,年轻患者的临床推理似乎更差。