Suppr超能文献

XELOX 方案(腹腔内紫杉醇+卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂)治疗胃癌合并腹膜转移的 II 期临床研究结果。

Outcomes of a Phase II Study of Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel plus Systemic Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (XELOX) for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8597-8605. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11998-z. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adding intraperitoneal paclitaxel (IP-PTX) to paclitaxel/5-fluoropyrimidine has shown promising results in patients with gastric cancer peritoneal metastases (GCPM) but has not been studied with standard-of-care platinum/fluoropyrimidine combinations. Our goal to was evaluate IP-PTX with capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX) in GCPM.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with GCPM received IP PTX (40 mg/m, Days 1, 8), oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m twice daily, Days 1-14) and intravenous oxaliplatin (100 mg/m, Day 1) in 21-day cycles. Patients with synchronous GCPM underwent conversion surgery if they had good response after chemotherapy, conversion to negative cytology, no extraperitoneal metastasis, and no peritoneal disease during surgery. The primary endpoint was overall survival and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and safety. Outcomes from the trial were compared against a matched cohort of 39 GCPM patients who received systemic chemotherapy (SC) comprising platinum/fluoropyrimidine.

RESULTS

The median OS for the IP and SC groups was 14.6 and 10.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.74; p = 0.002). The median PFS for the IP and SC group was 9.5 and 4.4 months respectively (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.66; p < 0.001). Patients in the SC group were younger (IP vs. SC, 61 vs. 56 years, p = 0.021) and had better performance status (ECOG 0, IP vs. SC, 47.7% vs. 76.9%, p = 0.007) compared with the IP cohort. In IP group, conversion surgery was performed in 36.1% (13/36) of patients, with a median OS of 24.2 (95% CI 13.1-35.3) months and 1-year OS of 84.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

IP PTX with XELOX is a promising treatment option for GCPM patients. In patients with good response, conversion surgery was feasible with favourable outcomes.

摘要

背景

在患有胃癌腹膜转移(GCPM)的患者中,腹腔内紫杉醇(IP-PTX)联合紫杉醇/5-氟嘧啶显示出良好的效果,但尚未与标准铂类/氟嘧啶联合方案进行研究。我们的目的是评估 GCPM 患者中 IP-PTX 联合卡培他滨/奥沙利铂(XELOX)的疗效。

方法

44 例 GCPM 患者接受 IP-PTX(40mg/m,第 1、8 天)、卡培他滨(1000mg/m,每日 2 次,第 1-14 天)和奥沙利铂(100mg/m,第 1 天)静脉滴注,每 21 天为一个周期。对于化疗后反应良好、细胞学检查转为阴性、无腹腔外转移、手术时无腹膜疾病的同步 GCPM 患者,可进行转化手术。主要终点为总生存期,次要终点为无进展生存期和安全性。试验结果与 39 例接受铂类/氟嘧啶系统化疗(SC)的 GCPM 患者的匹配队列进行比较。

结果

IP 组和 SC 组的中位 OS 分别为 14.6 个月和 10.6 个月(风险比 [HR]0.44;95%置信区间 [CI]0.26-0.74;p=0.002)。IP 组和 SC 组的中位 PFS 分别为 9.5 个月和 4.4 个月(HR0.39;95%CI0.25-0.66;p<0.001)。SC 组患者较年轻(IP 组 vs. SC 组,61 岁 vs. 56 岁,p=0.021),ECOG 表现状态更好(IP 组 vs. SC 组,0 分 47.7% vs. 76.9%,p=0.007)。在 IP 组中,36.1%(13/36)的患者接受了转化手术,中位 OS 为 24.2 个月(95%CI 13.1-35.3),1 年 OS 为 84.6%。

结论

IP-PTX 联合 XELOX 是治疗 GCPM 患者的一种很有前途的治疗选择。在反应良好的患者中,转化手术是可行的,且具有良好的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验