被告、否认及拖延之后的堕胎问题。
Abortion after Defendants, denials, and delays.
作者信息
Kimport Katrina
机构信息
ANSIRH (Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Email:
出版信息
Sci Adv. 2022 Sep 9;8(36):eade5327. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade5327. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision will lead to more criminalization of activities during pregnancy, more abortion denials, and more abortions after the first trimester.
摘要
美国最高法院的裁决将导致孕期活动被更多地定罪、更多堕胎申请被驳回，以及更多在孕早期之后进行的堕胎行为。
相似文献
1
Abortion after Defendants, denials, and delays.被告、否认及拖延之后的堕胎问题。
Sci Adv. 2022 Sep 9;8(36):eade5327. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade5327. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Florida Women's Medical Clinic v. Smith.佛罗里达妇女医疗诊所诉史密斯案
Fed Suppl. 1990 Aug 1;746:89-91.
3
Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again.1982年堕胎案：最高法院再次审理。
Conn Med. 1982 Nov;46(11):681.
4
[Abortion in the United States. Decisions of the Supreme Court].[美国的堕胎问题。最高法院的裁决]
Nouv Presse Med. 1973 Jul 28;2(29):1952-4.
5
Courts rejecting maternal health rational for hospitalization for all mid-trimester abortions.法院驳回了将孕中期堕胎住院的理由归结为孕产妇健康的观点。
Fam Plann Popul Rep. 1980 Dec;9(6):91-4.
6
Regulating abortions.规范堕胎行为。
N Engl J Med. 1973 May 10;288(19):1027-8. doi: 10.1056/nejm197305102881923.
7
Evaluating Intellectual Disability after the Redux.智力障碍评估：再探。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2019 Dec;47(4):486-492. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003884-19. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
8
Too young to kill? U.S. Supreme Court treads a dangerous path in Roper v. Simmons.年少不应受死刑惩罚？美国最高法院在“罗珀诉西蒙斯案”中走上了一条危险之路。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007;35(3):364-72.
9
Webster versus reproductive health services.韦伯斯特诉生殖健康服务公司案
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 1989 Nov-Dec;14(6):423.
10
Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.法院解除对执行密西西比州反堕胎法的禁令。
Sun. 1992 Aug 7:3A.
引用本文的文献
1
The Impact of the Decision on Access to Gender Diverse Care at a Midwest Academic Health Center.该决定对中西部学术医疗中心提供性别多元化护理服务的影响。
Kans J Med. 2025 Aug 15;18(4):70-74. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol18.23425. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
2
Blood Borders: State laws, vaccine misinformation, and the threat to the United States blood supply.《血液边界：州法律、疫苗错误信息以及对美国血液供应的威胁》
Transfusion. 2025 Aug;65(8):1534-1542. doi: 10.1111/trf.18312. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
3
Weight and Procedural Abortion Complications: A Systematic Review.体重与人工流产并发症：一项系统评价
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Mar 1;145(3):307-315. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005821. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
4
Evaluating participant engagement in a preconception cohort study in relation to the Dobbs decision.评估与多布斯裁决相关的孕前队列研究中参与者的参与度。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2024 Sep;38(7):627-634. doi: 10.1111/ppe.13080. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
5
Organizing Primary Care Clinicians to Expand Reproductive Health Access: A Qualitative Program Evaluation.组织初级保健临床医生扩大生殖健康服务：定性方案评估。
Fam Med. 2024 Apr;56(4):250-258. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.589091. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
6
U.S. college students' perspectives on contraception and abortion post-: the influence of socioeconomic privilege and gender inequity.美国大学生对避孕和堕胎的看法后:社会经济特权和性别不平等的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 10;11:1274154. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1274154. eCollection 2023.
7
The Zika virus: an opportunity to revisit reproductive health needs and disparities.寨卡病毒：重新审视生殖健康需求与差距的契机。
Germs. 2022 Dec 31;12(4):519-537. doi: 10.18683/germs.2022.1357. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Impact of Geography and Rurality on Preconception Health Status in the United States.地理和农村因素对美国孕前健康状况的影响。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Nov 9;20:E101. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230104.
9
Abortion Restrictions Threaten All Reproductive Health Care Clinicians.堕胎限制威胁到所有生殖健康护理临床医生。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Apr;113(4):384-385. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307239.
10
Abortion terminology preferences: a cross-sectional survey of people accessing abortion care.堕胎术语偏好：一项对接受堕胎护理的人的横断面调查。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Jan 19;23(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02152-8.
本文引用的文献
1
Predicted changes in abortion access and incidence in a post-Roe world.罗诉韦德案被推翻后堕胎可及性和发生率的预测变化。
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.139. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
2
Metrics of Survival: Post-Abortion Care and Reproductive Rights in Senegal.生存指标：塞内加尔的流产后护理和生殖权利。
Med Anthropol. 2019 Feb-Mar;38(2):152-166. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2018.1496333. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
3
4
The Stratified Legitimacy of Abortions.堕胎的分层合法性。
J Health Soc Behav. 2016 Dec;57(4):503-516. doi: 10.1177/0022146516669970. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
5
Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States.美国因提供者的妊娠年龄限制而拒绝堕胎。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104(9):1687-94. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301378. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
6
Arrests of and forced interventions on pregnant women in the United States, 1973-2005: implications for women's legal status and public health.美国 1973-2005 年对孕妇的逮捕和强制干预：对妇女法律地位和公共卫生的影响。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013 Apr;38(2):299-343. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1966324. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
Zotero 插件