Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control, MOE; Key Laboratory of Meat Processing, MARA; Jiangsu Innovative Center of Meat Production, Processing and Quality Control; College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
J Agric Food Chem. 2022 Oct 5;70(39):12442-12455. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c04246. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
Real meat and plant-based meat analogues have different in vitro protein digestibility properties. This study aims to further explore their in vivo digestion and absorption and their effects on the gastrointestinal digestive function of mice. Compared with the real pork and beef, plant-based meat analogues significantly reduced the number of gastric parietal cells, the levels of gastrin/CCKBR, acetylcholine/AchR, Ca, CAMK II, PKC, and PKA, the activity of H, K-ATPase, and pepsin, the duodenal villus height, and the ratio of villus height to crypt depth and downregulated the expression of most nitrogen nutrient sensors. Peptidomics revealed that plant-based meat analogues released fewer peptides during in vivo digestion and increased the host- and microbial-derived peptides. Moreover, the real beef showed better absorption properties. These results suggested that plant-based meat analogues weaken gastrointestinal digestive function of mice, and their digestion and absorption performance in vivo is not as good as the real meat.
真正的肉类和植物性肉类模拟物具有不同的体外蛋白质消化特性。本研究旨在进一步探讨它们在体内的消化和吸收及其对小鼠胃肠道消化功能的影响。与真正的猪肉和牛肉相比,植物性肉类模拟物显著减少了胃壁细胞的数量、胃泌素/CCKBR、乙酰胆碱/AchR、Ca、CAMK II、PKC 和 PKA 的水平、胃酸/钾-ATP 酶的活性和胃蛋白酶的活性、十二指肠绒毛高度以及绒毛高度与隐窝深度的比值,并下调了大多数氮营养传感器的表达。肽组学揭示,植物性肉类模拟物在体内消化过程中释放的肽较少,同时增加了宿主和微生物来源的肽。此外,真正的牛肉表现出更好的吸收特性。这些结果表明,植物性肉类模拟物削弱了小鼠的胃肠道消化功能,其在体内的消化和吸收性能不如真正的肉类。