• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现代导管室的辐射减少:单中心经验。

Radiation reduction in a modern catheterization laboratory: A single-center experience.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Department of Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct;100(4):575-584. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30396. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.30396
PMID:36073017
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Measures were undertaken at the Cleveland Clinic to reduce radiation exposure to patients and personnel working in the catheterization laboratories. We report our experience with these improved systems over a 7-year period in patients undergoing diagnostic catheterization (DC) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs).

METHODS

Patients were categorized into preinitiative (2009-2012) and postinitiative (2013-2019) groups in the DC and PCI cohorts. Propensity score matching was done between the pre- and postinitiative groups for both cohorts based on age, sex, body surface area, total fluoroscopy time, and total acquisition time. The effectiveness of radiation reduction measures was assessed by comparing the total air kerma (K ), and fluoroscopy- and acquisition-mode air kerma in patients in the two groups.

RESULTS

In the DC cohort, there was a significant reduction in K in the postinitiative group in comparison to the preinitiative group (median, 396 vs. 857 mGy; p < 0.001). In the PCI cohort, K in the postinitiative group was 1265 mGy, which was significantly lower than the corresponding values in the preinitiative group (1994 mGy; p < 0.001). We also observed a significant reduction in fluoroscopy- and acquisition-based air kerma rates, and air kerma area product in the postinitiative group in comparison to the preinitiative group in both matched and unmatched DC and PCI cohorts after the institution of radiation reduction measures.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant and sustained reduction in radiation exposure to patients in the catheterization laboratory with the implementation of advanced protocols. Similar algorithms can be applied in other laboratories to achieve a similar reduction in radiation exposure.

摘要

背景

克利夫兰诊所采取了措施,以降低导管室患者和工作人员的辐射暴露。我们报告了在接受诊断性导管检查(DC)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中,使用这些改进系统 7 年的经验。

方法

在 DC 和 PCI 队列中,患者被分为干预前(2009-2012 年)和干预后(2013-2019 年)组。基于年龄、性别、体表面积、总透视时间和总采集时间,对两个队列的预干预组和后干预组进行倾向评分匹配。通过比较两组患者的总空气比释动能(K)以及透视和采集模式下的空气比释动能,评估辐射减少措施的有效性。

结果

在 DC 队列中,与干预前组相比,干预后组的 K 值显著降低(中位数,396 与 857 mGy;p<0.001)。在 PCI 队列中,干预后组的 K 值为 1265 mGy,明显低于干预前组(1994 mGy;p<0.001)。在介入辐射减少措施实施后,无论是在匹配组还是非匹配组,DC 和 PCI 队列中,干预后组的透视和采集模式下的空气比释动能率以及空气比释动能面积乘积也显著降低。

结论

通过实施先进的方案,导管室患者的辐射暴露显著且持续降低。类似的算法可以应用于其他实验室,以实现类似的辐射暴露降低。

相似文献

1
Radiation reduction in a modern catheterization laboratory: A single-center experience.现代导管室的辐射减少:单中心经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct;100(4):575-584. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30396. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Measures to reduce radiation in a modern cardiac catheterization laboratory.现代心脏导管实验室中减少辐射的措施。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(4):447-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001499. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
3
Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.心导管实验室中射束角度与辐射暴露的关系。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May;7(5):558-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.12.203. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
4
Fluoroscopy pulse rate reduction during diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: An evaluation of radiation dose, procedure complications and outcomes.心导管实验室诊断和治疗成像期间透视脉冲率降低:辐射剂量、手术并发症及结果评估
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 1;89(4):665-670. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26555. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
5
Radiation Reduction in the Pediatric Catheterization Laboratory Using a Novel Imaging System.使用新型成像系统减少儿科心导管实验室的辐射
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Jan;30(1):28-33. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
6
Retrospective study of patients radiation dose during cardiac catheterization procedures.心脏导管插入术期间患者辐射剂量的回顾性研究。
Br J Radiol. 2019 Jul;92(1099):20181021. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20181021. Epub 2019 May 14.
7
Ionizing radiation exposure in complex percutaneous coronary intervention: Defining local diagnostic reference levels in the catheterization laboratory.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的电离辐射暴露:在导管室中定义局部诊断参考水平。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2024 Jul;43(7):367-374. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2023.10.010. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
8
Is it possible to reduce radiation exposure during transcatheter atrial septal defect closure in children?儿童经导管房间隔缺损封堵术时能否降低辐射暴露?
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2020 Nov;48(8):760-765. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2020.45383.
9
Reducing Radiation Exposure in Cardiac Catheterizations for Congenital Heart Disease.减少先天性心脏病心脏导管插入术中的辐射暴露
Pediatr Cardiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):638-649. doi: 10.1007/s00246-018-2039-9. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
10
Comparison of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Traditional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort.机器人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与传统经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:一项大型队列的倾向评分匹配分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May;13(5):e008888. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008888. Epub 2020 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of a Comprehensive ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Protocol With Key Process Metrics Among Patients Transferred for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.综合ST段抬高型心肌梗死方案与转至行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者关键流程指标的关联
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e034054. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034054. Epub 2025 May 2.
2
Assessing and improving radiation safety in cardiac catheterization: a study from Cairo University Hospital.评估与改善心脏导管插入术中的辐射安全:开罗大学医院的一项研究
Egypt Heart J. 2024 Feb 9;76(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s43044-024-00449-7.