University of Surrey, Centre for Environment and Sustainability, Stag Hill, GuildfordGU2 7XH, UK.
WWF, Living Planet Centre, Woking, UK.
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Nov;25(11):3204-3214. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022001914. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
To explore changes in plant-based and meat product sales during and after implementation of a multi-component in-store intervention implemented by a major UK food retailer. Secondary objectives included exploring differences by store format and area affluence.
The intervention increased the visibility, accessibility, affordability and availability of a selection of plant-based products. Unit sales of plant-based and meat products during the intervention (January 2021) were compared with pre- (November 2020) and post-intervention (February and March 2021). Non-meat product sales were assessed as a control. Negative binomial mixed models were used to explore sales changes and differences by store format or affluence.
The intervention was applied in a real-world supermarket setting during Veganuary.
Stores that applied the full intervention ( 154) were included for analysis. Weekly sales data for each store were obtained from the retailer.
Average weekly unit sales of plant-based products increased significantly (57 %) during the intervention period (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1·52 (95 % CI1·51, 1·55)). Plant-based product sales decreased post-intervention but remained 15 % higher than pre-intervention (IRR 1·13 (95 % CI 1·12, 1·14)). There was no significant change in meat sales according to time period. The increase in plant-based product sales was greatest at superstores (58 %), especially those located in below average affluence areas (64 %).
Results suggest that increasing visibility, accessibility, affordability and availability of plant-based products led to increased sales, with evidence of lasting effects. No significant changes in meat sales were observed. Variation according to store format and area affluence indicates targeted intervention approaches are needed.
探索在英国主要食品零售商实施多方面店内干预措施期间和之后,植物性食品和肉类产品销售的变化。次要目标包括按商店类型和地区富裕程度探索差异。
干预措施提高了植物性产品的可见性、可及性、可负担性和可得性。在干预期间(2021 年 1 月)的植物性和肉类产品的单位销售额与干预前(2020 年 11 月)和干预后(2021 年 2 月和 3 月)进行了比较。非肉类产品销售被作为对照进行评估。使用负二项式混合模型来探索销售变化和按商店类型或富裕程度的差异。
在 Veganuary 期间,在现实世界的超市环境中应用了干预措施。
应用完整干预措施的商店(154 个)被纳入分析。从零售商处获得每个商店的每周销售数据。
干预期间植物性产品的每周平均单位销售额显著增加(57%)(发病率比(IRR)1.52(95%CI1.51,1.55))。干预后植物性产品销售下降,但仍比干预前高 15%(IRR 1.13(95%CI1.12,1.14))。根据时间段,肉类销售没有明显变化。超级市场的植物性产品销售增长最大(58%),尤其是位于平均富裕程度以下地区的超级市场(64%)。
结果表明,提高植物性产品的可见性、可及性、可负担性和可得性导致销售额增加,并显示出持久的效果。肉类销售没有明显变化。按商店类型和地区富裕程度的变化表明需要采取有针对性的干预措施。