• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用自注意力网络和多层分类模型评估来自 Twitter 交流的城市空气质量。

Assessment of urban air quality from Twitter communication using self-attention network and a multilayer classification model.

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, SCMS School of Engineering & Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India.

Department of Computer Science & Engineering, SCMS School of Engineering & Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):10414-10425. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22836-w. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-22836-w
PMID:36074292
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9453714/
Abstract

Social media platforms are one of the prominent new-age methods used by public for spreading awareness or drawing attention on an issue or concern. This study demonstrates how the twitter responses of public can be used for qualitative monitoring of air pollution in an urban area. Tweets discussing about air quality in Delhi, India, were extracted during 2019-2020 using a machine learning technique based on self-attention network. These tweets were cleaned, sorted, and classified into 3-class quality viz. poor air quality, good air quality, and noise or neutral tweets. The present study used a multilayer classification model with first layer as an embedding layer and second layer as bi-directional long-short term memory (BiLSTM) layer. A method was then devised for estimating PM concentration from the tweets using 'spaCy' similarity analysis of classified tweets and data extracted from Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations (CAAQMS) in Delhi for the study period. The accuracy of this estimation was found to be high (80-99%) for extreme air quality conditions (extremely good or severe) and lower during moderate variations in air quality. Application of this methodology depended on perceivable changes in air quality, twitter engagement, and environmental consciousness among public.

摘要

社交媒体平台是公众用来传播意识或引起对某个问题或关注点关注的新兴方法之一。本研究展示了如何使用公众在推特上的回复来对城市地区的空气污染进行定性监测。使用基于自注意力网络的机器学习技术,在 2019-2020 年期间提取了印度德里有关空气质量的推文。对这些推文进行了清理、分类,并分为 3 类质量,即空气质量差、空气质量好和噪声或中性推文。本研究使用了一个多层分类模型,第一层是嵌入层,第二层是双向长短时记忆(BiLSTM)层。然后,使用“spaCy”对分类推文和德里在研究期间的连续环境空气质量监测站(CAAQMS)中提取的数据进行相似性分析,设计了一种从推文中估计 PM 浓度的方法。这种估计的准确性在极端空气质量条件(极好或严重)下很高(80-99%),而在空气质量适度变化时较低。该方法的应用取决于空气质量的可感知变化、推特参与度和公众的环境意识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/5cc2a1f586ec/11356_2022_22836_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/0b81d7ea44c2/11356_2022_22836_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/f4450d07428f/11356_2022_22836_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/bafd3488e6d7/11356_2022_22836_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/097d6d3f06b5/11356_2022_22836_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/92884f522a9a/11356_2022_22836_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/5cc2a1f586ec/11356_2022_22836_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/0b81d7ea44c2/11356_2022_22836_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/f4450d07428f/11356_2022_22836_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/bafd3488e6d7/11356_2022_22836_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/097d6d3f06b5/11356_2022_22836_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/92884f522a9a/11356_2022_22836_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7674/9453714/5cc2a1f586ec/11356_2022_22836_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of urban air quality from Twitter communication using self-attention network and a multilayer classification model.利用自注意力网络和多层分类模型评估来自 Twitter 交流的城市空气质量。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):10414-10425. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22836-w. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
Feasibility of using social media to monitor outdoor air pollution in London, England.利用社交媒体监测英国伦敦室外空气污染的可行性。
Prev Med. 2019 Apr;121:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
3
Applying Multiple Data Collection Tools to Quantify Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Communication on Twitter.应用多种数据收集工具量化推特上的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗传播情况
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 5;18(12):e318. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6670.
4
Utilizing Twitter data for analysis of chemotherapy.利用 Twitter 数据进行化疗分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Dec;120:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
5
The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.拥堵收费计划对伦敦空气质量的影响。第1部分。排放建模与空气污染测量分析。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Apr(155):5-71.
6
Unprecedented reduction in air pollution and corresponding short-term premature mortality associated with COVID-19 lockdown in Delhi, India.印度德里 COVID-19 封锁期间,空气污染前所未有减少,与之相关的短期过早死亡率也降低。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2021 Sep;71(9):1085-1101. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2021.1905104. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
Using Social Media Data to Understand the Impact of Promotional Information on Laypeople's Discussions: A Case Study of Lynch Syndrome.利用社交媒体数据了解宣传信息对普通民众讨论的影响:以林奇综合征为例
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 13;19(12):e414. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9266.
8
The Saudi Ministry of Health's Twitter Communication Strategies and Public Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis Study.沙特卫生部在 COVID-19 大流行期间的 Twitter 传播策略和公众参与:内容分析研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jul 12;7(7):e27942. doi: 10.2196/27942.
9
Characterizing the Discussion of Antibiotics in the Twittersphere: What is the Bigger Picture?剖析推特上关于抗生素的讨论:整体情况如何?
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 19;17(6):e154. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4220.
10
Prediction and assessment of the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on air quality over Kolkata: a deep transfer learning approach.预测和评估 COVID-19 封锁对加尔各答空气质量的影响:一种深度迁移学习方法。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Dec 22;195(1):223. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10761-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Breathing together: A global hashtag analysis of #LungHealth on platform X (formerly Twitter).共同呼吸:对平台X(原推特)上#肺部健康#话题的全球标签分析。
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 16;11:20552076251335717. doi: 10.1177/20552076251335717. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
A GIS-based approach to determining optimal location for decentralized inner city smart filters: Toward net zero cities.一种基于地理信息系统的方法来确定市中心分散式智能过滤器的最佳位置:迈向净零城市。
Heliyon. 2024 May 21;10(11):e31645. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31645. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Spatial modelling of soil salinity: deep or shallow learning models?土壤盐度的空间建模:深度学习模型还是浅层学习模型?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(29):39432-39450. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13503-7. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
Evaluation of machine learning techniques with multiple remote sensing datasets in estimating monthly concentrations of ground-level PM.利用多种遥感数据集评估机器学习技术估算地面 PM 月浓度
Environ Pollut. 2018 Nov;242(Pt B):1417-1426. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.029. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
3
Using Social Media to Detect Outdoor Air Pollution and Monitor Air Quality Index (AQI): A Geo-Targeted Spatiotemporal Analysis Framework with Sina Weibo (Chinese Twitter).
利用社交媒体检测室外空气污染并监测空气质量指数(AQI):基于新浪微博(中国版推特)的地理定位时空分析框架
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 27;10(10):e0141185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141185. eCollection 2015.