Goodhew Stephanie C, Edwards Mark
Research School of Psychology, Australian National University.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Mar;152(3):749-762. doi: 10.1037/xge0001294. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
The detection of particular targets is critical in applied contexts, such as identifying cancers in diagnostic medical imaging and finding weapons in airport baggage security screening. Missed targets can have dire consequences in such contexts. These contexts are also typically characterized by low prevalence or rare targets such that most searched-through images do not contain targets. A substantive body of evidence demonstrates that humans are much more likely to miss targets when they are rare. Therefore, it is critical to understand the factors that may mitigate or exacerbate this general tendency to miss rare targets. The present study considered the relative role of individual differences in cognitive failures, cognitive empathy, and negative affect (i.e., depression, anxiety, and stress) in predicting the detection of rare targets. Across two experiments, there was evidence that individuals experiencing elevated cognitive failures were more likely to miss the rare targets. In Experiment 1, negative affect was also related to performance, but it was only cognitive failures that made a unique contribution to explaining target-present accuracy when they were pitted against one another. There was no evidence that cognitive empathy was linked to performance. These findings have important theoretical implications and also highlight potential avenues for intervention to improve the detection of rare targets. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
在应用场景中,检测特定目标至关重要,比如在诊断医学成像中识别癌症以及在机场行李安检中查找武器。在这类场景中,漏检目标可能会带来严重后果。这些场景的典型特征还包括低患病率或罕见目标,以至于大多数被检查的图像都不包含目标。大量证据表明,当目标罕见时,人类更有可能漏检。因此,了解可能减轻或加剧这种漏检罕见目标的普遍倾向的因素至关重要。本研究考虑了认知失误、认知共情和消极情绪(即抑郁、焦虑和压力)方面的个体差异在预测罕见目标检测中的相对作用。在两个实验中,有证据表明认知失误增加的个体更有可能漏检罕见目标。在实验1中,消极情绪也与表现有关,但当将认知失误与消极情绪相互比较时,只有认知失误对解释存在目标时的准确率有独特贡献。没有证据表明认知共情与表现有关。这些发现具有重要的理论意义,也凸显了改善罕见目标检测的潜在干预途径。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)