• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠外科的基准:多国研究定义高低位前切除术的质量阈值。

Benchmarks in colorectal surgery: multinational study to define quality thresholds in high and low anterior resection.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2022 Nov 22;109(12):1274-1281. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac300.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znac300
PMID:36074702
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Benchmark comparisons in surgery allow identification of gaps in the quality of care provided. The aim of this study was to determine quality thresholds for high (HAR) and low (LAR) anterior resections in colorectal cancer surgery by applying the concept of benchmarking.

METHODS

This 5-year multinational retrospective study included patients who underwent anterior resection for cancer in 19 high-volume centres on five continents. Benchmarks were defined for 11 relevant postoperative variables at discharge, 3 months, and 6 months (for LAR). Benchmarks were calculated for two separate cohorts: patients without (ideal) and those with (non-ideal) outcome-relevant co-morbidities. Benchmark cut-offs were defined as the 75th percentile of each centre's median value.

RESULTS

A total of 3903 patients who underwent HAR and 3726 who had LAR for cancer were analysed. After 3 months' follow-up, the mortality benchmark in HAR for ideal and non-ideal patients was 0.0 versus 3.0 per cent, and in LAR it was 0.0 versus 2.2 per cent. Benchmark results for anastomotic leakage were 5.0 versus 6.9 per cent for HAR, and 13.6 versus 11.8 per cent for LAR. The overall morbidity benchmark in HAR was a Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) score of 8.6 versus 14.7, and that for LAR was CCI® score 11.9 versus 18.3.

CONCLUSION

Regular comparison of individual-surgeon or -unit outcome data against benchmark thresholds may identify gaps in care quality that can improve patient outcome.

摘要

背景

手术中的基准比较可以确定提供的护理质量差距。本研究旨在通过应用基准化的概念确定结直肠癌手术中高(HAR)和低(LAR)前切除术的质量阈值。

方法

这是一项为期 5 年的多国回顾性研究,纳入了来自五个大陆 19 个高容量中心接受前切除术治疗癌症的患者。在出院时、3 个月和 6 个月(对于 LAR),为 11 个相关术后变量定义了基准。为两个独立队列计算了基准:无(理想)和有(非理想)与结果相关的合并症的患者。基准截止值定义为每个中心中位数的第 75 个百分位数。

结果

分析了 3903 例接受 HAR 和 3726 例接受 LAR 治疗癌症的患者。在 3 个月的随访后,HAR 中理想和非理想患者的死亡率基准为 0.0 与 3.0%,而 LAR 中为 0.0 与 2.2%。HAR 吻合口漏的基准结果为 5.0 与 6.9%,而 LAR 为 13.6 与 11.8%。HAR 的总体发病率基准为综合并发症指数(CCI®)评分为 8.6 与 14.7,而 LAR 为 CCI®评分为 11.9 与 18.3。

结论

定期将个别外科医生或单位的结果数据与基准阈值进行比较,可能会发现护理质量差距,从而改善患者的结果。

相似文献

1
Benchmarks in colorectal surgery: multinational study to define quality thresholds in high and low anterior resection.结直肠外科的基准:多国研究定义高低位前切除术的质量阈值。
Br J Surg. 2022 Nov 22;109(12):1274-1281. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac300.
2
Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis.定义低风险患者机器人辅助低位前直肠切除术的基准:一项多中心分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Sep;36(9):1945-1953. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03988-6. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
A multicentre outcome analysis to define global benchmarks for donation after circulatory death liver transplantation.多中心结局分析,定义循环死亡器官捐献肝移植的全球基准。
J Hepatol. 2022 Feb;76(2):371-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
4
Redo coloanal anastomosis for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: an analysis of 59 cases.直肠癌前切除术后吻合口漏行再次经肛结肠吻合术:59 例分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jan;20(1):35-43. doi: 10.1111/codi.13844.
5
Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Outcomes and Morbidity.直肠癌的微创直肠切除术:全国范围内对短期结果和发病率的观察。
World J Surg. 2020 Sep;44(9):3130-3140. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05560-9.
6
Defining Benchmarks in Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter Outcome Analysis Determining Best Achievable Results.定义肝移植的基准:一项多中心结局分析确定最佳可实现结果。
Ann Surg. 2018 Mar;267(3):419-425. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002477.
7
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Low Anterior Resection.低位前切除术后吻合口漏的危险因素
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2020 Jun 30;62(2):290-294. doi: 10.3897/folmed.62.e47727.
8
Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: a call for benchmarking.直肠癌低位前切除术中去功能化造口的成本效益:呼吁建立基准。
Arch Surg. 2003 Dec;138(12):1334-8; discussion 1339. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1334.
9
Ultralow Anterior Resection and Coloanal Anastomosis for Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: An Appraisal Based on Bowel Function.超低位直肠前切除术和结肠肛管吻合术治疗低位直肠肿瘤:基于肠功能的评估。
Dig Surg. 2019;36(5):409-417. doi: 10.1159/000490899. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
10
Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma - Novel Benchmark Values for Surgical and Oncological Outcomes From 24 Expert Centers.肝门部胆管癌 - 24 家专家中心提供的手术和肿瘤学结果的新基准值。
Ann Surg. 2021 Nov 1;274(5):780-788. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005103.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining benchmark values for outcomes of comprehensive resection of primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a retrospective multicenter study.确定原发性腹膜后脂肪肉瘤根治性切除术后结局的基准值:一项回顾性多中心研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jun 3;84:103280. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103280. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Contact radiotherapy for rectal cancer (CORRECT): study protocol for a multicentre randomised phase II trial.直肠癌近距离放射治疗(CORRECT):一项多中心随机II期试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 9;15(4):e100356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100356.
3
A comprehensive evaluation of 80 consecutive robotic low anterior resections: impact of not mobilizing the splenic flexure alongside low-tie vascular ligation as a standardized technique.
80 例连续机器人低位前切除术的综合评估:不伴低位结扎血管同时游离脾曲作为标准化技术的影响。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 2;18(1):156. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01917-7.
4
Defining benchmarks for total and distal gastrectomy: global multicentre analysis.全胃切除术和远端胃切除术的基准定义:全球多中心分析
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 31;111(2). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad379.
5
Global benchmarks in primary robotic bariatric surgery redefine quality standards for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.全球机器人减重手术基准重新定义了 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术的质量标准。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad374.
6
Benchmarking: a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons in surgery.基准测试:一种用于手术结果比较的新型衡量工具。
Int J Surg. 2023 Mar 1;109(3):419-428. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000212.