From the Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (MR, RT, YV); Department of Physiology, Nutrition and Biomechanics, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (GIH), Stockholm, Sweden (YV); Institute of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa (WD); IOC Research Center, Stellenbosch, South Africa (WD); Centre for Sport and Exercise Science and Medicine (SESAME), University of Brighton, Eastbourne, United Kingdom (NW); and Rehabilitation Medicine Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (KF).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Aug 1;102(8):746-753. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002095. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Data from the Paralympic Games indicate a fluctuating injury incidence in the Paralympic sport goalball, but the mechanisms behind have not been explored. The aims of this study are to (1) quantitatively analyze goalball injuries reported in the London 2012 and Rio 2016 Paralympic Games, (2) qualitatively explain the differences between both games, and (3) qualitatively assess general injury mechanisms and prevention opportunities of injuries in Goalball.
This is a mixed-method study. Injury incidence rates were analyzed from data collected during the 2012 and 2016 Paralympic Games. Then, semistructured interviews of games participants qualitatively explored injury mechanisms and prevention opportunities.
A reduction of injuries occurred from 2012 (incidence rate, 19.5; 95% confidence interval, 12.5-26.5) to 2016 (incidence rate: 5.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-9.5). In both games, acute traumatic injuries were most common. Female athletes reported higher rate of injuries compared with males ( P = 0.05). Qualitative data revealed that causes of injuries were collisions, overuse, and poor physical conditioning. The differences between the two games were explained by equipment, environment, and preparations.
The result from this study indicates that injuries in goalball are multifactorial. Ultimately, the mixed-method data from this study can help the sports context develop prevention measures.
残奥会数据表明,残奥会运动项目——盲人门球的受伤发生率波动不定,但背后的机制尚未得到探索。本研究旨在:(1)定量分析伦敦 2012 年和里约 2016 年残奥会报告的盲人门球损伤;(2)定性解释两届比赛之间的差异;(3)定性评估盲人门球中一般损伤机制和预防损伤的机会。
这是一项混合方法研究。对 2012 年和 2016 年残奥会期间收集的数据进行了损伤发生率分析。然后,对比赛参与者进行半结构化访谈,从定性角度探讨了损伤机制和预防机会。
与 2012 年(发生率,19.5;95%置信区间,12.5-26.5)相比,2016 年的损伤发生率有所降低(发生率:5.6;95%置信区间,1.7-9.5)。在两届比赛中,急性创伤性损伤最为常见。与男性运动员相比,女性运动员报告的损伤发生率更高(P=0.05)。定性数据显示,损伤的原因是碰撞、过度使用和身体状况不佳。两届比赛之间的差异可归因于设备、环境和准备情况。
本研究结果表明,盲人门球损伤是多因素的。最终,这项研究的混合方法数据可以帮助体育界制定预防措施。