Suppr超能文献

不同犬种之间的疼痛敏感性存在差异,但并非兽医们所认为的那样。

Pain sensitivity differs between dog breeds but not in the way veterinarians believe.

作者信息

Caddiell Rachel M P, Cunningham Rachael M, White Philip A, Lascelles B Duncan X, Gruen Margaret E

机构信息

Comparative Behavioral Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Translational Research in Pain, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 26;4:1165340. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1165340. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Veterinarians hold distinct breed-specific pain sensitivity beliefs that differ from the general public but are highly consistent with one another. This is remarkable as there is no current scientific evidence for biological differences in pain sensitivity across dog breeds. Therefore, the present study evaluated whether pain sensitivity thresholds differ across a set of dog breeds and, if so, whether veterinarians' pain sensitivity ratings explain these differences or whether these ratings are attributed to behavioral characteristics.

METHODS

Pain sensitivity thresholds [using quantitative sensory testing (QST) methods] and canine behaviors (using owner questionnaires and emotional reactivity tests) were prospectively measured across selected dog breeds. Adult, healthy dogs from 10 dog breeds/breed types were recruited, representing breeds subjectively rated by veterinarians as high (chihuahua, German shepherd, Maltese, Siberian husky), average (border collie, Boston terrier, Jack Russell terrier), or low (golden retriever, pitbull, Labrador retriever) pain sensitivity. A final sample of 149 dogs was included in statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Veterinarians' pain sensitivity ratings provided a minimal explanation for pain sensitivity thresholds measured using QST in dogs; however, dog breeds did differ in their pain sensitivity thresholds across the QST methods evaluated. Breed differences were observed for some aspects of emotional reactivity tests; however, these behavioral differences did not explain the differences in pain sensitivity thresholds found. Veterinarians' pain sensitivity ratings were positively associated with dog approach scores for the disgruntled stranger test suggesting that the way dogs greet strangers may be a factor influencing veterinarians' ratings of pain sensitivity across dog breeds.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Overall, these findings highlight a need to investigate biological mechanisms that may explain breed differences in pain sensitivity because this may inform pain management recommendations. Further, future research should focus on when and how these breed-specific pain sensitivity beliefs developed in veterinarians, as veterinarians' beliefs could impact the recognition and treatment of pain for canine patients.

摘要

背景

兽医持有与公众不同的、特定品种的疼痛敏感性观念,且彼此高度一致。这很值得注意,因为目前尚无科学证据表明不同犬种在疼痛敏感性上存在生物学差异。因此,本研究评估了一组犬种的疼痛敏感性阈值是否存在差异,如果存在差异,兽医的疼痛敏感性评级能否解释这些差异,或者这些评级是否归因于行为特征。

方法

前瞻性地测量了选定犬种的疼痛敏感性阈值[采用定量感觉测试(QST)方法]和犬类行为(采用主人问卷和情绪反应测试)。招募了来自10个犬种/品种类型的成年健康犬,这些品种被兽医主观评定为疼痛敏感性高(吉娃娃、德国牧羊犬、马尔济斯犬、西伯利亚哈士奇)、中等(边境牧羊犬、波士顿梗、杰克罗素梗)或低(金毛寻回犬、斗牛犬、拉布拉多寻回犬)。最终样本包括149只犬,纳入统计分析。

结果

兽医的疼痛敏感性评级对用QST测量的犬类疼痛敏感性阈值解释甚少;然而,在所评估的QST方法中,不同犬种的疼痛敏感性阈值确实存在差异。在情绪反应测试的某些方面观察到了品种差异;然而,这些行为差异并不能解释所发现的疼痛敏感性阈值差异。兽医的疼痛敏感性评级与犬在不满测试心怀不满陌生人测试中的接近得分呈正相关,这表明犬类迎接陌生人的方式可能是影响兽医对不同犬种疼痛敏感性评级的一个因素。

结论及临床意义

总体而言,这些发现凸显了有必要研究可能解释疼痛敏感性品种差异的生物学机制,因为这可能为疼痛管理建议提供依据。此外,未来的研究应关注兽医中这些特定品种疼痛敏感性观念是何时以及如何形成的,因为兽医的观念可能会影响犬类患者疼痛的识别和治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ca3/10332458/556e78abf3dc/fpain-04-1165340-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验