• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙巴利阿里群岛健康促进学校(CEPS)计划评价。

Evaluation of the Health Promoting Schools (CEPS) Program in the Balearic Islands, Spain.

机构信息

Balearic Islands Public Health Department, 07010 Palma, Spain.

Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdisBa), 07120 Palma, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710756.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph191710756
PMID:36078479
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9517870/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the structure, process, and results obtained by the CEPS Program.

METHODS

We combined quantitative and qualitative methods. We reviewed our databases, the health projects and reports sent by the schools, and the notes taken during the assessment visits to the schools. We included all the schools participating in the CEPS Program between 2014-2015 and 2018-2019 for structure purposes, but only those participating for at least two years for the process and results. We used a descriptive analysis as well as a content analysis.

RESULTS

84 schools participated in the CEPS Program. Attrition (24%) occurred mainly after the first year. Most schools performed at least one situation analysis (88.1%) and had at least one teacher trained (73.8%). One of three obtained a certificate (35.7%) or grant (38.1%). For the process and results, we selected 44 schools. Teachers' participation stood out (61.4% transformative and 38% representative) over the participation of other agents. The coordination of the health committee with other committees and with other local resources was a crucial element. Of the schools, 40.9% had high quality projects, 50% medium, and 9.1% low. Of the schools, 40.9% showed positive health results.

CONCLUSION

We identified the characteristics of high-quality health-promoting schools.

摘要

目的

评估 CEPS 计划的结构、过程和结果。

方法

我们结合了定量和定性方法。我们查阅了我们的数据库、学校发送的卫生项目和报告,以及在对学校进行评估访问时的记录。我们将 2014-2015 年至 2018-2019 年期间参加 CEPS 计划的所有学校都纳入结构目的,但仅将至少参加两年的学校纳入过程和结果。我们使用了描述性分析和内容分析。

结果

84 所学校参加了 CEPS 计划。(24%)的学生主要在第一年后流失。大多数学校至少进行了一次情况分析(88.1%),并至少培训了一名教师(73.8%)。三分之一的学校获得了证书(35.7%)或补助金(38.1%)。对于过程和结果,我们选择了 44 所学校。教师的参与(61.4%为变革性,38%为代表性)超过了其他参与者的参与。卫生委员会与其他委员会以及与其他当地资源的协调是一个关键要素。在这些学校中,40.9%的项目质量高,50%的项目质量中等,9.1%的项目质量低。在这些学校中,40.9%的学校显示出积极的健康结果。

结论

我们确定了高质量促进健康学校的特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3174/9517870/765deadb25d7/ijerph-19-10756-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3174/9517870/8bc732ebeced/ijerph-19-10756-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3174/9517870/765deadb25d7/ijerph-19-10756-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3174/9517870/8bc732ebeced/ijerph-19-10756-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3174/9517870/765deadb25d7/ijerph-19-10756-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Health Promoting Schools (CEPS) Program in the Balearic Islands, Spain.西班牙巴利阿里群岛健康促进学校(CEPS)计划评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710756.
2
Health-promoting educational settings in Taiwan: development and evaluation of the Health-Promoting School Accreditation System.台湾促进健康的教育环境:健康促进学校认证系统的发展与评估
Glob Health Promot. 2016 Mar;23(1 Suppl):18-25. doi: 10.1177/1757975916638286.
3
A process and outcome evaluation of an in-class vegetable promotion program.课堂蔬菜推广计划的过程和结果评估。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.023. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
4
Mondelēz Hope Kitchen Program, China: a Program Impact Pathways (PIP) analysis.亿滋中国希望厨房项目:项目影响路径(PIP)分析
Food Nutr Bull. 2014 Sep;35(3 Suppl):S117-23. doi: 10.1177/15648265140353S204.
5
[Health education in primary school: Alicante city (Spain) teachers' opinions].[西班牙阿利坎特市小学的健康教育:教师观点]
Gac Sanit. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.07.008. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
6
Involvement of high school teachers in Health Promoting School program in selected township, Yangon Region, Myanmar: A cross-sectional mixed methods study.缅甸仰光地区选定乡镇中学教师参与健康促进学校计划:一项横断面混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0270125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270125. eCollection 2022.
7
Introducing physically active lessons in UK secondary schools: feasibility study and pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial.在英国中学引入体育活动课程:可行性研究和试点群组随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 6;9(5):e025080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025080.
8
The equitable reach of a universal, multisector childhood obesity prevention program (Live Life Well @ School) in Australian primary schools.一项全民多部门儿童肥胖预防计划(“在学校健康生活”)在澳大利亚小学的公平覆盖范围。
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Mar 10;30(1):3012003. doi: 10.17061/phrp3012003.
9
[Design and pilot testing of a school-based emotional education program for health promotion and prevention for children from 3 to 5 years of age.].[针对3至5岁儿童的基于学校的促进健康和预防疾病的情感教育项目的设计与试点测试。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2022 Nov 8;96:e202211080.
10
[Evaluation of health promotion in schools in Spain].[西班牙学校健康促进评估]
Glob Health Promot. 2009 Sep;16(3):96-106. doi: 10.1177/1757975909339772.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Health Promotion in International Schools Using the Schools for Health in Europe (SHE) Rapid Assessment Tool.使用欧洲健康学校(SHE)快速评估工具对国际学校的健康促进进行评估。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;13(6):633. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060633.
2
The methodology of health education programs in schools-Qualitative study.学校健康教育项目的方法学——定性研究
Aten Primaria. 2024 Dec;56(12):103091. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103091. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

1
"Mummy, Can I Join a Sports Club?" A Qualitative Study on the Impact of Health-Promoting Schools on Health Behaviours in the Home Setting.“妈妈,我可以加入一个体育俱乐部吗?”一项关于促进健康学校对家庭环境中健康行为影响的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 21;18(22):12219. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212219.
2
Opportunities for Capacity Building to Create Healthy School Communities in the Netherlands: Focus Group Discussions With Dutch Pupils.荷兰创建健康学校社区的能力建设机会:荷兰学生的焦点小组讨论。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 29;9:630513. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.630513. eCollection 2021.
3
The barriers and enablers to implementing the New South Wales Healthy School Canteen Strategy in secondary schools in the Illawarra and Shoalhaven regions - A qualitative study.
新南威尔士州健康学校食堂战略在伊拉瓦拉和肖尔黑文地区中学实施的障碍和促进因素——一项定性研究。
Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Jul;33(3):686-695. doi: 10.1002/hpja.528. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
Health promotion in secondary schools: participatory process for constructing a self-assessment tool.中学健康促进:构建自我评估工具的参与式过程
Health Promot Int. 2022 Apr 29;37(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab123.
5
Health Promoting Schools in Germany. Mapping the Implementation of Holistic Strategies to Tackle NCDs and Promote Health.德国促进健康学校。绘制实施整体策略以应对非传染性疾病和促进健康的地图。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 5;18(5):2623. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052623.
6
From Consultation to Shared Decision-Making: Youth Engagement Strategies for Promoting School and Community Wellbeing.从咨询到共同决策:促进学校和社区健康的青年参与策略。
J Sch Health. 2020 Dec;90(12):976-984. doi: 10.1111/josh.12960.
7
[Literacy programs for the promotion of mental health in the school setting. SESPAS Report 2020].[学校环境中促进心理健康的扫盲计划。SESPAS 2020年报告]
Gac Sanit. 2020;34 Suppl 1:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
8
Family-Centered Health Promotion: Perspectives for Engaging Families and Achieving Better Health Outcomes.以家庭为中心的健康促进:让家庭参与并实现更好健康结果的视角
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020923537. doi: 10.1177/0046958020923537.
9
Danish 'add-in' school-based health promotion: integrating health in curriculum time.丹麦“附加式”学校健康促进:在课程时间中融入健康。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):e70-e77. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day095.
10
Guidelines for reporting evaluations based on observational methodology.基于观察性方法的评估报告指南。
Psicothema. 2015;27(3):283-9. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.276.