Marković Roberta, Ignjatović Aleksandra, Višnjić Aleksandar, Stojanović Miodrag, Andjelković Apostolović Marija, Otasević Suzana
Department for Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nis, Serbia.
Department for Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nis, Serbia.
Aten Primaria. 2024 Dec;56(12):103091. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103091. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
To assess strengths and weaknesses of the methodology of health education programs, carried out in the period 2010-2020, in schools in Serbia.
Qualitative study, a thematic analysis approach. SITE: Representatives of Public Health institutions, Serbian biggest nongovernmental organization, Youth organization, Ministry of education and municipality.
Nine professionals working in the field of Public Health and Health education.
Focus group gathered nine health and non-health professionals in 2022 year. Focus group was recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and analyzed by three research team members. A coding template evolved through the analysis, providing the expansion of key concepts. Themes were, one by one, extracted, encoded, classified as the smallest units and interpretive, thematic analysis was applied.
Although the Focus group in our study identified among other advantages, support of Health sector to Educational sector as crucial, it emphasized as well following weaknesses: Analyzed health education programs were implemented insufficiently as a separate process in schools, did not have the image of programs shared and integrated into community; Health education needs of schoolchildren, parents, and teachers should be examined prior the education implementation; Well-educated interdisciplinary educators have to be strengthened and supported; Parents participation is necessity; Standards and good practice guidelines are needed, and those developed through Health Promoting Schools program could be practiced.
It is necessary to support cross-curricular competence, where health education should be integrated into all school subjects, and should go far beyond the school, grow into a culture of community life, which will interconnect all stakeholders in strong Public Health network.
评估2010 - 2020年期间在塞尔维亚学校开展的健康教育项目方法的优缺点。
定性研究,采用主题分析方法。
公共卫生机构代表、塞尔维亚最大的非政府组织、青年组织、教育部和市政府。
九名从事公共卫生和健康教育领域工作的专业人员。
2022年,焦点小组召集了九名卫生和非卫生专业人员。焦点小组讨论进行了录音,逐字转录,由三名研究团队成员进行编码和分析。通过分析形成了一个编码模板,对关键概念进行了扩展。主题逐一提取、编码,归类为最小单元,并应用解释性主题分析。
尽管我们研究中的焦点小组指出了其他优势,其中卫生部门对教育部门的支持至关重要,但也强调了以下弱点:分析的健康教育项目在学校作为一个单独的过程实施不足,没有共享并融入社区的项目形象;在教育实施之前,应调查学童、家长和教师的健康教育需求;必须加强和支持受过良好教育的跨学科教育工作者;家长参与是必要的;需要标准和良好实践指南,通过健康促进学校项目制定的指南可以付诸实践。
有必要支持跨课程能力,将健康教育融入所有学校科目,并且应该超越学校范围,发展成为社区生活文化,这将在强大的公共卫生网络中连接所有利益相关者。