Suppr超能文献

两种不同类型的干针疗法对肩峰下撞击综合征的疗效比较。

Comparison of the effect of two different types of dry-needling techniques on subacromial impingement syndrome.

机构信息

Student Research Committee, Department of Physiotherapy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Jan;25:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.10.018. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Infraspinatus is one of the main muscles that is involved in the subacromial impingement syndrome. Dry needling and routine physical therapy can improve this syndrome. However, the dry needling technique is not well defined.

DESIGN

randomized controlled clinical trial, single-blind study.

METHOD

Sixty-six patients diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome were recruited and randomly divided into three groups.

INTERVENTIONS

In 1st group; patients received deep dry needling technique in addition to routine physical therapy, in Hong's group; patients received Hong's dry needling technique in addition to routine physiotherapy and in third group; patient just received routine physical therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Before, immediately after and 4 weeks after the intervention, pain, disability and the pressure pain threshold were measured.

RESULTS

The findings of this study indicated that in DDN group, pain and disability reduction was significantly more than two other groups. Although, the pressure pain tolerance increased in all three groups after treatment, but the increase between groups was not significantly different. All study groups showed reduction in pain, while there was no significant difference between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Pain and disability reduction in the DDN group compared to the other two groups may reveal the treatment with deep dry needling technique along with routine physiotherapy is more effective than receiving dry needling with Hong's technique or routine physiotherapy alone. However, there was no significant difference between the three groups in pressure pain tolerance threshold and pain reduction.

摘要

简介

冈下肌是参与肩峰下撞击综合征的主要肌肉之一。干针和常规物理疗法均可改善该综合征。然而,干针技术尚未明确定义。

设计

随机对照临床试验,单盲研究。

方法

共招募了 66 名诊断为肩撞击综合征的患者,并将其随机分为三组。

干预措施

在第 1 组中,患者在常规物理治疗的基础上接受深部干针技术治疗;在 Hong 组中,患者在常规物理治疗的基础上接受 Hong 的干针技术治疗;在第 3 组中,患者仅接受常规物理治疗。

主要观察指标

干预前、干预即刻和干预 4 周后,测量疼痛、残疾和压痛阈。

结果

本研究结果表明,在 DDN 组中,疼痛和残疾的减轻明显多于其他两组。尽管所有三组治疗后压痛阈值均有增加,但组间增加无显著差异。所有研究组均表现出疼痛减轻,但三组之间无显著差异。

结论

与其他两组相比,DDN 组的疼痛和残疾减轻可能表明深部干针技术联合常规物理治疗的疗效优于接受 Hong 技术干针或单独常规物理治疗。然而,三组之间在压痛阈值和疼痛减轻方面没有显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验