Suppr超能文献

针刺与其他疗法治疗肩袖疾病的疗效比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Efficacy comparison between acupuncture and other modalities in the treatment of rotator cuff diseases: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Zhang Hai-Ning, Chen Jian-Ge, Wang Xiao-Yu, Fan Shun, Bao An, Li Hua-Nan, Wang Jin-Gui

机构信息

Tuina Department, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion Tianjin, The People's Republic of China.

Orthopedics Department, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion Tianjin, The People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):599-616. doi: 10.62347/NCRJ1270. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of acupuncture alone or combined with physical therapy compared to other treatment interventions for relieving pain and improving function in rotator cuff diseases.

METHODS

Our study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After PROSPERO (CRD42023396740) registration, all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from the inception of the databases to October 10, 2023, evaluating the efficacy of acupuncture either alone or in combination with physical therapy for treating rotator cuff diseases, were extracted from seven databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP), and the Wanfang Date. Two independent researchers assessed the quality of the included studies and extracted relevant data. Furthermore, a meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 14 software.

RESULTS

We included 13 RCTs - 12 published in English and 1 in Chinese - that enrolled 1,371 patients. The meta-analysis results demonstrated that acupuncture alone or in combination with physical therapy was superior to other interventions for short-term shoulder joint function improvement (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.82, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -1.28 to -0.35, = 0.001), medium-term shoulder joint function improvement (SMD = -1.00, 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.38, = 0.002), short-term pain relief (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.37, 95% CI: -2.39 to -0.38, = 0.006), medium-term pain relief (WMD = -1.66, 95% CI: -2.70 to -0.63, = 0.002), and post-treatment shoulder joint abduction improvements (SMD = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.20 to 1.16, = 0.005), external rotation (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.13 to 1.11, = 0.012), and forward flexion (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.97, < 0.001), with significant differences ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on the current clinical data, meta-analysis showed that acupuncture alone or combined with physical therapy is efficacious for short- and medium-term (< 3 months) pain relief and functional improvements. However, compared to other interventions, the efficacy of the long-term (3 to 12 months) period did not significantly differ. After treatment, these modalities displayed advantages such as improved shoulder joint abduction, external rotation, and forward flexion movements. However, no significant difference was noted in internal rotation movement. Thus, future studies might further investigate whether different acupuncture methods affect the efficacy of treating rotator cuff diseases and improving long-term outcome.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析与其他治疗干预措施相比,单独使用针灸或结合物理治疗缓解肩袖疾病疼痛和改善功能的疗效。

方法

我们的研究遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。在PROSPERO(CRD42023396740)注册后,从包括PubMed、Embase、科学网、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网(CNKI)、中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)和万方数据在内的七个数据库中提取从数据库建立到2023年10月10日发表的所有评估单独使用针灸或结合物理治疗治疗肩袖疾病疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。两名独立研究人员评估纳入研究的质量并提取相关数据。此外,使用Stata 14软件进行Meta分析。

结果

我们纳入了13项RCT(12项英文发表,1项中文发表),共纳入1371例患者。Meta分析结果表明,单独使用针灸或结合物理治疗在改善短期肩关节功能方面优于其他干预措施(标准化均数差[SMD]=-0.82,95%置信区间[95%CI]:-1.28至-0.35,P=0.001)、中期肩关节功能改善(SMD=-1.00,95%CI:-1.62至-0.38,P=0.002)、短期疼痛缓解(加权均数差[WMD]=-1.37,95%CI:-2.39至-0.38,P=0.006)、中期疼痛缓解(WMD=-1.66,95%CI:-2.70至-0.63,P=0.002)以及治疗后肩关节外展改善(SMD=0.68,95%CI:0.20至1.16,P=0.005)、外旋(SMD=0.62,95%CI:0.13至1.11,P=0.012)和前屈(SMD=0.71,95%CI:0.44至0.97,P<0.001),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

基于目前的临床数据,Meta分析表明,单独使用针灸或结合物理治疗在短期和中期(<3个月)缓解疼痛和改善功能方面是有效的。然而,与其他干预措施相比,长期(3至12个月)的疗效没有显著差异。治疗后,这些方法显示出改善肩关节外展、外旋和前屈运动等优势。然而,内旋运动没有显著差异。因此,未来的研究可能会进一步探讨不同的针灸方法是否会影响治疗肩袖疾病的疗效和改善长期预后。

相似文献

2
Manual therapy and exercise for rotator cuff disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 10;2016(6):CD012224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012224.
4
Electrotherapy modalities for rotator cuff disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 10;2016(6):CD012225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012225.
5
Effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 4;25(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07445-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Electroacupuncture combined with rehabilitation techniques for patients with rotator cuff injury.
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Jun 16;13(17):98692. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i17.98692.

本文引用的文献

3
Dry Needling for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Pain Med. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):285-299. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac131.
5
A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Subacromial Syndrome.
Biology (Basel). 2022 Feb 4;11(2):243. doi: 10.3390/biology11020243.
6
7
Immediate Effects of Dry Needling on the Autonomic Nervous System and Mechanical Hyperalgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 3;18(11):6018. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116018.
9
Comparison of the effect of two different types of dry-needling techniques on subacromial impingement syndrome.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Jan;25:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.10.018. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验