• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析中国 COVID-19 大流行防控治理政策和政治制度的特点。

Analyzing the Characteristics of Policies and Political Institutions for the Prevention and Control Governance of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from China.

机构信息

School of Public Administration, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.

School of Marxism, Tongling University, Tongling 244061, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):10980. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710980.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph191710980
PMID:36078703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9518029/
Abstract

This study explores the institutional reasons for and logical mechanism of the Chinese government's rapid positive results and major strategic achievements in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic prevention and control. Based on the ROST Content Mining System version 6.0 (ROST) and VOSviewer V1.6.1 (VOSviewer), we conduct an econometric visualization analysis of COVID-19 pandemic prevention and control policies to explore which strengths of Chinese political institutions have been brought into play by the Chinese government and how to systematically analyze the approaches by which these strengths support effective public governance. The findings show that: (1) "institutional strength", "medical terminology", "policy content", "policy implementation object", "policy implementation requirement", and "policy-making and implementation actor" are the six groups of high-frequency keywords in prevention and control policies. (2) The occurrences, links, and total link strength of the seven Chinese institutional strength keywords are very high. These results mean that the Chinese government has made full use of its institutional strengths to prevent and control COVID-19. These findings indicate that institutional strengths are critical to public health crisis prevention and control. They also illustrate that institutional strength is the prerequisite and key factor for achieving effective governance in the policy process. Scientific policymaking, efficient policy implementation, and strict oversight are undeniably necessary for effective governance during public health crises.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨中国政府在新冠肺炎疫情防控中取得快速积极成果和重大战略成就的制度原因和逻辑机制。基于 ROST Content Mining System 版本 6.0(ROST)和 VOSviewer V1.6.1(VOSviewer),我们对疫情防控政策进行了计量可视化分析,以探讨中国政府发挥了哪些政治制度优势,以及如何系统分析这些优势支持有效公共治理的途径。研究结果表明:(1)“制度优势”“医学术语”“政策内容”“政策实施对象”“政策实施要求”和“政策制定和实施主体”是防控政策中的六个高频关键词组。(2)中国七大制度优势关键词的出现频次、联系度和总联系强度都非常高。这些结果表明,中国政府充分利用了制度优势来防控新冠肺炎疫情。这表明制度优势对于公共卫生危机防控至关重要。同时也说明,制度优势是政策过程中实现有效治理的前提和关键因素。科学决策、高效执行和严格监督对于公共卫生危机期间的有效治理是不可或缺的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0c/9518029/0f3bb8da903a/ijerph-19-10980-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0c/9518029/f477e6995180/ijerph-19-10980-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0c/9518029/d20d92b0c482/ijerph-19-10980-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0c/9518029/a2c36cf2108e/ijerph-19-10980-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0c/9518029/5759e698d628/ijerph-19-10980-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0c/9518029/0f3bb8da903a/ijerph-19-10980-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0c/9518029/f477e6995180/ijerph-19-10980-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0c/9518029/d20d92b0c482/ijerph-19-10980-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0c/9518029/a2c36cf2108e/ijerph-19-10980-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0c/9518029/5759e698d628/ijerph-19-10980-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0c/9518029/0f3bb8da903a/ijerph-19-10980-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Analyzing the Characteristics of Policies and Political Institutions for the Prevention and Control Governance of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from China.分析中国 COVID-19 大流行防控治理政策和政治制度的特点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):10980. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710980.
2
Requestioning the Indonesia Government's Public Policy Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Black Box Analysis for the Period of January-July 2020.质疑印尼政府对 COVID-19 大流行的公共政策反应:2020 年 1 月至 7 月期间的黑箱分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 10;9:612994. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.612994. eCollection 2021.
3
Mechanisms of the Chinese Government's Efforts to Fight COVID-19: Integration of Top-Down Interventions and Local Governance.中国政府抗击新冠肺炎的机制:自上而下的干预与地方治理的融合。
Health Secur. 2022 Jul-Aug;20(4):348-356. doi: 10.1089/hs.2021.0161. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
4
China's Public Health Policies in Response to COVID-19: From an "Authoritarian" Perspective.中国应对 COVID-19 的公共卫生政策:从“威权主义”的角度。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 15;9:756677. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.756677. eCollection 2021.
5
What accounts for the different regional responses to COVID-19 in China? Exploring the role of institutional environment, governance capacity and legitimacy.中国各地区对 COVID-19 为何会有不同的反应?探究制度环境、治理能力和合法性的作用。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Apr 11;38(4):552-566. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad007.
6
Institutional Network Relationship of Chinese Public Crisis Governance System-Based on the Quantitative Comparative Analysis of Policies during SARS and COVID-19.中国公共危机治理体系的制度网络关系——基于 SARS 和 COVID-19 期间政策的定量比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 16;19(22):15100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215100.
7
Study on the logic and effectiveness of crisis learning in the promotion policy adjustment: an observation based on the adjustment of COVID-19 prevention policy in China.关于危机学习在促进政策调整中的逻辑和效果的研究:基于中国新冠肺炎疫情防控政策调整的观察。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1324420. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1324420. eCollection 2023.
8
Investigating the influence of institutions, politics, organizations, and governance on the COVID-19 response in British Columbia, Canada: a jurisdictional case study protocol.研究加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的机构、政治、组织和治理对 COVID-19 应对措施的影响:一个司法管辖区的案例研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jun 21;20(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00868-5.
9
Quantifying Health Policy Uncertainty in China Using Newspapers: Text Mining Study.使用报纸量化中国的卫生政策不确定性:文本挖掘研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 14;25:e46589. doi: 10.2196/46589.
10
How China controls the Covid-19 epidemic through public health expenditure and policy?中国如何通过公共卫生支出和政策控制新冠疫情?
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):437-449. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2054202.

引用本文的文献

1
How do online users perceive health risks during public health emergencies? Empirical evidence from China.网络用户在突发公共卫生事件期间如何看待健康风险?来自中国的实证证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 27;14:1087229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1087229. eCollection 2023.
2
Analyst Site Visits and Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure: Evidence from China.分析师现场调研与企业环境信息披露:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 4;19(23):16223. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316223.

本文引用的文献

1
How Policy Mix Choices Affect the COVID-19 Pandemic Response Outcomes in Chinese Cities: An Empirical Analysis.政策组合选择如何影响中国城市的 COVID-19 大流行应对结果:一项实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;19(13):8094. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138094.
2
Analysis and Visualization of Research on Resilient Cities and Communities Based on VOSviewer.基于 VOSviewer 的韧性城市和社区研究分析与可视化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;19(12):7068. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127068.
3
Resilient Health and the Healthcare System. A Few Introductory Remarks in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
韧性健康与医疗保健系统。新冠疫情时代的几点引言
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 18;19(6):3603. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063603.
4
Characterizing the Dynamic Evolution of Interagency Collaborative Decision-Making Networks in Response to COVID-19 in China: A Policy Document Analysis.刻画中国应对新冠疫情期间跨部门协同决策网络的动态演变:政策文件分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 21;10(3):590. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030590.
5
Government dissemination of epidemic information as a policy instrument during COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Chinese cities.新冠疫情期间政府发布疫情信息作为一项政策工具:来自中国城市的证据
Cities. 2022 Jun;125:103658. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103658. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
6
COVID-19 related substance use services policy changes: Policymaker perspectives on policy development & implementation.与 COVID-19 相关的物质使用服务政策变化:政策制定者对政策制定和实施的看法。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Feb;133:108550. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108550. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
7
Economic Consequences of the COVID-19 Outbreak: the Need for Epidemic Preparedness.COVID-19 疫情爆发的经济后果:需要做好防疫准备。
Front Public Health. 2020 May 29;8:241. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00241. eCollection 2020.
8
COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives.新冠疫情与政策科学:初步反应与观点
Policy Sci. 2020;53(2):225-241. doi: 10.1007/s11077-020-09381-4. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
9
Natural disasters, armed conflict, and public health.自然灾害、武装冲突与公共卫生。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 7;369(19):1836-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1109877.
10
Positive interactions promote public cooperation.积极互动促进公众合作。
Science. 2009 Sep 4;325(5945):1272-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1177418.