Jinghua Gao, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Researcher, Centre for Social Investment, Max Weber Institute of Sociology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg. Germany.
Pengfei Zhang, PhD, School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
Health Secur. 2022 Jul-Aug;20(4):348-356. doi: 10.1089/hs.2021.0161. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
The experiences and lessons of China's response to COVID-19 have been described in several studies, but the mechanisms of the Chinese government's efforts to fight COVID-19 have not been well characterized. Despite strong policy directives and orders from the central government, the response and handling of the epidemic also reflected distinctive characteristics of local governments in terms of their governance systems and capacities. In this article, we analyze public health policies and mechanisms of the Chinese government's response to COVID-19 based on the integration of top-down and local governance. A compendium of key events and measures provides the foundation for our analysis. Mechanisms related to leadership, emergency response, centralized mobilization, and accountability fully reflect the decisive measures for top-down interventions in the face of emergencies. China's policies and mechanisms to address the COVID-19 pandemic are consistent with its party-state bureaucracy and socioeconomic context. However, lower levels of government have used "repeated increments" and "one-size-fits-all" practices in the implementation of antiepidemic policies. Conservative local officials are more averse to social innovation and favor strict controls to manage the pandemic. Moreover, even under a unified system, there are substantial differences in the capacity and level of crisis management among local governments, especially in the mobilization of nonprofit organizations and volunteers. In this case study, we aim to expand the existing understanding of the tension between top-down interventions and local governance innovations.
中国应对 COVID-19 的经验和教训在几项研究中都有描述,但中国政府抗击 COVID-19 努力的机制尚未得到很好的描述。尽管中央政府发布了强有力的政策指令和命令,但疫情的应对和处理也反映了地方政府在治理体系和能力方面的独特特征。在本文中,我们根据上下治理的整合,分析了中国政府应对 COVID-19 的公共卫生政策和机制。重要事件和措施的汇编为我们的分析提供了基础。与领导、应急响应、集中动员和问责制相关的机制充分反映了面对突发事件时自上而下干预的果断措施。中国应对 COVID-19 大流行的政策和机制与其政党国家官僚机构和社会经济背景相一致。然而,较低级别的政府在实施防疫政策时采用了“反复增量”和“一刀切”的做法。保守的地方官员更不愿意进行社会创新,而是倾向于严格控制来管理疫情。此外,即使在统一的制度下,地方政府在危机管理能力和水平方面也存在很大差异,特别是在非营利组织和志愿者的动员方面。在这个案例研究中,我们旨在扩大对自上而下的干预和地方治理创新之间的紧张关系的现有理解。