• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有意暴露不可吸收的d-聚四氟乙烯膜或引导骨再生治疗种植体支持修复的拔牙后牙槽骨缺损后骨的组织形态计量学:一项初步随机对照试验。

Histomorphometry of Bone after Intentionally Exposed Non-Resorbable d-PTFE Membrane or Guided Bone Regeneration for the Treatment of Post-Extractive Alveolar Bone Defects with Implant-Supported Restorations: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Luongo Roberto, Tallarico Marco, Canciani Elena, Graziano Daniele, Dellavia Claudia, Gargari Marco, Ceruso Francesco Mattia, Melodia Dario, Canullo Luigi

机构信息

Arthur Ashman Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, NYU College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA.

Independent Researcher, 70100 Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;15(17):5838. doi: 10.3390/ma15175838.

DOI:10.3390/ma15175838
PMID:36079220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9457509/
Abstract

: The aim of the present study was to investigate quantitative histological examination of bone reconstructed with non-resorbable high-density polytetrafluoroethylene membrane (d-PTFE), left intentionally exposed in post extraction sockets grafted with anorganic bone material, and removed after four weeks, versus extraction and guided bone regeneration (GBR), performed two months later. : This study was designed as a multicenter randomized controlled trial of parallel-group design. Patients were selected and consecutively treated in three centers in Italy. Patients randomly received intentionally exposed non-resorbable d-PTFE membrane (group A), or guided bone regeneration (group B), to treat post-extractive alveolar bone defects with implant-supported restorations. Outcomes were: the implant failure, any mechanical and biological complications, patient satisfaction, and qualitative and histomorphometric evaluation of the collected bone samples. : Eighteen patients were consecutively enrolled in the trial. Of these, six out of 18 patients were male. All the included patients were treated according to the allocated interventions, and no drop out occurred. No implant failure and no complications were experienced, and all the patients were fully satisfied with the function and aesthetic of their implant-supported restoration, without difference between groups. Morphological analysis revealed no sign of tissue reaction, such as fibrosis or necrosis. Regenerated bone was well mineralized in both groups, but it seemed more mature in group B than in group A. Three samples showed a minimal number of lymphocytes. Several blood vessels of small size occupied the medullary spaces, where the tissue resulted in more maturity, indicating the activity of the tissue in progress. The histomorphometric evaluation showed no statistically significant differences in the tissue volume fractions between the two groups of patients. : With the limitation of the present study, buccal plate reconstruction with an intentionally exposed non-resorbable membrane is an effective and easy procedure for regenerating a resorbed buccal bone plate, reducing the need for guided bone regeneration.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查用不可吸收的高密度聚四氟乙烯膜(d-PTFE)重建骨组织的定量组织学检查结果。该膜在植入无机骨材料的拔牙窝中故意暴露,四周后取出,与两个月后进行的拔牙并引导骨再生(GBR)进行对比。

本研究设计为平行组设计的多中心随机对照试验。在意大利的三个中心选择患者并进行连续治疗。患者随机接受故意暴露的不可吸收d-PTFE膜(A组)或引导骨再生(B组),以治疗种植体支持修复的拔牙后牙槽骨缺损。观察指标包括:种植体失败情况、任何机械和生物学并发症、患者满意度以及对采集的骨样本进行定性和组织形态计量学评估。

共有18名患者连续纳入该试验。其中,18名患者中有6名男性。所有纳入患者均按照分配的干预措施进行治疗,无失访情况。未发生种植体失败和并发症,所有患者对种植体支持修复的功能和美观均完全满意,两组之间无差异。形态学分析未发现组织反应迹象,如纤维化或坏死。两组再生骨均矿化良好,但B组似乎比A组更成熟。三个样本显示淋巴细胞数量极少。几个小血管占据了骨髓腔,此处组织更成熟,表明组织正在进行活跃的活动。组织形态计量学评估显示,两组患者的组织体积分数无统计学显著差异。

鉴于本研究的局限性,用故意暴露的不可吸收膜进行颊板重建是再生吸收的颊骨板的一种有效且简便的方法,减少了引导骨再生的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/d47b2db14adb/materials-15-05838-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/e4c7eb5e620f/materials-15-05838-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/294e966912d9/materials-15-05838-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/50929a018d1e/materials-15-05838-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/dc02bda53448/materials-15-05838-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/a4a39edb19cc/materials-15-05838-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/8aa3841a338f/materials-15-05838-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/04be276f7d2d/materials-15-05838-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/2bdd00f9a3ca/materials-15-05838-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/d29f2238376c/materials-15-05838-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/a3a6fb39515c/materials-15-05838-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/b0582dbc11e6/materials-15-05838-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/f1bc21ad20c5/materials-15-05838-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/d47b2db14adb/materials-15-05838-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/e4c7eb5e620f/materials-15-05838-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/294e966912d9/materials-15-05838-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/50929a018d1e/materials-15-05838-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/dc02bda53448/materials-15-05838-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/a4a39edb19cc/materials-15-05838-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/8aa3841a338f/materials-15-05838-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/04be276f7d2d/materials-15-05838-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/2bdd00f9a3ca/materials-15-05838-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/d29f2238376c/materials-15-05838-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/a3a6fb39515c/materials-15-05838-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/b0582dbc11e6/materials-15-05838-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/f1bc21ad20c5/materials-15-05838-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b199/9457509/d47b2db14adb/materials-15-05838-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
Histomorphometry of Bone after Intentionally Exposed Non-Resorbable d-PTFE Membrane or Guided Bone Regeneration for the Treatment of Post-Extractive Alveolar Bone Defects with Implant-Supported Restorations: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.有意暴露不可吸收的d-聚四氟乙烯膜或引导骨再生治疗种植体支持修复的拔牙后牙槽骨缺损后骨的组织形态计量学:一项初步随机对照试验。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;15(17):5838. doi: 10.3390/ma15175838.
2
Guided bone regeneration with and without a bone substitute at single post-extractive implants: 1-year post-loading results from a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial.单颗拔牙后种植体使用与不使用骨替代材料的引导骨再生:一项实用多中心随机对照试验的加载后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011 Winter;4(4):313-25.
3
Immediate loading of post-extractive versus delayed placed single implants in the anterior maxilla: outcome of a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial 1-year after loading.上颌前部拔牙后即刻种植与延期种植单颗种植体的即刻负重:一项实用多中心随机对照试验负重1年后的结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Winter;8(4):347-58.
4
Socket grafting with or without buccal augmentation with anorganic bovine bone at immediate post-extractive implants: 6-month after loading results from a multicenter randomised controlled clinical trial.拔牙后即刻种植时使用或不使用无机牛骨进行颊侧增量的牙槽窝植骨:多中心随机对照临床试验加载6个月后的结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Autumn;6(3):239-50.
5
Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial.上颌前部保存牙槽窝内即刻种植体即刻非咬合负重与延期种植的比较:一项随机对照试验的负重后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Winter;8(4):361-72.
6
Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 4-month post-loading results from a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial.上颌前部保留牙槽窝内即刻种植体即刻非咬合负重与延期种植的比较:一项实用多中心随机对照试验的负重后4个月结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011 Winter;4(4):329-44.
7
Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years.使用可吸收和不可吸收膜引导骨再生(GBR)植入物12 - 14年后的长期结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Oct;24(10):1065-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02522.x. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
8
One-stage horizontal guided bone regeneration with autologous bone, anorganic bovine bone and collagen membranes: Follow-up of a prospective study 30 months after loading.自体骨、无机牛骨和胶原膜一期水平引导骨再生:种植体负载30个月后的前瞻性研究随访
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):89-95.
9
Management of the exposure of a dense PTFE (d-PTFE) membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR): a case report.引导骨再生(GBR)中致密聚四氟乙烯(d-PTFE)膜暴露的处理:一例病例报告。
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2017 Nov 30;10(3):335-342. doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.3.335. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
10
Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.评价非吸收性膜引导骨再生与钛网和可吸收膜引导骨再生后并发症发生率和垂直骨增量的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Oct;19(5):821-832. doi: 10.1111/cid.12520. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Bone Modeling after Orthodontic Extrusion: A Histomorphometric Pilot Study.正畸牙齿伸长后的骨改建:一项组织形态计量学初步研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 9;11(24):7329. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247329.

本文引用的文献

1
Postextraction ridge preservation by using dense PTFE membranes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用高密度聚四氟乙烯膜进行拔牙后牙槽嵴保存:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Mar;131(3):410-419. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.02.021. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
2
Understanding the Role of Surface Modification of Randomized Trabecular Titanium Structures in Bone Tissue Regeneration: An Experimental Study.理解随机多孔钛结构表面改性在骨组织再生中的作用:一项实验研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 18;58(2):315. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020315.
3
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.
缺失牙的修复干预:用于种植体位点开发的牙槽嵴保存技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 26;4(4):CD010176. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010176.pub3.
4
Biological Oriented Immediate Loading: A New Mathematical Implant Vertical Insertion Protocol, Five-Year Follow-Up Study.生物导向即刻负重:一种新的种植体垂直植入数学方案,五年随访研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 14;14(2):387. doi: 10.3390/ma14020387.
5
The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study.使用不可吸收膜作为牙槽嵴保存的封闭屏障:一项为期一年的随访前瞻性队列研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Mar 3;9(3):110. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9030110.
6
Alveolar ridge preservation using an open membrane approach for sockets with bone deficiency: A randomized controlled clinical trial.采用开放式骨膜转移技术保存牙槽嵴用于骨量不足牙槽窝的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Feb;21(1):175-182. doi: 10.1111/cid.12668. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
7
One-stage horizontal guided bone regeneration with autologous bone, anorganic bovine bone and collagen membranes: Follow-up of a prospective study 30 months after loading.自体骨、无机牛骨和胶原膜一期水平引导骨再生:种植体负载30个月后的前瞻性研究随访
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):89-95.
8
Molar replacement with 7 mm-wide diameter implants: to place the implant immediately or to wait 4 months after socket preservation? 
1 year after loading results from a randomised controlled trial.使用直径7毫米的种植体进行磨牙替代:即刻植入种植体还是在牙槽窝保存后等待4个月?随机对照试验加载1年后的结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(2):169-178.
9
Histomorphometric Results After Postextraction Socket Healing with Different Biomaterials: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.不同生物材料用于拔牙创愈合后的组织形态计量学结果:文献系统评价与Meta分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 September/October;32(5):1001–1017. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5263. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
10
Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late?拔牙后即刻、早期和晚期在美学单牙位点植入的位置:何时进行?
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):84-102. doi: 10.1111/prd.12170.