• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

边缘骨丢失进展对不同种植体-基台连接和基台材料中应力分布的影响:一项三维有限元分析研究

Effects of Marginal Bone Loss Progression on Stress Distribution in Different Implant-Abutment Connections and Abutment Materials: A 3D Finite Element Analysis Study.

作者信息

Lin Ching-Ping, Shyu Yi-Ting, Wu Yu-Ling, Tsai Ming-Hsu, Chen Hung-Shyong, Wu Aaron Yu-Jen

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;15(17):5866. doi: 10.3390/ma15175866.

DOI:10.3390/ma15175866
PMID:36079245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9457366/
Abstract

Peri-implantitis is a common implant-supported prosthesis complication, and marginal bone loss affects the stress distribution in implant systems. This three-dimensional finite element analysis study investigated how bone loss affects the implant assembly; in particular, models including two implant systems with different connection systems (external or internal hexagon), abutment materials (titanium or zirconia), and bone loss levels (0, 1.5, 3, or 5 mm) were created. We observed that the maximum von Mises stress distinctly increased in the groups with bone loss over 1.5 mm compared to the group without bone loss, regardless of the connection system or abutment material used. Moreover, the screw stress patterns with bone loss progression were determined more by the connection systems than by the abutment materials, and the magnitude of the stress on the fixture was affected by the connection systems with a similar pattern. The highest stress on the screw with the external hexagon connection system increased over 25% when bone loss increased from 3 to 5 mm, exceeding the yield strength of the titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) when 5 mm bone loss exists; clinically, this situation may result in screw loosening or fracture. The highest stress on the fixture, exceeding the yield strength of pure titanium, was noted with the internal hexagon connection system and 1.5 mm bone loss. Titanium and zirconia abutments-both of which are clinically durable-presented similar screw and fixture stress patterns. Therefore, clinicians should pay more attention to maintaining the peri-implant bone to achieve the long-term stability of the implant-supported prosthesis.

摘要

种植体周围炎是一种常见的种植体支持义齿并发症,边缘骨丧失会影响种植体系统的应力分布。这项三维有限元分析研究调查了骨丧失如何影响种植体组件;具体而言,创建了包括两种具有不同连接系统(外六角或内六角)、基台材料(钛或氧化锆)以及骨丧失水平(0、1.5、3或5毫米)的种植体系统的模型。我们观察到,与无骨丧失组相比,骨丧失超过1.5毫米的组中最大冯·米塞斯应力明显增加,无论使用何种连接系统或基台材料。此外,随着骨丧失进展,螺钉应力模式更多地由连接系统而非基台材料决定,并且种植体上的应力大小受连接系统影响,呈现相似模式。当骨丧失从3毫米增加到5毫米时,外六角连接系统的螺钉上的最高应力增加超过25%,当存在5毫米骨丧失时超过了钛合金(Ti-6Al-4V)的屈服强度;临床上,这种情况可能导致螺钉松动或断裂。在内六角连接系统和1.5毫米骨丧失的情况下,种植体上的最高应力超过了纯钛的屈服强度。钛和氧化锆基台在临床上都耐用,呈现出相似的螺钉和种植体应力模式。因此,临床医生应更加重视维持种植体周围骨组织,以实现种植体支持义齿的长期稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/eb3f1eee1c92/materials-15-05866-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/5e5a9062d192/materials-15-05866-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/b7b9067e7334/materials-15-05866-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/6aeaed2437ee/materials-15-05866-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/f1351cff5c83/materials-15-05866-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/a1a8bff2d052/materials-15-05866-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/6c17d8fb1dab/materials-15-05866-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/8e216227f06d/materials-15-05866-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/dfd2597dca32/materials-15-05866-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/6340ddb300ed/materials-15-05866-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/77ed8a5a92a6/materials-15-05866-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/17a6d233986b/materials-15-05866-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/017e8fb24766/materials-15-05866-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/a3af32b074fb/materials-15-05866-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/b430689a5937/materials-15-05866-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/eb3f1eee1c92/materials-15-05866-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/5e5a9062d192/materials-15-05866-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/b7b9067e7334/materials-15-05866-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/6aeaed2437ee/materials-15-05866-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/f1351cff5c83/materials-15-05866-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/a1a8bff2d052/materials-15-05866-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/6c17d8fb1dab/materials-15-05866-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/8e216227f06d/materials-15-05866-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/dfd2597dca32/materials-15-05866-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/6340ddb300ed/materials-15-05866-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/77ed8a5a92a6/materials-15-05866-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/17a6d233986b/materials-15-05866-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/017e8fb24766/materials-15-05866-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/a3af32b074fb/materials-15-05866-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/b430689a5937/materials-15-05866-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6166/9457366/eb3f1eee1c92/materials-15-05866-g015.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Marginal Bone Loss Progression on Stress Distribution in Different Implant-Abutment Connections and Abutment Materials: A 3D Finite Element Analysis Study.边缘骨丢失进展对不同种植体-基台连接和基台材料中应力分布的影响:一项三维有限元分析研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;15(17):5866. doi: 10.3390/ma15175866.
2
Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.平台连接和基台材料对单颗前牙种植支持修复体应力分布的影响:非线性三维有限元分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1096-102. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 May 13.
3
Biomechanical Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants in the All-on-4 Treatment with Different Implant-Abutment Connections: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.不同种植体-基台连接方式的全口4颗种植体治疗中钛牙种植体的生物力学分析:一项三维有限元研究
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Oct 12;14(10):515. doi: 10.3390/jfb14100515.
4
Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.带内连接和外连接的种植体基台的窄径氧化锆种植体的抗折强度:钛树脂基台概念的研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Apr;29(4):411-423. doi: 10.1111/clr.13139. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
5
Effect of Different Customized Abutment Types on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported Single Crown: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.不同定制基台类型对种植单冠应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析
J Prosthodont. 2022 Jun;31(5):e2-e11. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13530. Epub 2022 May 16.
6
Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.基于三维有限元分析的种植体支持的单冠中不同种植体-基台连接、固位系统和修复材料的生物力学评价。
J Oral Implantol. 2022 Jun 1;48(3):194-201. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00328.
7
Implant Volume Loss, Misfit, Screw Loosening, and Stress In Custom Titanium and Zirconia Abutments.定制钛和氧化锆基台中的种植体体积损失、贴合不良、螺钉松动及应力
Braz Dent J. 2020 Sep 4;31(4):374-379. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202003643.
8
Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.常规与平台转换:不同种植体类型的骨应力量分析。
J Prosthodont. 2012 Apr;21(3):160-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00801.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
9
A Comparison of Torque Stress on Abutment Screw of External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant.外六角与莫氏锥度种植体基台螺钉的扭矩应力比较
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Nov 1;19(11):1306-1311.
10
Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.两种种植体连接系统中基台螺钉预紧力的影响:三维有限元研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Nov;122(5):474.e1-474.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Internal and External Hexagon Connections in Immediately Loaded Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Multicenter Randomized Split-Mouth Controlled Trial With a 6-Year Follow-Up.即刻负重全牙弓修复中内外六角连接的评估:一项为期6年随访的多中心随机分口对照试验
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13416. doi: 10.1111/cid.13416. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
2
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in Dental Implant Prosthesis and Surrounding Bone Using PEEK Abutments.使用聚醚醚酮基台的牙种植修复体及周围骨应力分布的三维有限元分析
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Aug 3;9(8):472. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9080472.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation of Bone Material Model Using Voxel Mesh and Parametric Optimization.基于体素网格的骨材料模型相关性及参数优化
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 25;15(15):5163. doi: 10.3390/ma15155163.
2
Comparing the Fracture Resistance and Modes of Failure in Different Types of CAD/CAM Zirconia Abutments with Internal Hexagonal Implants: An In Vitro Study.不同类型带内六角种植体的CAD/CAM氧化锆基台的抗折性及失效模式比较:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 4;15(7):2656. doi: 10.3390/ma15072656.
3
Comparison of external, internal flat-to-flat, and conical implant abutment connections for implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Bone Regeneration and Polyetheretherketone Implants in Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Neurosurgery: A Multidisciplinary Study.
颌面外科和神经外科中的骨再生与聚醚醚酮植入物:一项多学科研究
Biology (Basel). 2024 Jun 25;13(7):467. doi: 10.3390/biology13070467.
种植体支持修复体的外部、内部平面到平面以及锥形种植体基台连接的比较:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Sep;130(3):327-340. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.029. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
4
Influence of Abutment Design on Stress Distribution in Narrow Implants with Marginal Bone Loss: A Finite Element Analysis.种植体边缘骨丧失时基台设计对种植体周围应力分布的影响:有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jul-Aug;36(4):640-649. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8554.
5
Biomechanical Properties of Bone and Mucosa for Design and Application of Dental Implants.用于牙种植体设计与应用的骨与黏膜的生物力学特性
Materials (Basel). 2021 May 26;14(11):2845. doi: 10.3390/ma14112845.
6
Effect of peri-implant bone resorption on mechanical stress in the implant body: In vivo measured load-based finite element analysis.种植体周围骨吸收对种植体体部机械应力的影响:基于体内测量的负载有限元分析。
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Dec;47(12):1566-1573. doi: 10.1111/joor.13097. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
Titanium implant wear from a zirconia custom abutment: A clinical report.氧化锆基台导致的钛种植体磨损:一份临床报告
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Feb;123(2):201-205. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.008. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
8
A systematic review of the influence of the implant-abutment connection on the clinical outcomes of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions.种植体-基台连接对支持固定种植体修复的陶瓷和金属种植体基台临床效果影响的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:160-183. doi: 10.1111/clr.13362.
9
Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions.种植体周围疾病和状况:2017 年牙周病和种植体周围病分类世界研讨会第 4 工作组的共识报告。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12957.
10
Peri-implantitis.种植体周围炎。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S246-S266. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12954.