Olorunwa Omolayo J, Adhikari Bikash, Brazel Skyler, Shi Ainong, Popescu Sorina C, Popescu George V, Barickman T Casey
North Mississippi Research and Extension Center, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Verona, MS 38879, USA.
Department of Horticulture, PTSC 316, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Plants (Basel). 2022 Sep 4;11(17):2315. doi: 10.3390/plants11172315.
Waterlogging is an important environmental stress limiting the productivity of crops worldwide. Cowpea ( L.) is particularly sensitive to waterlogging stress during the reproductive stage, with a consequent decline in pod formation and yield. However, little is known about the critical processes underlying cowpea's responses to waterlogging during the reproductive stage. Thus, we investigated the key parameters influencing carbon fixation, including stomatal conductance (g), intercellular CO concentration, chlorophyll content, and chlorophyll fluorescence, of two cowpea genotypes with contrasting waterlogging tolerance. These closely related genotypes have starkly contrasting responses to waterlogging during and after 7 days of waterlogging stress (DOW). In the intolerant genotype ('EpicSelect.4'), waterlogging resulted in a gradual loss of pigment and decreased photosynthetic capacity as a consequent decline in shoot biomass. On the other hand, the waterlogging-tolerant genotype ('UCR 369') maintained CO assimilation rate (), stomatal conductance (g), biomass, and chlorophyll content until 5 DOW. Moreover, there was a highly specific downregulation of the mesophyll conductance (g), maximum rate of Rubisco (V), and photosynthetic electron transport rate (J) as non-stomatal limiting factors decreasing in EpicSelect.4. Exposure of EpicSelect.4 to 2 DOW resulted in the loss of PSII photochemistry by downregulating the PSII quantum yield (F/F), photochemical efficiency (Φ), and photochemical quenching (qP). In contrast, we found no substantial change in the photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of UCR 369 in the first 5 DOW. Instead, UCR 369 maintained biomass accumulation, chlorophyll content, and Rubisco activity, enabling the genotype to maintain nutrient absorption and photosynthesis during the early period of waterlogging. However, compared to the control, both cowpea genotypes could not fully recover their photosynthetic capacity after 7 DOW, with a more significant decline in EpicSelect.4. Overall, our findings suggest that the tolerant UCR 369 genotype maintains higher photosynthesis under waterlogging stress attributable to higher photochemical efficiency, Rubisco activity, and less stomatal restriction. After recovery, the incomplete recovery of can be attributed to the reduced g caused by severe waterlogging damage in both genotypes. Thus, promoting the rapid recovery of stomata from waterlogging stress may be crucial for the complete restoration of carbon fixation in cowpeas during the reproductive stage.
涝害是一种重要的环境胁迫,限制了全球农作物的产量。豇豆在生殖阶段对涝害胁迫尤为敏感,导致结荚和产量下降。然而,关于豇豆在生殖阶段对涝害响应的关键过程知之甚少。因此,我们研究了影响两种耐涝性不同的豇豆基因型碳固定的关键参数,包括气孔导度(g)、胞间CO₂浓度、叶绿素含量和叶绿素荧光。这些密切相关的基因型在涝害胁迫7天期间及之后对涝害的反应截然不同。在不耐涝的基因型(‘EpicSelect.4’)中,涝害导致色素逐渐丧失,光合能力下降,进而地上部生物量减少。另一方面,耐涝基因型(‘UCR 369’)在涝害胁迫5天前维持了CO₂同化率(A)、气孔导度(g)、生物量和叶绿素含量。此外,在EpicSelect.4中,作为非气孔限制因素的叶肉导度(gm)、Rubisco最大羧化速率(Vcmax)和光合电子传递速率(J)出现了高度特异性的下调,导致A降低。将EpicSelect.4暴露于涝害胁迫2天导致通过下调PSII量子产率(Fv/Fm)、光化学效率(ΦPSII)和光化学猝灭(qP)而丧失PSII光化学活性。相比之下,我们发现UCR 369在前5天的光合作用和叶绿素荧光没有实质性变化。相反,UCR 369维持了生物量积累、叶绿素含量和Rubisco活性,使该基因型在涝害早期能够维持养分吸收和光合作用。然而,与对照相比,两种豇豆基因型在涝害胁迫7天后都不能完全恢复其光合能力,EpicSelect.4的下降更为显著。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,耐涝的UCR 369基因型在涝害胁迫下维持较高的光合作用,这归因于较高的光化学效率、Rubisco活性和较少的气孔限制。恢复后,A不能完全恢复可归因于两种基因型因严重涝害损伤导致的气孔导度降低。因此,促进气孔从涝害胁迫中快速恢复可能对豇豆生殖阶段碳固定的完全恢复至关重要。