Engineering Department, School of Science and Technology, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
Centre for Robotics in Industry and Intelligent Systems (CRIIS), INESC Technology and Science (INESCTEC), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 31;22(17):6574. doi: 10.3390/s22176574.
Hyperspectral aerial imagery is becoming increasingly available due to both technology evolution and a somewhat affordable price tag. However, selecting a proper UAV + hyperspectral sensor combo to use in specific contexts is still challenging and lacks proper documental support. While selecting an UAV is more straightforward as it mostly relates with sensor compatibility, autonomy, reliability and cost, a hyperspectral sensor has much more to be considered. This note provides an assessment of two hyperspectral sensors (push-broom and snapshot) regarding practicality and suitability, within a precision viticulture context. The aim is to provide researchers, agronomists, winegrowers and UAV pilots with dependable data collection protocols and methods, enabling them to achieve faster processing techniques and helping to integrate multiple data sources. Furthermore, both the benefits and drawbacks of using each technology within a precision viticulture context are also highlighted. Hyperspectral sensors, UAVs, flight operations, and the processing methodology for each imaging type' datasets are presented through a qualitative and quantitative analysis. For this purpose, four vineyards in two countries were selected as case studies. This supports the extrapolation of both advantages and issues related with the two types of hyperspectral sensors used, in different contexts. Sensors' performance was compared through the evaluation of field operations complexity, processing time and qualitative accuracy of the results, namely the quality of the generated hyperspectral mosaics. The results shown an overall excellent geometrical quality, with no distortions or overlapping faults for both technologies, using the proposed mosaicking process and reconstruction. By resorting to the multi-site assessment, the qualitative and quantitative exchange of information throughout the UAV hyperspectral community is facilitated. In addition, all the major benefits and drawbacks of each hyperspectral sensor regarding its operation and data features are identified. Lastly, the operational complexity in the context of precision agriculture is also presented.
高光谱航空影像由于技术的发展和相对可承受的价格标签而变得越来越普及。然而,在特定的背景下选择合适的无人机+高光谱传感器组合仍然具有挑战性,且缺乏适当的文档支持。选择无人机相对简单,因为它主要与传感器兼容性、自主性、可靠性和成本有关,而高光谱传感器则需要考虑更多因素。本说明对两种高光谱传感器(推扫式和快照式)在精准农业背景下的实用性和适用性进行了评估。目的是为研究人员、农学家、酿酒师和无人机飞行员提供可靠的数据采集协议和方法,使他们能够实现更快的处理技术,并有助于整合多个数据源。此外,还强调了在精准农业背景下使用每种技术的优缺点。通过定性和定量分析,介绍了每种成像类型数据集的高光谱传感器、无人机、飞行操作和处理方法。为此,选择了两个国家的四个葡萄园作为案例研究。这支持了在不同背景下使用两种高光谱传感器的相关优势和问题的推断。通过评估现场操作的复杂性、处理时间和结果的定性精度(即生成的高光谱镶嵌图的质量)来比较传感器的性能。结果表明,两种技术的总体几何质量都非常出色,在使用所提出的镶嵌处理和重建过程时,没有失真或重叠的错误。通过多站点评估,促进了无人机高光谱社区内的定性和定量信息交流。此外,还确定了每种高光谱传感器在操作和数据特性方面的主要优缺点。最后,还介绍了精准农业背景下的操作复杂性。