Detring Justus, Barreto Abel, Mahlein Anne-Katrin, Paulus Stefan
Institute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Niedersachsen, 37079, Germany.
Plant Methods. 2024 Dec 19;20(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13007-024-01315-y.
This research proposes an easy to apply quality assurance pipeline for hyperspectral imaging (HSI) systems used for plant phenotyping. Furthermore, a concept for the analysis of quality assured hyperspectral images to investigate plant disease progress is proposed. The quality assurance was applied to a handheld line scanning HSI-system consisting of evaluating spatial and spectral quality parameters as well as the integrated illumination. To test the spatial accuracy at different working distances, the sine-wave-based spatial frequency response (s-SFR) was analysed. The spectral accuracy was assessed by calculating the correlation of calibration-material measurements between the HSI-system and a non-imaging spectrometer. Additionally, different illumination systems were evaluated by analysing the spectral response of sugar beet canopies. As a use case, time series HSI measurements of sugar beet plants infested with Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) were performed to estimate the disease severity using convolutional neural network (CNN) supported data analysis.
The measurements of the calibration material were highly correlated with those of the non-imaging spectrometer (r>0.99). The resolution limit was narrowly missed at each of the tested working distances. Slight sharpness differences within individual images could be detected. The use of the integrated LED illumination for HSI can cause a distortion of the spectral response at 677nm and 752nm. The performance for CLS diseased pixel detection of the established CNN was sufficient to estimate a reliable disease severity progression from quality assured hyperspectral measurements with external illumination.
The quality assurance pipeline was successfully applied to evaluate a handheld HSI-system. The s-SFR analysis is a valuable method for assessing the spatial accuracy of HSI-systems. Comparing measurements between HSI-systems and a non-imaging spectrometer can provide reliable results on the spectral accuracy of the tested system. This research emphasizes the importance of evenly distributed diffuse illumination for HSI. Although the tested system showed shortcomings in image resolution, sharpness, and illumination, the high spectral accuracy of the tested HSI-system, supported by external illumination, enabled the establishment of a neural network-based concept to determine the severity and progression of CLS. The data driven quality assurance pipeline can be easily applied to any other HSI-system to ensure high quality HSI.
本研究提出了一种易于应用的质量保证流程,用于植物表型分析的高光谱成像(HSI)系统。此外,还提出了一种分析质量保证的高光谱图像以研究植物病害进展的概念。质量保证应用于一个手持式线扫描HSI系统,包括评估空间和光谱质量参数以及集成照明。为了测试不同工作距离下的空间精度,分析了基于正弦波的空间频率响应(s-SFR)。通过计算HSI系统与非成像光谱仪之间校准材料测量值的相关性来评估光谱精度。此外,通过分析甜菜冠层的光谱响应来评估不同的照明系统。作为一个应用案例,对感染尾孢叶斑病(CLS)的甜菜植株进行了高光谱时间序列测量,以使用卷积神经网络(CNN)支持的数据分析来估计病害严重程度。
校准材料的测量值与非成像光谱仪的测量值高度相关(r>0.99)。在每个测试工作距离下都勉强达到了分辨率极限。可以检测到单个图像内轻微的清晰度差异。HSI使用集成LED照明会在677nm和752nm处导致光谱响应失真。已建立的CNN对CLS患病像素检测的性能足以从外部照明的质量保证高光谱测量中估计可靠的病害严重程度进展。
质量保证流程成功应用于评估手持式HSI系统。s-SFR分析是评估HSI系统空间精度的一种有价值的方法。比较HSI系统与非成像光谱仪之间的测量可以为测试系统的光谱精度提供可靠结果。本研究强调了均匀分布的漫射照明对HSI的重要性。尽管测试系统在图像分辨率、清晰度和照明方面存在不足,但在外部照明支持下,测试的HSI系统的高光谱精度使得能够建立基于神经网络的概念来确定CLS的严重程度和进展。数据驱动的质量保证流程可以轻松应用于任何其他HSI系统,以确保高质量的HSI。