Hashem Ihab, Van Impe Jan F M
Department of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, Ghent, Belgium.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Aug 23;13:878223. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.878223. eCollection 2022.
Microbial conflicts have a particularly aggressive nature. In addition to other chemical, mechanical, and biological weapons in their repertoire, bacteria have evolved bacteriocins, which are narrow-spectrum toxins that kill closely related strains. Bacterial cells are known to frequently use their arsenal while competing against each other for nutrients and space. This stands in contrast with the animal world, where conflicts over resources and mating opportunities are far less lethal, and get commonly resolved ritualized fighting or "limited war" tactics. Prevalence of aggression in microbial communities is usually explained as due to their limited ability to resolve conflicts signaling as well as their limited ability to pull out from conflicts due to the sessile nature of their life within biofilms. We use an approach that combines Evolutionary Game Theory (EGT) and Individual-based Modeling (IbM) to investigate the origins of aggression in microbial conflicts. In order to understand how the spatial mode of growth affects the cost of a fight, we compare the growth dynamics emerging from engaging in aggression in a well-mixed system to a spatially structured system. To this end, a mathematical model is constructed for the competition between two bacterial strains where each strain produces a diffusible toxin to which the other strain is sensitive. It is observed that in the biofilm growth mode, starting from a mixed layer of two strains, mutual aggression gives rise to an exceedingly high level of spatial segregation, which in turn reduces the cost of aggression on both strains compared to when the same competition occurs in a well-mixed culture. Another observation is that the transition from a mixed layer to segregated growth is characterized by a switch in the overall growth dynamics. An increased "lag time" is observed in the overall population growth curve that is associated with the earlier stages of growth, when each strain is still experiencing the inhibiting effect of the toxin produced by its competitor. Afterwards, an exponential phase of growth kicks in once the competing strains start segregating from each other. The emerging "lag time" arises from the spiteful interactions between the two strains rather than acclimation of cells' internal physiology. Our analysis highlights the territorial nature of microbial conflicts as the key driver to their elevated levels of aggression as it increases the benefit-to-cost ratio of participating in antagonistic interactions.
微生物冲突具有特别激进的性质。除了其全部的其他化学、机械和生物武器外,细菌还进化出了细菌素,这是一种能杀死密切相关菌株的窄谱毒素。已知细菌细胞在相互争夺营养和空间时经常使用它们的武器库。这与动物世界形成了对比,在动物世界中,围绕资源和交配机会的冲突致死率要低得多,通常通过仪式化战斗或“有限战争”策略来解决。微生物群落中攻击行为的普遍存在通常被解释为由于它们通过信号解决冲突的能力有限,以及由于它们在生物膜内固着生活的性质而从冲突中撤出的能力有限。我们使用一种结合进化博弈论(EGT)和基于个体的建模(IbM)的方法来研究微生物冲突中攻击行为的起源。为了理解生长的空间模式如何影响战斗的成本,我们将在均匀混合系统中进行攻击所产生的生长动态与空间结构化系统进行比较。为此,构建了一个数学模型,用于两种细菌菌株之间的竞争,其中每种菌株都会产生另一种菌株敏感的可扩散毒素。可以观察到,在生物膜生长模式下,从两种菌株的混合层开始,相互攻击会导致极高程度的空间隔离,这反过来又降低了与在均匀混合培养中发生相同竞争时相比两种菌株的攻击成本。另一个观察结果是,从混合层到隔离生长的转变的特征是整体生长动态的转变。在与生长早期相关的总体种群生长曲线中观察到“滞后时间”增加,此时每种菌株仍在经历其竞争者产生的毒素的抑制作用。之后,一旦竞争菌株开始相互分离,指数生长阶段就会开始。出现的“滞后时间"源于两种菌株之间的恶意相互作用,而不是细胞内部生理的适应。我们的分析强调了微生物冲突的领土性质是其攻击水平升高的关键驱动因素,因为它增加了参与对抗性相互作用的收益成本比。