• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异质半荒漠草原牧场植物生态单元的分类:四种分类算法的性能评估

Classification of Plant Ecological Units in Heterogeneous Semi-Steppe Rangelands: Performance Assessment of Four Classification Algorithms.

作者信息

Aghababaei Masoumeh, Ebrahimi Ataollah, Naghipour Ali Asghar, Asadi Esmaeil, Verrelst Jochem

机构信息

Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, 8818634141 Shahrekord, Iran.

Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), Parc Científic, Universitat de València, 46980 Paterna, València, Spain.

出版信息

Remote Sens (Basel). 2021 Aug 29;13(17):3433. doi: 10.3390/rs13173433.

DOI:10.3390/rs13173433
PMID:36082038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7613391/
Abstract

Plant Ecological Unit's (PEUs) are the abstraction of vegetation communities that occur on a site which similarly respond to management actions and natural disturbances. Identification and monitoring of PEUs in a heterogeneous landscape is the most difficult task in medium resolution satellite images datasets. The main objective of this study is to compare pixel-based classification versus object-based classification for accurately classifying PEUs with four selected different algorithms across heterogeneous rangelands in Central Zagros, Iran. We used images of Landsat-8 OLI that were pan-sharpened to 15 m to classify four PEU classes based on a random dataset collected in the field (40%). In the first stage, we applied the following classification algorithms to distinguish PEUs: Minimum Distance (MD), Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC), Neural Network-Multi Layer Perceptron (NN-MLP) and Classification Tree Analysis (CTA) for pixel based method and object based method. Then, by using the most accurate classification approach, in the second stage auxiliary data (Principal Component Analysis (PCA)) was incorporated to improve the accuracy of the PEUs classification process. At the end, test data (60%) were used for accuracy assessment of the resulting maps. Object-based maps clearly outperformed pixel-based maps, especially with CTA, NN-MLP and MD algorithms with overall accuracies of 86%, 72% and 59%, respectively. The MLC algorithm did not reveal any significant difference between the object-based and pixel-based analyses. Finally, complementing PCA auxiliary bands to the CTA algorithms offered the most successful PEUs classification strategy, with the highest overall accuracy (89%). The results clearly underpin the importance of object-based classification with the CTA classifier together with PCA auxiliary data to optimize identification of PEU classes.

摘要

植物生态单元(PEUs)是对出现在某一地点的植被群落的抽象,这些植被群落对管理措施和自然干扰有相似的反应。在异质景观中识别和监测PEUs是中等分辨率卫星图像数据集中最困难的任务。本研究的主要目的是比较基于像素的分类和基于对象的分类,以便使用四种选定的不同算法在伊朗扎格罗斯中部的异质牧场中准确分类PEUs。我们使用了经过全色锐化至15米的Landsat-8 OLI图像,根据在实地收集的随机数据集(40%)对四个PEU类别进行分类。在第一阶段,我们应用以下分类算法来区分PEUs:基于像素的方法和基于对象的方法的最小距离(MD)、最大似然分类(MLC)、神经网络-多层感知器(NN-MLP)和分类树分析(CTA)。然后,通过使用最准确的分类方法,在第二阶段纳入辅助数据(主成分分析(PCA))以提高PEUs分类过程的准确性。最后,使用测试数据(60%)对生成的地图进行准确性评估。基于对象的地图明显优于基于像素的地图,特别是使用CTA、NN-MLP和MD算法时,总体准确率分别为86%、72%和59%。MLC算法在基于对象的分析和基于像素的分析之间没有显示出任何显著差异。最后,将PCA辅助波段补充到CTA算法中提供了最成功的PEUs分类策略,总体准确率最高(89%)。结果清楚地表明了使用CTA分类器进行基于对象的分类以及PCA辅助数据对于优化PEU类别的识别的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/807f97980a92/EMS152673-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/258718e47a12/EMS152673-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/fe8fc1d3ad5a/EMS152673-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/9a2c37f0f0b0/EMS152673-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/6c7b4c5b1dc3/EMS152673-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/7458eaa9a075/EMS152673-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/0ae3842448d2/EMS152673-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/807f97980a92/EMS152673-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/258718e47a12/EMS152673-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/fe8fc1d3ad5a/EMS152673-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/9a2c37f0f0b0/EMS152673-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/6c7b4c5b1dc3/EMS152673-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/7458eaa9a075/EMS152673-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/0ae3842448d2/EMS152673-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e6/7613391/807f97980a92/EMS152673-f007.jpg

相似文献

1
Classification of Plant Ecological Units in Heterogeneous Semi-Steppe Rangelands: Performance Assessment of Four Classification Algorithms.异质半荒漠草原牧场植物生态单元的分类:四种分类算法的性能评估
Remote Sens (Basel). 2021 Aug 29;13(17):3433. doi: 10.3390/rs13173433.
2
Extracting urban impervious surfaces from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 satellite data for urban planning and environmental management.从 Sentinel-2 和 Landsat-8 卫星数据中提取城市不透水面,用于城市规划和环境管理。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(6):6572-6586. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11007-4. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
3
Introducing ARTMO's Machine-Learning Classification Algorithms Toolbox: Application to Plant-Type Detection in a Semi-Steppe Iranian Landscape.介绍ARTMO的机器学习分类算法工具箱:应用于伊朗半草原景观中的植物类型检测
Remote Sens (Basel). 2022 Sep 6;14(18):4452. doi: 10.3390/rs14184452.
4
Land-cover classification in a moist tropical region of Brazil with Landsat TM imagery.利用陆地卫星专题制图仪影像对巴西一个湿润热带地区进行土地覆盖分类。
Int J Remote Sens. 2011;32(23):8207-8230. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2010.532831.
5
Mapping the distribution of the main host for plague in a complex landscape in Kazakhstan: An object-based approach using SPOT-5 XS, Landsat 7 ETM+, SRTM and multiple Random Forests.绘制哈萨克斯坦复杂地貌中鼠疫主要宿主的分布:一种使用SPOT-5 XS、Landsat 7 ETM+、SRTM和多个随机森林的基于对象的方法。
Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2013 Aug;23(100):81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2012.11.007.
6
Comparing Pixel- and Object-Based Approaches in Effectively Classifying Wetland-Dominated Landscapes.比较基于像素和基于对象的方法在有效分类以湿地为主的景观中的应用
Remote Sens (Basel). 2018;10(1):46. doi: 10.3390/rs10010046.
7
Detecting the development stages of natural forests in northern Iran with different algorithms and high-resolution data from GeoEye-1.利用 GeoEye-1 提供的不同算法和高分辨率数据,检测伊朗北部的天然林发育阶段。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Sep 23;192(10):653. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08612-8.
8
Remote sensing tree classification with a multilayer perceptron.基于多层感知器的遥感树木分类
PeerJ. 2019 Feb 28;7:e6101. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6101. eCollection 2019.
9
Improved random forest classification model combined with C5.0 algorithm for vegetation feature analysis in non-agricultural environments.结合C5.0算法的改进随机森林分类模型用于非农业环境中的植被特征分析
Sci Rep. 2024 May 6;14(1):10367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60066-x.
10
Optimizing neural networks for medical data sets: A case study on neonatal apnea prediction.优化神经网络在医学数据集上的应用:以新生儿呼吸暂停预测为例的研究
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:59-76. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Introducing ARTMO's Machine-Learning Classification Algorithms Toolbox: Application to Plant-Type Detection in a Semi-Steppe Iranian Landscape.介绍ARTMO的机器学习分类算法工具箱:应用于伊朗半草原景观中的植物类型检测
Remote Sens (Basel). 2022 Sep 6;14(18):4452. doi: 10.3390/rs14184452.
2
Vegetation Types Mapping Using Multi-Temporal Landsat Images in the Google Earth Engine Platform.在谷歌地球引擎平台上使用多期陆地卫星影像进行植被类型制图
Remote Sens (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;13(22):4683. doi: 10.3390/rs13224683.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of ecological redundancy on the performance of machine learning classifiers in vegetation mapping.生态冗余对机器学习分类器在植被制图中性能的影响。
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jun 11;8(13):6728-6737. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4176. eCollection 2018 Jul.
2
Applying ecological site concepts and state-and-transition models to a grazed riparian rangeland.将生态位概念以及状态和转变模型应用于放牧河岸牧场。
Ecol Evol. 2018 Apr 19;8(10):4907-4918. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4057. eCollection 2018 May.