• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运输价格、产品差异化和寡头垄断中的研发。

Transportation price, product differentiation, and R&D in an oligopoly.

机构信息

Faculty of Economics, Toyo University, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Economics, Seinan Gakuin University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0273904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273904. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0273904
PMID:36083876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9462559/
Abstract

In this article, we construct an international oligopoly that explicitly incorporates transporter behavior. In each country, there is one firm that produces differentiated goods and invests in product-differentiating R&D and one transporter that transports the differentiated goods. We adopt a three-stage game in which the firms decide their R&D investment level to determine the degree of horizontal differentiation, the transporters determine the transportation prices through Cournot competition, and then the firms determine the quantities of production. We find that an increase in R&D efficiency in the product differentiation of firms leads to a decrease in transportation prices. We also reveal that an increase in the efficiency of product differentiation always reduces the profits of firms. These results explain the empirically plausible long-term trend of declining transportation prices and also provide a counterintuitive implication that efficiency gains reduce the degree of product differentiation.

摘要

在本文中,我们构建了一个明确纳入转运商行为的国际寡头垄断模型。在每个国家中,都有一家生产差异化产品并投资于产品差异化研发的企业,以及一家运输差异化产品的转运商。我们采用了三阶段博弈,其中企业决定其研发投资水平以确定水平差异化程度,转运商通过古诺竞争确定运输价格,然后企业确定产量。我们发现,企业产品差异化研发效率的提高会导致运输价格的下降。我们还揭示了产品差异化效率的提高总是会降低企业的利润。这些结果解释了运输价格长期下降的经验上合理的趋势,也提供了一个反直觉的含义,即效率提高会降低产品差异化程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/ce3a8e2f9e43/pone.0273904.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/4274c64d0157/pone.0273904.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/13bf8bf45b82/pone.0273904.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/ff19b89a7416/pone.0273904.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/6a892166fda0/pone.0273904.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/f665865ff26f/pone.0273904.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/fa988608d67f/pone.0273904.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/474d2676ac44/pone.0273904.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/6549c87b4f7c/pone.0273904.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/ce3a8e2f9e43/pone.0273904.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/4274c64d0157/pone.0273904.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/13bf8bf45b82/pone.0273904.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/ff19b89a7416/pone.0273904.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/6a892166fda0/pone.0273904.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/f665865ff26f/pone.0273904.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/fa988608d67f/pone.0273904.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/474d2676ac44/pone.0273904.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/6549c87b4f7c/pone.0273904.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b15/9462559/ce3a8e2f9e43/pone.0273904.g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Transportation price, product differentiation, and R&D in an oligopoly.运输价格、产品差异化和寡头垄断中的研发。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0273904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273904. eCollection 2022.
2
Intra-brand competition in a differentiated oligopoly.差异化寡头垄断中的品牌内竞争。
J Econ (Vienna). 2021;132(1):1-40. doi: 10.1007/s00712-020-00712-w. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
3
Impact of product subsidies on R&D investment for new energy vehicle firms: Considering quality preference of the early adopter group.产品补贴对新能源汽车企业研发投资的影响:考虑早期采用者群体的质量偏好。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 31;15(7):e0236626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236626. eCollection 2020.
4
Differentiated Entry or "Me-Too" Entry in Bertrand and Cournot Oligopoly.伯特兰和古诺寡头垄断中的差异化进入或“模仿式”进入。
Rev Ind Organ. 2022;60(1):1-27. doi: 10.1007/s11151-021-09822-1. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
5
Competition and private R&D investment.竞争与私人研发投资。
PLoS One. 2020 May 27;15(5):e0232119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232119. eCollection 2020.
6
Endogenous R&D spillover and location choice in a mixed oligopoly.混合寡头垄断中的内生研发溢出与区位选择
Ann Reg Sci. 2013;51(2):459-477. doi: 10.1007/s00168-013-0556-2. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
7
Will the Volume-Based Procurement Policy Promote Pharmaceutical Firms' R&D Investment in China? An Event Study Approach.基于量的采购政策会促进中国制药企业的研发投资吗?一项事件研究方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 16;18(22):12037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212037.
8
Healthy vs. unhealthy food: a strategic choice for firms and consumers.健康食品与不健康食品:企业和消费者的战略选择。
Health Econ Rev. 2011 Jul 20;1(1):4. doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-1-4.
9
Stability of equilibrium production-price in a dynamic duopoly Cournot-Bertrand game with asymmetric information and cluster spillovers.具有不对称信息和集群溢出效应的动态双寡头古诺-伯特兰博弈中均衡生产价格的稳定性
Math Biosci Eng. 2022 Sep 22;19(12):14056-14073. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022654.
10
One lab, two firms, many possibilities: On R&D outsourcing in the biopharmaceutical industry.一个实验室,两家公司,多种可能性:生物制药行业的研发外包。
J Health Econ. 2019 May;65:260-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Feb 13.