Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Syst Reform. 2022 Jan 1;8(1):2117320. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2022.2117320.
In 2013, the Government of The Gambia implemented a novel results-based financing (RBF) intervention designed to improve maternal and child nutrition and health through a combination of community, facility and individual incentives. In a mixed-methods study, we used a randomized 2 × 2 study design to measure these interventions' impact on the uptake of priority maternal health services, hygiene and sanitation. Conditional cash transfers to individuals were bundled with facility results-based payments. Community groups received incentive payments conditional on completion of locally-designed health projects. Randomization occurred separately at health facility and community levels. Our model pools baseline, midline and endline exposure data to identify evidence of the interventions' impact in isolation or combination. Multivariable linear regression models were estimated. A qualitative study was embedded, with data thematically analyzed. We analyzed 5,927 household surveys: 1,939 baseline, 1,951 midline, and 2,037 endline. On average, community group interventions increased skilled deliveries by 11 percentage points, while the facility interventions package increased them by seven percentage points. No impact was found, either in the community group or facility intervention package arms on early ANC. The community group intervention led to 49, 43 and 48 percentage point increases in handwashing stations, soaps at station and water at station, respectively. No impact was found on improved sanitation facilities. The qualitative data help understand factors underlying these changes. No interaction was found between the community and facility interventions. Where demand-side barriers predominate and community governance structures exist, community group RBF interventions may be more effective than facility designs.
2013 年,冈比亚政府实施了一项新颖的基于成果的融资(RBF)干预措施,旨在通过社区、医疗机构和个人激励相结合的方式改善母婴营养和健康。在一项混合方法研究中,我们使用随机 2×2 研究设计来衡量这些干预措施对优先产妇保健服务、卫生和环境卫生的影响。向个人提供有条件的现金转移与医疗机构基于成果的支付捆绑在一起。社区团体在完成当地设计的卫生项目的条件下获得奖励性支付。随机化分别在医疗机构和社区层面进行。我们的模型汇集了基线、中期和终期暴露数据,以确定干预措施单独或联合的影响证据。使用多变量线性回归模型进行估计。一项定性研究被嵌入其中,数据进行了主题分析。我们分析了 5927 户家庭调查:1939 户基线、1951 户中期和 2037 户终期。平均而言,社区团体干预措施使熟练分娩率增加了 11 个百分点,而医疗机构干预措施包则使熟练分娩率增加了 7 个百分点。无论是在社区团体干预措施还是医疗机构干预措施包中,都没有发现早期 ANC 的影响。社区团体干预措施使洗手站、肥皂和水的比例分别增加了 49%、43%和 48%。对改善卫生设施没有影响。定性数据有助于理解这些变化的背后因素。没有发现社区和医疗机构干预措施之间存在相互作用。在需求方障碍占主导地位且社区治理结构存在的情况下,社区团体 RBF 干预措施可能比医疗机构设计更有效。