• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生在与患者讨论前列腺癌临床试验时使用通俗易懂的语言。

Physicians' use of plain language during discussions of prostate cancer clinical trials with patients.

机构信息

Department of English, Floria International University, Miami, FL, USA.

Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Dec;105(12):3453-3458. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.002. Epub 2022 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.002
PMID:36085183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9675686/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study described physicians' use of plain language during patient-physician cancer clinical trial discussions.

METHODS

Video-recorded clinical interactions and accompanying transcripts were taken from a larger study of communication and clinical trials (PACCT). Interactions (n = 25) were selected if they included invitations to participate in a clinical trial. We used descriptive, qualitative discourse analysis, a method that identifies language patterns at or above the sentence level. We first excerpted discussions of clinical trials, then identified instances of plain language within those discussions. Finally, we inductively coded those instances to describe physicians' plain language practices.

RESULTS

The analysis identified four plain language practices. Lexical simplification replaced medical terminology with simpler words. Patient-centered definition named, categorized, and explained complex medical terminology. Metaphor explained medical terminology by comparing it with known concepts. Finally, experience-focused description replaced medical terminology with descriptions of patients' potential physical experiences.

CONCLUSION

These plain language practices hold promise as part of effective information exchange in discussions of cancer clinical trials. Testing is needed to identify patient preferences and the extent to which these practices address patient health literacy needs.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Pending further testing, these plain language practices may be integrated into physician clinical trial and other communication training.

摘要

目的

本研究描述了医生在医患癌症临床试验讨论中使用平实语言的情况。

方法

从一项更大的关于沟通和临床试验的研究(PACCT)中选取了视频记录的临床互动和相应的文字记录。如果互动(n=25)包括邀请参与临床试验,则选择这些互动。我们使用描述性的定性话语分析方法,该方法可以识别句子以上级别的语言模式。我们首先摘录了临床试验的讨论内容,然后在这些讨论中识别平实语言的实例。最后,我们对这些实例进行归纳编码,以描述医生的平实语言实践。

结果

分析确定了四种平实语言实践。词汇简化用简单的词语替代医学术语。以患者为中心的定义命名、分类并解释复杂的医学术语。隐喻通过将医学术语与已知概念进行比较来解释医学术语。最后,以经验为中心的描述用患者潜在的身体体验来替代医学术语。

结论

这些平实语言实践有望成为癌症临床试验讨论中有效信息交流的一部分。需要进行测试以确定患者的偏好以及这些实践在多大程度上满足患者的健康素养需求。

实践意义

在进一步测试之前,这些平实语言实践可以整合到医生的临床试验和其他沟通培训中。

相似文献

1
Physicians' use of plain language during discussions of prostate cancer clinical trials with patients.医生在与患者讨论前列腺癌临床试验时使用通俗易懂的语言。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Dec;105(12):3453-3458. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.002. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
2
Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language.循证患者选择:一份通俗易懂的前列腺癌决策辅助工具
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 Jun 20;5:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-16.
3
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
4
Correlates of Physicians' and Patients' Language Use during Surgical Consultations.外科手术咨询中医生和患者语言使用的相关因素。
Health Commun. 2020 Sep;35(10):1248-1255. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1625001. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
5
6
Clinician-Spoken Plain Language in Health Care Encounters: A Qualitative Analysis to Assess Measurable Elements.临床医生在医疗保健中的口语平实语言:评估可衡量元素的定性分析。
Acad Med. 2024 Jun 1;99(6):663-672. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005666. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
7
Pairing physician education with patient activation to improve shared decisions in prostate cancer screening: a cluster randomized controlled trial.将医生教育与患者激活相结合,以改善前列腺癌筛查中的共同决策:一项群组随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):324-34. doi: 10.1370/afm.1550.
8
Addressing multilevel barriers to clinical trial participation among Black and White men with prostate cancer through the PACCT study.通过 PACCT 研究解决黑人和白人前列腺癌男性参与临床试验的多层次障碍。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(7):8604-8613. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5552. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
9
Physician-patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests.医患之间关于有争议的癌症筛查检测的讨论。
Am J Prev Med. 2001 Feb;20(2):130-4. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00288-9.
10
Experts practice what they preach: A descriptive study of best and normative practices in end-of-life discussions.专家言行一致:临终讨论中最佳实践与规范实践的描述性研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(22):3477-85. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.22.3477.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of Doctor-Patient Communication in Terms of Patient Rights During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间患者权利视角下医患沟通的决定因素
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 4;12(21):2198. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212198.
2
Preferences of people with chronic kidney disease regarding digital health interventions that promote healthy lifestyle: qualitative systematic review with meta-ethnography.慢性肾脏病患者对促进健康生活方式的数字健康干预措施的偏好:定性系统评价与荟萃民族学。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 27;14(5):e082345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082345.
3
"Your cancer is no longer considered cancer": Psychological reactions to reclassification information and communication preferences.“您的癌症不再被视为癌症”:对重新分类信息的心理反应及沟通偏好
PEC Innov. 2023 May 10;2:100165. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100165. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Preparing Patients to Communicate with Their Doctors About Clinical Trials as a Treatment Option: Impact of a Novel Video Intervention for Patients with a Blood Cancer and Their Caregivers.为患者准备与医生就临床试验作为治疗选择进行沟通:一种新型视频干预对血液癌症患者及其护理人员的影响。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Oct;38(5):1562-1570. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02300-0. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Cancer Clinical Trials: An American Society of Clinical Oncology and Association of Community Cancer Centers Joint Research Statement.提高癌症临床试验中的种族和民族多样性:美国临床肿瘤学会和社区癌症中心协会联合研究声明。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;40(19):2163-2171. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00754. Epub 2022 May 19.
2
Willingness to Discuss Clinical Trials Among Black vs White Men With Prostate Cancer.黑人和白人前列腺癌男性参与临床试验意愿的比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Nov 1;6(11):1773-1777. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3697.
3
Improving knowledge and decision readiness to participate in cancer clinical trials: Effects of a plain language decision aid for minority cancer survivors.提高参与癌症临床试验的知识和决策准备:少数民族癌症幸存者简明决策辅助工具的效果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Feb;104(2):422-426. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
4
Health literacy in rural and urban populations: A systematic review.农村和城市人口的健康素养:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):2142-2154. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
5
Unpacking Trial Offers and Low Accrual Rates: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinic Visits With Physicians and Patients Potentially Eligible for a Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial.解析试验方案和低入组率:一项对潜在符合前列腺癌临床试验条件的医生和患者就诊的定性分析。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Feb;16(2):e124-e131. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00444. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
6
Cultural competence and metaphor in mental healthcare interactions: A linguistic perspective.文化能力与心理保健互动中的隐喻:语言视角。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Dec;102(12):2192-2198. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
7
The Association Between Health Literacy and Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Behaviors: Findings From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.健康素养与乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查行为之间的关联:来自行为风险因素监测系统的研究结果。
Nurs Res. 2019 May/Jun;68(3):177-188. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000346.
8
A concept analysis of health literacy.健康素养的概念分析
Nurs Forum. 2019 Jul;54(3):315-327. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12331. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
9
Development of a Plain Language Decision Support Tool for Cancer Clinical Trials: Blending Health Literacy, Academic Research, and Minority Patient Perspectives.开发用于癌症临床试验的简明决策支持工具:融合健康素养、学术研究和少数族裔患者观点。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):454-461. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-1482-5.
10
Assessing the Plain Language Planner for Communication About Common Palliative Care Medications.评估用于常见姑息治疗药物沟通的简明语言规划器。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2017 Sep-Oct;8(6):575-580. Epub 2017 Sep 1.