• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化学习在脓毒症 ICU 患者最佳液体和血管加压素干预中的应用。

A Reinforcement Learning Application for Optimal Fluid and Vasopressor Interventions in Septic ICU Patients.

出版信息

Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2022 Jul;2022:321-324. doi: 10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871055.

DOI:10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871055
PMID:36086153
Abstract

Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death in ICU and its timely recognition and management are of primary importance. Resuscitation from hypotension in patients with sepsis is one of the first challenges that require fluid and/or vasopressor administrations. Unfortunately, clinical guidelines provide only indications of the strategy that should be adopted in this critical population but personalized strategies are still missing. In this study, we propose a comparative analysis of reinforcement learning applications on ICU data collected in the electronic health records and publicly available within the MIMIC-III database. The ultimate goal of the study is to estimate the optimal fluid and vasopressor administrations. Results show that, after the use of principal component analysis for reducing feature space dimensionality, model performances increased, thus suggesting that additional preprocessing strategies might be used for both reducing the computational cost and refining model performances. Clinical relevance In a context where clinical guidelines are not able to provide the best treatment strategies at a patient level, reinforcement learning applications trained on retrospectively collected data may be used for developing models able to suggest to clinicians the optimal dosage of fluids and/or vasopressors in order to improve 90-day patients' survival.

摘要

脓毒症是 ICU 患者死亡的主要原因之一,及时识别和管理至关重要。脓毒症患者低血压的复苏是首先需要进行液体和/或血管加压素治疗的挑战之一。不幸的是,临床指南仅提供了在这一危急人群中应采用的策略的指示,但仍缺乏个性化策略。在这项研究中,我们提出了在电子健康记录中收集的 ICU 数据和 MIMIC-III 数据库中公开提供的数据上应用强化学习的比较分析。该研究的最终目标是估计最佳的液体和血管加压素的管理。结果表明,在使用主成分分析降低特征空间维度后,模型性能得到了提高,这表明可能会使用其他预处理策略来降低计算成本和提高模型性能。临床相关性在临床指南无法在患者层面提供最佳治疗策略的情况下,基于回顾性收集的数据进行强化学习应用可以用于开发能够向临床医生建议最佳液体和/或血管加压素剂量的模型,以提高 90 天患者的生存率。

相似文献

1
A Reinforcement Learning Application for Optimal Fluid and Vasopressor Interventions in Septic ICU Patients.强化学习在脓毒症 ICU 患者最佳液体和血管加压素干预中的应用。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2022 Jul;2022:321-324. doi: 10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871055.
2
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克治疗国际指南:2008年版
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.
3
Recent Updates in the Pharmacological Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review Focused on Fluid Resuscitation, Vasopressors, and Corticosteroids.近期脓毒症和感染性休克的药理学治疗进展:一项侧重于液体复苏、血管升压药和皮质类固醇的系统评价。
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Apr;53(4):385-395. doi: 10.1177/1060028018812940. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
4
From a pressure-guided to a perfusion-centered resuscitation strategy in septic shock: Critical literature review and illustrative case.从压力指导到灌注为中心的复苏策略在感染性休克中的应用:关键文献回顾和案例说明。
J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:294-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.11.008. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
5
Should Vasopressors Be Started Early in Septic Shock?是否应该在感染性休克早期开始使用血管加压药?
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct;42(5):683-688. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733897. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
6
Evolving Management Practices for Early Sepsis-induced Hypoperfusion: A Narrative Review.早期脓毒症相关性低灌注的管理实践演变:叙述性综述。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 May 15;207(10):1283-1299. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202209-1831CI.
7
The initial resuscitation of septic shock.感染性休克的初步复苏。
J Crit Care. 2020 Jun;57:108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
8
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准:用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
9
Fluid Response Evaluation in Sepsis Hypotension and Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial.脓毒症低血压和休克患者液体反应评估:一项随机临床试验。
Chest. 2020 Oct;158(4):1431-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.025. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
10
The Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors In Emergency Department Sepsis, a multicentre observational study (ARISE FLUIDS observational study): Rationale, methods and analysis plan.澳大利亚脓毒症复苏评估:急诊科脓毒症中使用液体还是血管加压药,一项多中心观察性研究(ARISE 液体观察性研究):原理、方法和分析计划。
Emerg Med Australas. 2019 Feb;31(1):90-96. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13223. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
A Reinforcement Learning Model for Optimal Treatment Strategies in Intensive Care: Assessment of the Role of Cardiorespiratory Features.一种用于重症监护中优化治疗策略的强化学习模型:心肺特征作用的评估
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024 Feb 19;5:806-815. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3367236. eCollection 2024.
2
Artificial intelligence and machine learning's role in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.人工智能和机器学习在脓毒症相关急性肾损伤中的作用。
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2024 Jul;43(4):417-432. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.23.298. Epub 2024 Jun 20.