Faculté de philosophie, Université Laval, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST), Centre nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS).
Ber Wiss. 2022 Sep;45(3):397-414. doi: 10.1002/bewi.202200017.
In this article, I first outline the professionalization of the history and philosophy of biology from the 1960s onward. Then, I attempt to situate the work of Hans-Jörg Rheinberger with respect to this field. On the one hand, Rheinberger was marginal with respect to Anglo-American philosophical tradition; on the other, he was very influential in building up an integrated history and philosophy of the life sciences community at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin and beyond. This marginality results, I suggest, from three main sources: his use of concepts coming from continental traditions in the study of the life sciences, which are foreign to Anglo-American philosophers of science; his focus on practices instead of theories; and his research trajectory as a molecular biologist, which led him to be critical of disciplinary boundaries. As a first step in situating and historicizing Rheinberger's trajectory, this article invites comparative studies and calls for a history of "continental philosophy of biology" in the twentieth century.
本文首先概述了 20 世纪 60 年代以来生物学史和哲学的专业化发展。然后,我试图将汉斯-约尔格·莱茵贝格尔的工作置于这一领域之中。一方面,莱茵贝格尔游离于英美哲学传统之外;另一方面,他在柏林马克斯·普朗克科学史研究所及其他地方,对生命科学领域的历史和哲学的综合研究产生了深远影响。我认为,这种边缘化源自三个主要来源:他在生命科学研究中使用了来自欧陆传统的概念,这些概念对英美科学哲学家来说是陌生的;他关注实践而非理论;他作为分子生物学家的研究轨迹使他对学科界限持批判态度。作为将莱茵贝格尔的轨迹置于特定情境并使其历史化的第一步,本文邀请开展比较研究,并呼吁在 20 世纪构建“欧陆生物学哲学”的历史。