Faculty of Health, European School of Physiotherapy, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Faculty of Health, European School of Physiotherapy, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Faculty of Health, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Oct;60:102198. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102198. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
This study investigates patients' experiences of interaction with their healthcare professionals (HCPs) during cancer treatment and identifies elements that HCPs can utilize to improve cancer care provision.
PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and Embase were systematically searched for relevant studies published from January 2010 until February 2022. Qualitative studies investigating adult patients' perspectives on their interaction with HCPs during cancer treatment were included. Studies conducted during the diagnosis or end-of-life treatment phase were excluded. Duplicate removal, screening, and quality appraisal were independently performed by four reviewers using Covidence.org. We performed a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative data extracted from studies meeting the quality criteria in three stages: excerpts coding, codes categorization, and theme identification by merging similar categories.
Eighty-eight studies were included for quality appraisal, of which 50 papers met the quality inclusion criteria. Three themes were identified as essential to positively perceived patient-HCP interaction: "Support, respect and agency", "Quantity, timing, and clarity of information", and "Confidence, honesty, and expertise". Overall, patients experienced positive interaction with HCPs when the approach was person-centered and when HCPs possessed strong interpersonal skills. However, patients expressed negative experiences when their preferences regarding communication and the type of personal support needed were ignored.
This meta-synthesis emphasizes the importance for HCPs to recognize all patients' needs, including communication and personal support preferences, to provide high-quality care. Consequently, healthcare professionals should continuously train their verbal and non-verbal communication, empathy, active listening, and collaboration skills during their undergraduate and continuing education.
本研究调查了患者在癌症治疗过程中与医疗保健专业人员(HCP)互动的体验,并确定 HCP 可以利用哪些元素来改善癌症护理服务。
系统检索了 PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO、SCOPUS 和 Embase 中 2010 年 1 月至 2022 年 2 月期间发表的相关研究。纳入了调查成年患者在癌症治疗期间与 HCP 互动的观点的定性研究。排除了在诊断或生命末期治疗阶段进行的研究。使用 Covidence.org 由四名评审员独立进行重复去除、筛选和质量评估。我们对符合质量标准的研究中提取的定性数据进行了主题元综合分析,分为三个阶段:摘录编码、编码分类以及通过合并相似类别确定主题。
对 88 项研究进行了质量评估,其中 50 篇论文符合质量纳入标准。确定了三个对积极感知的患者-HCP 互动至关重要的主题:“支持、尊重和代理”、“信息的数量、时间和清晰度”和“信心、诚实和专业知识”。总体而言,当方法以患者为中心且 HCP 具备强大的人际交往技巧时,患者对 HCP 的互动体验是积极的。然而,当患者的沟通偏好和所需的个人支持类型被忽视时,他们表达了负面的体验。
这项元综合强调了 HCP 认识所有患者需求的重要性,包括沟通和个人支持偏好,以提供高质量的护理。因此,医疗保健专业人员应在本科和继续教育阶段不断培训他们的口头和非口头沟通、同理心、积极倾听和协作技能。