Suppr超能文献

电子烟与心肌梗死:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

E-cigarettes and myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sharma Akash, Gupta Ishita, Venkatesh U, Singh Arvind Kumar, Golamari Reshma, Arya Prakriti

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo - Catholic Health System, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2023 Jan 15;371:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With widespread awareness about the harmful effects of traditional smoking, many people are considering using an e-cigarette. However, many studies have shown that e-cigarettes are not entirely harmless, and their use has been implicated in causing major adverse cardiovascular events.

METHODS

We adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to conduct this systematic review. An electronic search was conducted comprehensively through five databases to find the relevant articles. The odds ratio (OR) was used for comparing groups. Meta-analysis was conducted using R statistical software version 3.4.3. A random-effects model was used.

RESULTS

A total of 4 studies were included in the analysis incorporating data on 585,306 individuals. Of these, 19,435 were e-cigarettes users, while 1693 used only traditional cigarettes, and 553,095 were non-e-cigarette users. 7.0% of e-cigarettes users suffered an MI (myocardial infarction), while 7.7% and 6.5% of traditional smokers and non-e-cigarettes users suffered an MI. The OR of getting an MI in e-cigarettes (e-cigarettes only or e-cigarettes + traditional smoking) users was 1.33 (95% CI = 1.14-1.56, p-value = 0.01) in comparison to non e-cigarette users (traditional smoking or no smoking). While it is 0.61 (95% CI = 0.40-0.93, p-value 0.02) when compared with traditional smoking.

CONCLUSION

Those using e-cigarettes have higher odds of suffering from an MI in comparison to not using e-cigarettes. However, using e-cigarettes is associated with half risk of the risk of MI in comparison to traditional smoking.

摘要

背景

随着人们对传统吸烟有害影响的广泛认识,许多人正在考虑使用电子烟。然而,许多研究表明,电子烟并非完全无害,其使用与导致重大心血管不良事件有关。

方法

我们采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行这项系统评价。通过五个数据库全面进行电子检索以查找相关文章。使用比值比(OR)比较各组。使用R统计软件3.4.3版进行Meta分析。采用随机效应模型。

结果

分析共纳入4项研究,涉及585,306人。其中,19,435人为电子烟使用者,1693人仅使用传统香烟,553,095人为非电子烟使用者。7.0%的电子烟使用者发生心肌梗死(MI),而传统吸烟者和非电子烟使用者的这一比例分别为7.7%和6.5%。与非电子烟使用者(传统吸烟或不吸烟)相比,电子烟使用者(仅使用电子烟或电子烟+传统吸烟)发生MI的OR为1.33(95%CI=1.14-1.56,p值=0.01)。与传统吸烟相比,该OR为0.61(95%CI=0.40-0.93,p值=0.02)。

结论

与不使用电子烟相比,使用电子烟的人发生MI的几率更高。然而,与传统吸烟相比,使用电子烟发生MI的风险降低一半。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验