Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm/Guenzburg, Germany.
School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 10;22(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04206-5.
Peer support is increasingly acknowledged as an integral part of mental health services around the world. However, most research on peer support comes from high-income countries, with little attention to similarities and differences between different settings and how these affect implementation. Mental health workers have an important role to play in integrating formal peer support into statutory services, and their attitudes toward peer support can represent either a barrier to or facilitator of successful implementation. Thus, this study investigates mental health workers' attitudes toward peer support across a range of high- (Germany, Israel), middle- (India), and low-income country (Tanzania, Uganda) settings.
Six focus groups were conducted in Ulm and Hamburg (Germany), Butabika (Uganda), Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), Be'er Sheva (Israel), and Ahmedabad, Gujarat (India) with a total of 35 participants. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis.
Participants across the study sites demonstrated overall positive attitudes towards peer support in mental health care, although some concerns were raised on potentially harmful effects of peer support such as negative role modelling and giving inadequate advice to service users. Notably, mental health workers from low- and middle-income countries described peer support workers as bridge-builders and emphasized the mutual benefits of peer support. Mental health workers' views on peer support workers' roles and role boundaries differed between sites. In some settings, mental health workers strongly agreed on the need for role clarity, whereas in others, mental health workers expressed mixed views, with some preferring blurred role boundaries. Regarding collaboration, mental health workers described peer support workers as supporters and utilizers, equal partners or emphasized a need for trust and commitment.
Mental health workers' attitudes toward peer support workers were positive overall, but they also varied depending on local context, resources and previous experiences with peer support. This affected their conceptions of peer support workers' roles, role clarity, and collaboration. This study demonstrated that reconciling the need for local adaptations and safeguarding the core values of peer support is necessary and possible, especially when the implementation of recovery-oriented interventions such as peer support is accelerating worldwide.
同伴支持在世界范围内已被越来越多地视为精神卫生服务的一个组成部分。然而,大多数关于同伴支持的研究来自高收入国家,很少关注不同环境之间的相似性和差异性,以及这些因素如何影响实施。精神卫生工作者在将正式的同伴支持融入法定服务中发挥着重要作用,他们对同伴支持的态度可能成为成功实施的障碍或促进因素。因此,本研究调查了精神卫生工作者在一系列高收入(德国、以色列)、中等收入(印度)和低收入国家(坦桑尼亚、乌干达)环境中对同伴支持的态度。
在德国的乌尔姆和汉堡、乌干达的布塔比卡、坦桑尼亚的达累斯萨拉姆、以色列的贝尔谢巴和印度古吉拉特邦的艾哈迈达巴德进行了六次焦点小组讨论,共有 35 名参与者。使用主题内容分析对转录本进行了分析。
研究地点的参与者总体上对精神卫生保健中的同伴支持持积极态度,尽管有人对同伴支持可能产生的有害影响表示担忧,例如负面榜样作用和向服务使用者提供不适当的建议。值得注意的是,来自低收入和中等收入国家的精神卫生工作者将同伴支持工作者描述为桥梁建设者,并强调了同伴支持的互惠互利。精神卫生工作者对同伴支持工作者角色和角色边界的看法因地点而异。在一些环境中,精神卫生工作者强烈认为需要明确角色,而在其他环境中,精神卫生工作者则表达了不同的观点,有些更倾向于模糊的角色边界。关于合作,精神卫生工作者将同伴支持工作者描述为支持者和利用者、平等伙伴或强调需要信任和承诺。
精神卫生工作者对同伴支持工作者的态度总体上是积极的,但也因当地背景、资源和以前对同伴支持的经验而有所不同。这影响了他们对同伴支持工作者角色、角色清晰度和合作的看法。本研究表明,协调当地适应的需要和保障同伴支持的核心价值是必要且可行的,尤其是当在全球范围内加速实施以康复为导向的干预措施(如同伴支持)时。