Suppr超能文献

临终关怀中的医疗决策:来自两项定性研究的结果。

Medical decision-making in hospices from the viewpoint of physicians: results from two qualitative studies.

机构信息

ADG Scientific - Center for Research and Cooperation e.V., Albertstraße 3, 56410, Montabaur, Germany.

Lehrstuhl Für Moraltheologie, Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Sep 10;21(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00999-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physicians who practice in a hospice are responsible for working with patients and nursing staff to develop a medication plan, monitor symptoms and pain, and adjust medication if necessary. In inpatient hospices in Germany, physicians are part of a multi-professional approach, but not part of the hospice team itself. However, there is no, or hardly any, literature on medical practice in a hospice setting. Therefore, we wanted to know how physicians reflect upon their role in hospice within a multi-professional setting, how they communicate with patients, relatives, nursing staff and other physicians, and what the limitations of these communication processes are.

METHODS

By means of two qualitative studies we explored how physicians classify their activities as part of the hospice organization. The study design followed Grounded Theory procedures.

RESULTS

The physicians named an appropriate interpretation of the patient's wishes as the challenge of everyday practice which can lead to differences of perspective with those involved: with nursing staff, who would prefer an alternative form of medication, with relatives, who do not accept that the patient refuses nutrition, with other physicians, who have a different opinion about appropriate treatment. For physicians, this is all the more challenging as communication with the patient becomes increasingly uncertain due to the patient's illness. Again and again, medical measures have to be negotiated on several levels.

CONCLUSION

Multi-professional organizations that have to deal with differences in perspective handle them by clearly distinguishing areas of responsibility, an aspect that physicians also claim for themselves. For physicians the question arises repeatedly whether they have correctly interpreted the wishes of the patient. They must continuously reassure themselves of the patient's wishes and this presents them with communication challenges not only with the patient, but also with the nursing staff and relatives and, more recently, with their colleagues.

摘要

背景

在临终关怀机构执业的医生负责与患者和护理人员合作制定药物治疗计划,监测症状和疼痛,并在必要时调整药物。在德国的住院临终关怀机构中,医生是多专业方法的一部分,但不是临终关怀团队的一部分。然而,关于临终关怀环境中的医疗实践,几乎没有相关文献。因此,我们想知道医生如何在多专业环境中反思自己在临终关怀中的角色,他们如何与患者、亲属、护理人员和其他医生沟通,以及这些沟通过程的局限性是什么。

方法

通过两项定性研究,我们探索了医生如何将自己的活动分类为临终关怀组织的一部分。研究设计遵循扎根理论程序。

结果

医生将对患者意愿的适当解释命名为日常实践的挑战,这可能导致与相关人员的观点分歧:与护理人员,他们更倾向于替代形式的药物治疗;与亲属,他们不接受患者拒绝营养;与其他医生,他们对适当的治疗有不同的看法。对于医生来说,由于患者的病情,与患者的沟通变得越来越不确定,这就更加具有挑战性。医疗措施必须在几个层面上进行反复协商。

结论

必须处理观点差异的多专业组织通过明确区分责任领域来处理这些差异,医生也为自己主张这一点。对于医生来说,他们反复面临的问题是,他们是否正确地解释了患者的意愿。他们必须不断让自己确信患者的意愿,这不仅给他们与患者的沟通带来了挑战,也给护理人员和亲属带来了挑战,最近还与他们的同事带来了挑战。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Hospital doctors' experiences of caring for dying patients.
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018 Dec;48(4):299-303. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2018.403.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验