• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对重度肥胖成年人的基于小组的体重管理行为干预(PROGROUP)与常规护理的比较:一项可行性随机对照试验方案

A group-based behavioural intervention for weight management (PROGROUP) versus usual care in adults with severe obesity: a feasibility randomised controlled trial protocol.

作者信息

Swancutt Dawn, Tarrant Mark, Ingram Wendy, Baldrey Sarah, Burns Lorna, Byng Richard, Calitri Raff, Creanor Siobhan, Dean Sarah, Evans Lucy, Gill Laura, Goodwin Elizabeth, Hawkins Lily, Hayward Chris, Hind Sarah, Hollands Laura, Hosking Joanne, Lloyd Jenny, Moghadam Shokraneh, Neilens Helen, O'Kane Mary, Perry Steve, Sheaff Rod, Spencer Anne, Taylor Adrian, Ward Thomas, Watkins Ross, Wilding John, Pinkney Jonathan

机构信息

University of Plymouth, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK.

University of Exeter, College of Medicine and Health, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Sep 10;8(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01167-0.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-022-01167-0
PMID:36088457
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9463813/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15 million people in the UK live with obesity, around 5 million of whom have severe obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥35kg/m). Having severe obesity markedly compromises health, well-being and quality of life, and substantially reduces life expectancy. These adverse outcomes are prevented or ameliorated by weight loss, for which sustained behavioural change is the cornerstone of treatment. Although NHS specialist 'Tier 3' Weight Management Services (T3WMS) support people with severe obesity, using individual and group-based treatment, the current evidence on optimal intervention design and outcomes is limited. Due to heterogeneity of severe obesity, there is a need to tailor treatment to address individual needs. Despite this heterogeneity, there are good reasons to suspect that a structured group-based behavioural intervention may be more effective and cost-effective for the treatment of severe obesity compared to usual care. The aims of this study are to test the feasibility of establishing and delivering a multi-centre randomised controlled clinical trial to compare a group-based behavioural intervention versus usual care in people with severe obesity.

METHODS

This feasibility randomised controlled study is a partially clustered multi-centre trial of PROGROUP (a novel group-based behavioural intervention) versus usual care. Adults ≥18 years of age who have been newly referred to and accepted by NHS T3WMS will be eligible if they have a BMI ≥40, or ≥35 kg/m with comorbidity, are suitable for group-based care and are willing to be randomised. Exclusion criteria are participation in another weight management study, planned bariatric surgery during the trial, and unwillingness or inability to attend group sessions. Outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation and success of blinding will be evaluated. Clinical measures will be collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months post-randomisation. Secondary outcome measures will be self-reported and collected remotely. Process and economic evaluations will be conducted.

DISCUSSION

This randomised feasibility study has been designed to test all the required research procedures and additionally explore three key issues; the feasibility of implementing a complex trial at participating NHS T3WMS, training the multidisciplinary healthcare teams in a standard intervention, and the acceptability of a group intervention for these particularly complex patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN number 22088800.

摘要

背景

英国约有1500万人患有肥胖症,其中约500万人患有重度肥胖症(体重指数(BMI)≥35kg/m²)。患有重度肥胖症会显著损害健康、幸福感和生活质量,并大幅缩短预期寿命。体重减轻可预防或改善这些不良后果,而持续的行为改变是治疗的基石。尽管英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的专科“三级”体重管理服务(T3WMS)通过个体化和基于小组的治疗方式为重度肥胖症患者提供支持,但目前关于最佳干预设计和效果的证据有限。由于重度肥胖症存在异质性,需要针对个体需求进行个性化治疗。尽管存在这种异质性,但有充分理由怀疑,与常规护理相比,结构化的基于小组的行为干预可能对重度肥胖症的治疗更有效且更具成本效益。本研究的目的是测试开展一项多中心随机对照临床试验的可行性,该试验旨在比较基于小组的行为干预与重度肥胖症患者的常规护理。

方法

这项可行性随机对照研究是一项部分整群多中心试验,比较PROGROUP(一种新型的基于小组的行为干预)与常规护理。年龄≥18岁、新被NHS T3WMS转诊并接受的成年人,若BMI≥40或BMI≥35kg/m²且伴有合并症、适合接受基于小组的护理且愿意被随机分组,则符合入选标准。排除标准包括参与另一项体重管理研究、在试验期间计划进行减肥手术,以及不愿意或无法参加小组会议。结果评估人员将对治疗分配不知情,并且将评估设盲的成功性。将在随机分组后的基线、6个月和12个月收集临床指标。次要结果指标将通过自我报告并远程收集。将进行过程评估和经济学评估。

讨论

这项随机可行性研究旨在测试所有必需的研究程序,并额外探索三个关键问题;在参与的NHS T3WMS实施一项复杂试验的可行性、对多学科医疗团队进行标准干预培训,以及这种小组干预对这些特别复杂患者的可接受性。

试验注册

国际标准随机对照试验编号22088800。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/9463813/ae439428813d/40814_2022_1167_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/9463813/ae439428813d/40814_2022_1167_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/9463813/ae439428813d/40814_2022_1167_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A group-based behavioural intervention for weight management (PROGROUP) versus usual care in adults with severe obesity: a feasibility randomised controlled trial protocol.一项针对重度肥胖成年人的基于小组的体重管理行为干预(PROGROUP)与常规护理的比较:一项可行性随机对照试验方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Sep 10;8(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01167-0.
2
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
3
Behavioural activation therapy for post-stroke depression: the BEADS feasibility RCT.行为激活疗法治疗脑卒中后抑郁:BEADS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(47):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta23470.
4
A feasibility randomised controlled trial of a motivational interviewing-based intervention for weight loss maintenance in adults.一项针对成年人减肥维持的基于动机性访谈干预的可行性随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(50):v-vi, xix-xxv, 1-378. doi: 10.3310/hta19500.
5
Carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home: the CARiAD feasibility RCT.居家临终患者按需皮下注射治疗突破性症状的照护者管理:CARiAD 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 May;24(25):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta24250.
6
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
7
Effect of dexamethasone in patients with ARDS and COVID-19 - prospective, multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (REMED trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.地塞米松治疗 ARDS 合并 COVID-19 患者的效果 - 一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验(REMED 试验):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Mar 1;22(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05116-9.
8
Preoperative behavioural intervention to reduce drinking before elective orthopaedic surgery: the PRE-OP BIRDS feasibility RCT.择期骨科手术前行为干预以减少饮酒:PRE-OP BIRDS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(12):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta24120.
9
Sexual health promotion in people with severe mental illness: the RESPECT feasibility RCT.严重精神疾病患者的性健康促进:尊重可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Dec;23(65):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta23650.
10
Group cognitive-behavioural programme to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis fatigue: the RAFT RCT with economic and qualitative evaluations.群组认知行为方案对减轻类风湿关节炎疲劳的影响:RAFT RCT 伴有经济和定性评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(57):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta23570.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences in healthcare for weight management - a qualitative interview study of retired individuals with obesity and low or high education.体重管理方面的医疗保健经验——一项针对肥胖且受教育程度较低或较高的退休个体的定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 26;24(1):1285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11777-4.

本文引用的文献

1
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
2
Social identification-building interventions to improve health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.社会认同建设干预措施对健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;15(1):85-112. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1669481. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
3
Identifying change processes in group-based health behaviour-change interventions: development of the mechanisms of action in group-based interventions (MAGI) framework.
识别基于群体的健康行为改变干预中的变化过程:基于群体干预行动机制(MAGI)框架的开发
Health Psychol Rev. 2019 Sep;13(3):227-247. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1625282. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
4
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
How Group-Based Interventions Can Improve Services for People with Severe Obesity.基于群体的干预措施如何改善严重肥胖人群的服务。
Curr Obes Rep. 2019 Sep;8(3):333-339. doi: 10.1007/s13679-019-00348-y.
6
How and why weight stigma drives the obesity 'epidemic' and harms health.体重歧视如何以及为何推动肥胖“流行”并危害健康。
BMC Med. 2018 Aug 15;16(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1116-5.
7
Group-Based Diet and Physical Activity Weight-Loss Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.基于群组的饮食和身体活动减肥干预措施:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2018 Mar;10(1):62-86. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12121. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
8
Productivity loss due to overweight and obesity: a systematic review of indirect costs.超重和肥胖导致的生产力损失:间接成本的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 5;7(10):e014632. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014632.
9
Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years.25年间195个国家超重和肥胖对健康的影响
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):13-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
10
Obesity: a chronic relapsing progressive disease process. A position statement of the World Obesity Federation.肥胖:一种慢性复发性进行性疾病过程。世界肥胖联合会的立场声明。
Obes Rev. 2017 Jul;18(7):715-723. doi: 10.1111/obr.12551. Epub 2017 May 10.