Jing Wang, Xu Ting, Wu Lirong, Lopez Pablo B, Grassberger Clemens, Ellsworth Susannah G, Mohan Radhe, Hobbs Brian P, Blumenschein George R, Tu Janet, Altan Mehmet, Lee Percy, Liao Zhongxing, Lin Steven H
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Oncology, Jinan Central Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 Aug 7;3(9):100391. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100391. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) for NSCLC improves survival, but only in a subset of patients. We investigated the effect of severe radiation-induced lymphopenia (sRIL) on survival in these patients.
Outcomes after CCRT (2010-2019) or CCRT followed by durvalumab (2018-2019) were reviewed. RIL was defined by absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadir in samples collected at end of CCRT; sRIL was defined as nadir ALC less than 0.23 × 10/L (the lowest tertile). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard modeling evaluated associations between clinical variables and survival.
Of 309 patients, 192 (62%) received CCRT only and 117 (38%) CCRT plus durvalumab. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that sRIL was associated with planning target volume (OR = 1.002, = 0.001), stage IIIB disease (OR = 2.77, = 0.04), and baseline ALC (OR = 0.36, < 0.01). Durvalumab extended median PFS (23.3 versus 14.1 mo, = 0.003) and OS (not reached versus 30.8 mo, < 0.01). sRIL predicted poorer PFS and OS in both treatment groups. Among patients with sRIL, durvalumab did not improve survival (median = 24.6 mo versus 18.1 mo CCRT only, = 0.079). On multivariable analyses, sRIL (OR = 1.81, < 0.01) independently predicted poor survival.
Severe RIL compromises survival benefits from durvalumab after CCRT for NSCLC. Measures to mitigate RIL after CCRT may be warranted to enhance the benefit of consolidation durvalumab.
同步放化疗(CCRT)后使用度伐利尤单抗可改善非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存率,但仅在部分患者中有效。我们研究了严重放射性淋巴细胞减少(sRIL)对这些患者生存的影响。
回顾了CCRT(2010 - 2019年)或CCRT后使用度伐利尤单抗(2018 - 2019年)后的结果。放射性淋巴细胞减少(RIL)通过CCRT结束时采集样本中的绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC)最低点来定义;sRIL定义为最低点ALC低于0.23×10⁹/L(最低三分位数)。无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)采用Kaplan - Meier法计算。Cox比例风险模型评估临床变量与生存之间的关联。
309例患者中,192例(62%)仅接受CCRT,117例(38%)接受CCRT加度伐利尤单抗。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,sRIL与计划靶体积(OR = 1.002,P = 0.001)、IIIB期疾病(OR = 2.77,P = 0.04)和基线ALC(OR = 0.36,P < 0.01)相关。度伐利尤单抗延长了中位PFS(23.3个月对14.1个月,P = 0.003)和OS(未达到对30.8个月,P < 0.01)。sRIL在两个治疗组中均预示着较差的PFS和OS。在sRIL患者中,度伐利尤单抗未改善生存(中位生存期 = 24.6个月对仅CCRT的18.1个月,P = 0.079)。多变量分析显示,sRIL(OR = 1.81,P < 0.01)独立预测生存不良。
严重RIL会损害NSCLC患者CCRT后使用度伐利尤单抗的生存获益。可能需要采取措施减轻CCRT后的RIL,以增强巩固使用度伐利尤单抗的获益。