Suppr超能文献

非洲的代际流动

Intergenerational Mobility in Africa.

作者信息

Alesina Alberto, Hohmann Sebastian, Michalopoulos Stelios, Papaioannou Elias

机构信息

Harvard University, IGIER, CEPR and NBER.

Brown University, CEPR and NBER.

出版信息

Econometrica. 2021 Jan;89(1):1-35. doi: 10.3982/ecta17018.

Abstract

We examine intergenerational mobility (IM) in educational attainment in Africa since independence using census data. First, we map IM across 27 countries and more than 2,800 regions, documenting wide cross-country and especially within-country heterogeneity. Inertia looms large as differences in the literacy of the old generation explain about half of the observed spatial disparities in IM. The rural-urban divide is substantial. Though conspicuous in some countries, there is no evidence of systematic gender gaps in IM. Second, we characterize the geography of IM, finding that colonial investments in railroads and Christian missions, as well as proximity to capitals and the coastline are the strongest correlates. Third, we ask whether the regional differences in mobility reflect spatial sorting or their independent role. To isolate the two, we focus on children whose families moved when they were young. Comparing siblings, looking at moves triggered by displacement shocks, and using historical migrations to predict moving-families' destinations, we establish that, while selection is considerable, regional exposure effects are at play. An extra year spent in a high-mobility region before the age of 12 (and after 5) significantly raises the likelihood for children of uneducated parents to complete primary school. Overall, the evidence suggests that geographic and historical factors laid the seeds for spatial disparities in IM that are cemented by sorting and the independent impact of regions.

摘要

我们利用人口普查数据研究了非洲自独立以来教育程度方面的代际流动性(IM)。首先,我们绘制了27个国家和2800多个地区的IM情况,记录了广泛的跨国差异,尤其是国内差异。由于老一代识字率的差异解释了IM中观察到的空间差异的约一半,惯性显得尤为突出。城乡差距很大。虽然在一些国家很明显,但没有证据表明IM中存在系统性的性别差距。其次,我们描述了IM的地理特征,发现殖民时期对铁路和基督教传教团的投资,以及与首都和海岸线的距离是最密切的相关因素。第三,我们询问流动性的区域差异是反映空间分选还是其独立作用。为了区分这两者,我们关注那些在年幼时家庭搬迁的儿童。通过比较兄弟姐妹、观察由流离失所冲击引发的搬迁,并利用历史移民来预测搬迁家庭的目的地,我们确定,虽然分选作用相当大,但区域接触效应也在发挥作用。在12岁之前(以及5岁之后)在高流动性地区度过额外一年,显著提高了父母未受过教育的儿童完成小学学业的可能性。总体而言,证据表明地理和历史因素为IM中的空间差异埋下了种子,这些差异通过分选和区域的独立影响而得到强化。

相似文献

1
Intergenerational Mobility in Africa.非洲的代际流动
Econometrica. 2021 Jan;89(1):1-35. doi: 10.3982/ecta17018.
3
Intergenerational educational mobility in Bangladesh.孟加拉国代际教育流动。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 30;16(7):e0255426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255426. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
What really matters for global intergenerational mobility?什么对全球代际流动性真正重要?
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 20;19(6):e0302173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302173. eCollection 2024.
2
The Intergenerational Transmission of Health Disadvantage: Can Education Disrupt It?健康劣势的代际传递:教育能否打破它?
J Health Soc Behav. 2024 Dec;65(4):577-595. doi: 10.1177/00221465241246250. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
3
Religion and educational mobility in Africa.宗教与非洲的教育流动。
Nature. 2023 Jun;618(7963):134-143. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06051-2. Epub 2023 May 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验