Coffin Allison B, Dale Emily, Doppenberg Emilee, Fearington Forrest, Hayward Tamasen, Hill Jordan, Molano Olivia
Department of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, United States.
College of Arts and Sciences, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, United States.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 24;16:941031. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.941031. eCollection 2022.
The biomedical community is rapidly developing COVID-19 drugs to bring much-need therapies to market, with over 900 drugs and drug combinations currently in clinical trials. While this pace of drug development is necessary, the risk of producing therapies with significant side-effects is also increased. One likely side-effect of some COVID-19 drugs is hearing loss, yet hearing is not assessed during preclinical development or clinical trials. We used the zebrafish lateral line, an established model for drug-induced sensory hair cell damage, to assess the ototoxic potential of seven drugs in clinical trials for treatment of COVID-19. We found that ivermectin, lopinavir, imatinib, and ritonavir were significantly toxic to lateral line hair cells. By contrast, the approved COVID-19 therapies dexamethasone and remdesivir did not cause damage. We also did not observe damage from the antibiotic azithromycin. Neither lopinavir nor ritonavir altered the number of pre-synaptic ribbons per surviving hair cell, while there was an increase in ribbons following imatinib or ivermectin exposure. Damage from lopinavir, imatinib, and ivermectin was specific to hair cells, with no overall cytotoxicity noted following TUNEL labeling. Ritonavir may be generally cytotoxic, as determined by an increase in the number of TUNEL-positive non-hair cells following ritonavir exposure. Pharmacological inhibition of the mechanotransduction (MET) channel attenuated damage caused by lopinavir and ritonavir but did not alter imatinib or ivermectin toxicity. These results suggest that lopinavir and ritonavir may enter hair cells through the MET channel, similar to known ototoxins such as aminoglycoside antibiotics. Finally, we asked if ivermectin was ototoxic to rats . While ivermectin is not recommended by the FDA for treating COVID-19, many people have chosen to take ivermectin without a doctor's guidance, often with serious side-effects. Rats received daily subcutaneous injections for 10 days with a clinically relevant ivermectin dose (0.2 mg/kg). In contrast to our zebrafish assays, ivermectin did not cause ototoxicity in rats. Our research suggests that some drugs in clinical trials for COVID-19 may be ototoxic. This work can help identify drugs with the fewest side-effects and determine which therapies warrant audiometric monitoring.
生物医学界正在迅速研发治疗新冠肺炎的药物,以便将急需的疗法推向市场,目前有900多种药物及药物组合正处于临床试验阶段。虽然这种药物研发速度是必要的,但产生具有显著副作用的疗法的风险也在增加。一些新冠肺炎药物可能产生的一种副作用是听力丧失,然而在临床前开发或临床试验过程中并未对听力进行评估。我们利用斑马鱼侧线这一已确立的药物诱导感觉毛细胞损伤模型,来评估7种用于治疗新冠肺炎的临床试验药物的耳毒性潜力。我们发现,伊维菌素、洛匹那韦、伊马替尼和利托那韦对侧线毛细胞具有显著毒性。相比之下,已获批的新冠肺炎治疗药物地塞米松和瑞德西韦并未造成损伤。我们也未观察到抗生素阿奇霉素造成损伤。洛匹那韦和利托那韦均未改变每个存活毛细胞的突触前带状小体数量,而在暴露于伊马替尼或伊维菌素后带状小体数量增加。洛匹那韦、伊马替尼和伊维菌素造成的损伤具有毛细胞特异性,在TUNEL标记后未发现总体细胞毒性。利托那韦可能具有普遍的细胞毒性,这是通过利托那韦暴露后TUNEL阳性非毛细胞数量增加来确定的。对机械转导(MET)通道的药理学抑制减弱了洛匹那韦和利托那韦造成的损伤,但未改变伊马替尼或伊维菌素的毒性。这些结果表明,洛匹那韦和利托那韦可能通过MET通道进入毛细胞,类似于氨基糖苷类抗生素等已知耳毒素。最后,我们询问伊维菌素对大鼠是否具有耳毒性。虽然美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)不推荐使用伊维菌素治疗新冠肺炎,但许多人在没有医生指导的情况下选择服用伊维菌素,往往会产生严重的副作用。大鼠连续10天每天接受皮下注射具有临床相关剂量的伊维菌素(0.2毫克/千克)。与我们的斑马鱼试验不同,伊维菌素在大鼠中未造成耳毒性。我们的研究表明,一些用于新冠肺炎临床试验的药物可能具有耳毒性。这项工作有助于识别副作用最少的药物,并确定哪些疗法需要进行听力测定监测。