Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.
Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Initiative (HI3), Department of Immunology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.
Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 24;13:953439. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.953439. eCollection 2022.
Most B cells produced in the bone marrow have some level of autoreactivity. Despite efforts of central tolerance to eliminate these cells, many escape to periphery, where in healthy individuals, they are rendered functionally non-responsive to restimulation through their antigen receptor a process termed anergy. Broad repertoire autoreactivity may reflect the chances of generating autoreactivity by stochastic use of germline immunoglobulin gene segments or active mechanisms may select autoreactive cells during egress to the naïve peripheral B cell pool. Likewise, it is unclear why in some individuals autoreactive B cell clones become activated and drive pathophysiologic changes in autoimmune diseases. Both of these remain central questions in the study of the immune system(s). In most individuals, autoimmune diseases arise from complex interplay of genetic risk factors and environmental influences. Advances in genome sequencing and increased statistical power from large autoimmune disease cohorts has led to identification of more than 200 autoimmune disease risk loci. It has been observed that autoantibodies are detectable in the serum years to decades prior to the diagnosis of autoimmune disease. Thus, current models hold that genetic defects in the pathways that control autoreactive B cell tolerance set genetic liability thresholds across multiple autoimmune diseases. Despite the fact these seminal concepts were developed in animal (especially murine) models of autoimmune disease, some perceive a disconnect between human risk alleles and those identified in murine models of autoimmune disease. Here, we synthesize the current state of the art in our understanding of human risk alleles in two prototypical autoimmune diseases - systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and type 1 diabetes (T1D) along with spontaneous murine disease models. We compare these risk networks to those reported in murine models of these diseases, focusing on pathways relevant to anergy and central tolerance. We highlight some differences between murine and human environmental and genetic factors that may impact autoimmune disease development and expression and may, in turn, explain some of this discrepancy. Finally, we show that there is substantial overlap between the molecular networks that define these disease states across species. Our synthesis and analysis of the current state of the field are consistent with the idea that the same molecular networks are perturbed in murine and human autoimmune disease. Based on these analyses, we anticipate that murine autoimmune disease models will continue to yield novel insights into how best to diagnose, prognose, prevent and treat human autoimmune diseases.
大多数在骨髓中产生的 B 细胞都具有一定程度的自身反应性。尽管中枢耐受努力消除这些细胞,但许多细胞逃到外周,在健康个体中,它们通过其抗原受体被赋予对再刺激无功能反应的能力,这一过程称为无能。广泛的受体自身反应性可能反映了通过随机使用 germline 免疫球蛋白基因片段产生自身反应性的机会,或者在向幼稚外周 B 细胞池排出时,主动机制可能选择自身反应性细胞。同样,为什么在某些个体中,自身反应性 B 细胞克隆会被激活,并导致自身免疫性疾病中的病理生理变化,这仍然是免疫系统研究的核心问题。在大多数个体中,自身免疫性疾病是由遗传风险因素和环境影响的复杂相互作用引起的。基因组测序的进展和来自大型自身免疫性疾病队列的统计能力的增加,导致了 200 多个自身免疫性疾病风险位点的鉴定。已经观察到,自身抗体可在自身免疫性疾病诊断前数年至数十年在血清中检测到。因此,目前的模型认为,控制自身反应性 B 细胞耐受的途径中的遗传缺陷在多种自身免疫性疾病中设定了遗传易感性阈值。尽管这些开创性的概念是在自身免疫性疾病的动物(特别是鼠)模型中发展起来的,但有些人认为人类风险等位基因与自身免疫性疾病的鼠模型中鉴定的风险等位基因之间存在脱节。在这里,我们综合了目前对两种典型自身免疫性疾病 - 系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)和 1 型糖尿病(T1D)以及自发性鼠疾病模型中人类风险等位基因的理解的最新进展。我们将这些风险网络与这些疾病的鼠模型中报告的网络进行比较,重点关注与无能和中枢耐受相关的途径。我们强调了影响自身免疫性疾病发展和表达的人类环境和遗传因素之间的一些差异,并可能反过来解释这种差异的一些原因。最后,我们表明,跨物种定义这些疾病状态的分子网络之间存在很大的重叠。我们对该领域当前状态的综合分析和分析与这样的观点一致,即相同的分子网络在鼠和人类自身免疫性疾病中受到干扰。基于这些分析,我们预计鼠自身免疫性疾病模型将继续为如何最好地诊断、预测、预防和治疗人类自身免疫性疾病提供新的见解。