• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I期和II期老年肝细胞癌患者(≥65岁)手术切除与射频消融的比较:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的倾向评分匹配研究

Comparison of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for stages I and II elderly hepatocellular carcinoma patients (≥ 65 years): A SEER population-based propensity score matching's study.

作者信息

Xie Qingqing, Yang Yongwen, Qu Bin, Xiao Ping, Tang Faqing, Shen Haoming

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Liuzhou, China.

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 25;12:903231. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.903231. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.903231
PMID:36091155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9453450/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial and limited in elderly patients. Therefore, we aimed to explore treatment choices for the elderly patients (≥ 65years) following surgical resection (SR) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with HCC (single lesion less than 5 cm).

METHODS

We used SEER database to identify HCC patients who received treatment of SR/RFA. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression method were used to determine the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). In addition, RFA group and SR group patients were matched with 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for diagnosis age, sex, race, marital, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), grade, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy to decrease the possibility of selection bias. Conditional disease-specific survival (CS) was estimated using the life-table method.

RESULTS

A total of 794 patients who underwent SR and 811 patients who underwent RFA were confirmed from the SEER database. Surgery type was an independent risk factor for HCC. Survival analysis indicated that SR, races, AJCC I, no chemotherapy treatment, and grade I were cumulative risk factors that can significantly improve median survival for HCC ( < 0.05). After PSM analysis, only surgery type was significantly improved median survival of HCC patients (SR vs. RFA, HR: 0.644, 95% CI: 0.482-0.86; < 0.001). For RFA group, the 2-, 3-, and 5-year CS rates were approximately 71%, 65%, and 62%, respectively, and corresponding to 82%, 80%, and 78% in the SR group.

CONCLUSION

SR treatment can provide survival benefits for elderly patients of <5 cm single lesion HCC.

摘要

目的

肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗在老年患者中仍存在争议且受限。因此,我们旨在探讨老年患者(≥65岁)手术切除(SR)与射频消融(RFA)治疗单病灶小于5 cm的HCC后的治疗选择。

方法

我们使用监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据库来识别接受SR/RFA治疗的HCC患者。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险回归法确定与总生存期(OS)和疾病特异性生存期(DSS)相关的预后因素。此外,对RFA组和SR组患者按1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行诊断年龄、性别、种族、婚姻状况、美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期、分级、放疗和化疗匹配,以降低选择偏倚的可能性。采用寿命表法估计条件疾病特异性生存期(CS)。

结果

从SEER数据库中确认了794例行SR的患者和811例行RFA的患者。手术类型是HCC的独立危险因素。生存分析表明,SR、种族、AJCC I期、未接受化疗治疗和I级是可显著提高HCC患者中位生存期的累积危险因素(P<0.05)。PSM分析后,仅手术类型可显著提高HCC患者的中位生存期(SR与RFA相比,HR:0.644,95%CI:0.482-0.86;P<0.001)。对于RFA组,2年、3年和5年的CS率分别约为71%、65%和62%,SR组相应为82%、80%和78%。

结论

SR治疗可为单病灶小于5 cm的老年HCC患者提供生存获益。

相似文献

1
Comparison of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for stages I and II elderly hepatocellular carcinoma patients (≥ 65 years): A SEER population-based propensity score matching's study.I期和II期老年肝细胞癌患者(≥65岁)手术切除与射频消融的比较:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的倾向评分匹配研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 25;12:903231. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.903231. eCollection 2022.
2
Clinical outcomes of surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation in very-early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.非常早期肝细胞癌手术切除与射频消融治疗的临床结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov 8;21(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01995-z.
3
The Efficacy of Surgical Resection versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A SEER-Based Study.手术切除与射频消融治疗单发性肝细胞癌的疗效:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的研究
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2023 Feb 21;2023:1269504. doi: 10.1155/2023/1269504. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of overall survival on surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization with or without radiofrequency ablation in intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.对比中期肝细胞癌手术切除与肝动脉化疗栓塞联合或不联合射频消融的总生存率:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 10;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01235-w.
5
Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of organ shortage.在器官短缺时代,老年早期肝细胞癌患者的射频消融与手术切除对比研究
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov-Dec;24(6):317-325. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_261_18.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation, Surgical Resection and Transplantation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Cancer Risk Groups: Results of Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis.按癌症风险分组比较射频消融、手术切除和肝移植治疗早期肝细胞癌的疗效:倾向评分加权分析结果
Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Nov 29;12:10389-10400. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S224809. eCollection 2019.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Patients With Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Smaller Than 5 cm.射频消融术与手术切除治疗直径小于5cm的孤立性肝细胞癌患者的疗效比较
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 31;10:399. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00399. eCollection 2020.
8
Surgical Resection Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma ≤ 2  cm in a Propensity Score Model.倾向评分模型中,手术切除与射频消融治疗直径≤2cm的单发肝细胞癌的比较
Ann Surg. 2016 Mar;263(3):538-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001178.
9
Surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation very early-stage HCC (≤2 cm Single HCC): A propensity score analysis.手术切除与射频消融治疗极早期 HCC(≤2cm 单发 HCC):倾向评分分析。
Liver Int. 2019 Dec;39(12):2397-2407. doi: 10.1111/liv.14258. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
10
The risk factors for long-term survival outcome in solitary hepatocellular carcinoma up to 2 cm: Propensity score matching analysis in a population cohort with a high rate of HBV infection.2cm 以内单发肝细胞癌长期生存预后的危险因素:高乙肝病毒感染率人群队列的倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Competing risk analysis of surgical resection radiofrequency ablation in early-stage small hepatocellular carcinoma: a SEER-based study.早期小肝细胞癌手术切除与射频消融的竞争风险分析:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):3565-3576. doi: 10.21037/tcr-2024-2550. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
2
Landmark analysis of the risk of recurrence after resection or ablation for HCC: A nationwide study.肝癌切除或消融后复发风险的里程碑分析:一项全国性研究。
Hepatol Commun. 2024 Jun 19;8(7). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000472. eCollection 2024 Jul 1.
3
Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Elderly: Slash or Burn?

本文引用的文献

1
Liver Transplantation for Pediatric Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.小儿肝细胞癌的肝移植:一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 2;14(5):1294. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051294.
2
Comparison of Overall Survival between Surgical Resection and Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatitis B-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma.乙型肝炎相关肝细胞癌手术切除与射频消融的总生存率比较
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 29;13(23):6009. doi: 10.3390/cancers13236009.
3
Evaluation of clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma conforming to the Milan criteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials.
老年肝细胞癌的治疗:大刀阔斧还是循序渐进?
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Mar;69(3):662-663. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08247-y. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
4
Construction of a Nomogram to Predict Overall Survival in Patients with Early-Onset Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.构建预测早发性肝细胞癌患者总生存期的列线图:一项回顾性队列研究
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 7;15(22):5310. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225310.
评价符合米兰标准的肝细胞癌的射频消融与手术切除的临床结局:近期随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;36(7):1769-1777. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15440. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
4
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.射频消融与肝切除术治疗复发性肝细胞癌:一项更新的荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov 27;20(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01544-0.
6
Liver Resection Versus Local Ablation Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within the Milan Criteria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.米兰标准范围内肝细胞癌的肝切除术与局部消融治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):656-666. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004350.
7
Radiofrequency combined with immunomodulation for hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and innovations.射频联合免疫调节治疗肝细胞癌:现状与创新。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 May 7;26(17):2040-2048. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i17.2040.
8
Surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer very early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results of a single-center study.手术切除与射频消融治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌极早期肝癌:单中心研究的长期结果。
Am J Surg. 2020 Oct;220(4):958-964. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
9
Stereotactic body radiation therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation in Asian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.立体定向体部放疗与射频消融治疗亚洲肝细胞癌患者的比较。
J Hepatol. 2020 Jul;73(1):121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
10
Updated 10-year outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation as first-line therapy for single hepatocellular carcinoma < 3 cm: emphasis on association of local tumor progression and overall survival.更新的经皮射频消融作为单一肝细胞癌 < 3cm 的一线治疗 10 年结果:强调局部肿瘤进展与总生存的关系。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):2391-2400. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06575-0. Epub 2020 Jan 3.