• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术切除与射频消融治疗单发性肝细胞癌的疗效:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的研究

The Efficacy of Surgical Resection versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A SEER-Based Study.

作者信息

Wu Fang, Wei Chao, Zhang Shicun, Jia Shanshan, Zhang Jidong

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, School of Clinical Medical, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, 154007, Heilongjiang Province, China.

Department of Medical Oncology, The Seventh Hospital of Qiqihar, Qiqihar, 161000, Heilongjiang Province, China.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2023 Feb 21;2023:1269504. doi: 10.1155/2023/1269504. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1155/2023/1269504
PMID:36865983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9974275/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding whether patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) should be offered radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as a first-line treatment option. Thus, this study compared overall survival after surgical resection (SR) and RFA for single HCC.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used for this retrospective study. The study included 30- to 84-year-old patients diagnosed with HCC from 2000 to 2018. Selection bias was reduced via propensity score matching (PSM). The study compared the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with single HCC who were treated with SR and RFA.

RESULTS

Before and after PSM, the median OS and median CSS were significantly longer in the SR group than in the RFA group ( < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, the median OS and median CSS for male and female patients with male and female patients with tumor sizes <3, 3-5, and>5 cm, age at diagnosis between 60 and 84 years, and grades I-IV tumors were longer than in the SR group than in the RFA group ( < 0.05). Similar results were reported for patients who received chemotherapy ( < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that compared with RFA, SR was an independent favorable factor for OS and CSS ( < 0.05) before and after PSM.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SR who had a single HCC showed higher OS and CSS compared with patients who received RFA. Hence, SR should be used as a first-line treatment in cases of single HCC.

摘要

背景

对于单发肝细胞癌(HCC)患者是否应将射频消融(RFA)作为一线治疗方案存在争议。因此,本研究比较了单发HCC患者手术切除(SR)和RFA后的总生存期。

方法

本回顾性研究使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库。研究纳入了2000年至2018年诊断为HCC的30至84岁患者。通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)减少选择偏倚。该研究比较了接受SR和RFA治疗的单发HCC患者的总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。

结果

在PSM前后,SR组的中位OS和中位CSS均显著长于RFA组(<0.05)。在亚组分析中,肿瘤大小<3 cm、3 - 5 cm和>5 cm的男性和女性患者,诊断时年龄在60至84岁之间,以及I - IV级肿瘤的男性和女性患者,其SR组的中位OS和中位CSS均长于RFA组(<0.05)。接受化疗的患者也报告了类似结果(<0.05)。单因素和多因素分析显示,与RFA相比,PSM前后SR都是OS和CSS的独立有利因素(<0.05)。

结论

与接受RFA的患者相比,接受SR治疗的单发HCC患者表现出更高的OS和CSS。因此,SR应作为单发HCC病例的一线治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/3760b4eec752/GRP2023-1269504.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/76ee064e9a4a/GRP2023-1269504.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/816b7aa8ec8c/GRP2023-1269504.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/2c87a2b212d3/GRP2023-1269504.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/c96410440a22/GRP2023-1269504.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/f8596ff7738f/GRP2023-1269504.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/3760b4eec752/GRP2023-1269504.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/76ee064e9a4a/GRP2023-1269504.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/816b7aa8ec8c/GRP2023-1269504.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/2c87a2b212d3/GRP2023-1269504.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/c96410440a22/GRP2023-1269504.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/f8596ff7738f/GRP2023-1269504.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/9974275/3760b4eec752/GRP2023-1269504.006.jpg

相似文献

1
The Efficacy of Surgical Resection versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A SEER-Based Study.手术切除与射频消融治疗单发性肝细胞癌的疗效:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的研究
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2023 Feb 21;2023:1269504. doi: 10.1155/2023/1269504. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Patients With Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Smaller Than 5 cm.射频消融术与手术切除治疗直径小于5cm的孤立性肝细胞癌患者的疗效比较
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 31;10:399. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00399. eCollection 2020.
3
Clinical outcomes of surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation in very-early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.非常早期肝细胞癌手术切除与射频消融治疗的临床结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov 8;21(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01995-z.
4
The efficacy of radiofrequency ablation versus cryoablation in the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma: A population-based study.射频消融与冷冻消融治疗单个肝细胞癌的疗效比较:基于人群的研究。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jun;10(11):3715-3725. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3923. Epub 2021 May 7.
5
Comparison of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for stages I and II elderly hepatocellular carcinoma patients (≥ 65 years): A SEER population-based propensity score matching's study.I期和II期老年肝细胞癌患者(≥65岁)手术切除与射频消融的比较:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的倾向评分匹配研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 25;12:903231. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.903231. eCollection 2022.
6
Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of organ shortage.在器官短缺时代,老年早期肝细胞癌患者的射频消融与手术切除对比研究
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov-Dec;24(6):317-325. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_261_18.
7
Comparison of overall survival on surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization with or without radiofrequency ablation in intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.对比中期肝细胞癌手术切除与肝动脉化疗栓塞联合或不联合射频消融的总生存率:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 10;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01235-w.
8
Surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation very early-stage HCC (≤2 cm Single HCC): A propensity score analysis.手术切除与射频消融治疗极早期 HCC(≤2cm 单发 HCC):倾向评分分析。
Liver Int. 2019 Dec;39(12):2397-2407. doi: 10.1111/liv.14258. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
9
Surgical resection plus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma.手术切除联合射频消融治疗多灶性肝细胞癌
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019 Feb;8(1):19-28. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.11.19.
10
Surgical Resection Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma ≤ 2  cm in a Propensity Score Model.倾向评分模型中,手术切除与射频消融治疗直径≤2cm的单发肝细胞癌的比较
Ann Surg. 2016 Mar;263(3):538-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001178.

本文引用的文献

1
BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update.BCLC 策略用于预后预测和治疗推荐:2022 年更新版。
J Hepatol. 2022 Mar;76(3):681-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
2
Clinical outcomes of surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation in very-early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.非常早期肝细胞癌手术切除与射频消融治疗的临床结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov 8;21(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01995-z.
3
Comparison of 10-Year Survival Outcomes for Early Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma following Different Treatments.
比较不同治疗方案下早期单发肝细胞癌患者的 10 年生存结局。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Mar 19;2021:6638117. doi: 10.1155/2021/6638117. eCollection 2021.
4
Laparoscopic Liver Resection versus Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Single Nodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of Treatment Outcomes.腹腔镜肝切除术与经皮射频消融术治疗小的单结节肝细胞癌:治疗结果比较
Liver Cancer. 2021 Feb;10(1):25-37. doi: 10.1159/000510909. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
5
A practical nomogram and risk stratification system predicting the cancer-specific survival for patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma.用于预测早期肝细胞癌患者癌症特异性生存的实用列线图和风险分层系统。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jan;10(2):496-506. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3613. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
6
Surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation very early-stage HCC (≤2 cm Single HCC): A propensity score analysis.手术切除与射频消融治疗极早期 HCC(≤2cm 单发 HCC):倾向评分分析。
Liver Int. 2019 Dec;39(12):2397-2407. doi: 10.1111/liv.14258. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
7
Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods.估算 2018 年全球癌症发病率和死亡率:GLOBOCAN 来源和方法。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
8
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Radiofrequency ablation vs. surgery for perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: Propensity score analyses of long-term outcomes.射频消融与手术治疗血管周围型肝细胞癌:长期疗效的倾向评分分析。
J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
10
Thermal ablation versus surgical resection for localized hepatocellular carcinoma: a population study using the SEER database.射频消融与手术切除治疗局限性肝细胞癌的比较:基于 SEER 数据库的一项人群研究。
Future Oncol. 2018 Mar;14(7):631-645. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0447. Epub 2018 Mar 8.