Lambie Suzanne M, Awatere Shaun, Daigneault Adam, Kirschbaum Miko U F, Marden Michael, Soliman Tarek, Spiekermann Raphael I, Walsh Patrick J
Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
School of Forest Resources, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, 04469, USA.
N Z J For Sci. 2021;51:1-15. doi: 10.33494/nzjfs512021x163x.
Some of New Zealand's exotic pine ( D.Don) forests were planted for erosion mitigation but cultural, legislative, environmental, and profitability limitations in some parts of the landscape have led to reassessment of their suitability. There is limited information to support landowner decisions on the viability of natural regeneration of native forest post-pine-harvest.
We evaluated scenarios of post-harvest natural regeneration, compared to remaining in pine production, using erosion susceptibility determined from historical occurrence of landslides, gullies and earthflows, biophysical growth modelling of mānuka-kānuka ( (A.Rich) Joy Thomps.) shrubland using the process-based CenW model, and cost-benefit analyses using NZFARM with two land use change scenarios, at two levels of erosion mitigation ± honey profits.
In our study area, the Gisborne Region (North Island of New Zealand), ~27% of the land has moderate-very high susceptibility to landslides, 14-22% a high probability of contributing material to waterways, and 19% moderate-very high gully erosion susceptibility. Pines grow 10 times faster than naturally regenerating mānuka-kānuka shrubland, but mānuka-kānuka is used for honey not wood production. Natural regeneration resulted in losses of $150-250 ha yr compared to the current profitability of pine production. Honey production offset some reduction in pine revenue, but not fully. Thus, the viability of shifting from pines to native forest is highly dependent on landowner impetus and value for non-market ecosystem services (such as cultural and biodiversity values) provided by native forest.
A mosaic of land uses within a property may sufficiently offset income losses with other benefits, whereby highly erosion-prone land is shifted from rotational pine forest production to permanent native forest cover with honey production where possible. At the regional scale in Gisborne, the conversion of the most highly susceptible land under production forestry (315-556 ha) to natural regeneration has the potential for wider benefits for soil conservation reducing erosion by 1-2.5 t yr of sediment facilitating achievement of cleaner water aspirations and habitat provision.
新西兰的一些外来松树(辐射松)林是为减轻水土流失而种植的,但景观某些区域的文化、立法、环境和盈利能力限制导致对其适宜性进行重新评估。支持土地所有者就松树采伐后原生林自然更新可行性做出决策的信息有限。
我们评估了采伐后的自然更新情景,并与继续进行松树生产进行比较,使用根据滑坡、沟壑和泥石流的历史发生情况确定的侵蚀敏感性、使用基于过程的CenW模型对麦卢卡-卡努卡(Leptospermum scoparium (A.Rich) Joy Thomps.)灌丛进行生物物理生长建模,以及使用NZFARM对两种土地利用变化情景在两种减轻侵蚀水平±蜂蜜利润下进行成本效益分析。
在我们的研究区域,吉斯伯恩地区(新西兰北岛),约27%的土地对滑坡具有中度-非常高的敏感性,14 - 22%的土地有很高的可能性向水道输送物质,19%的土地对沟壑侵蚀具有中度-非常高的敏感性。松树的生长速度比自然更新的麦卢卡-卡努卡灌丛快10倍,但麦卢卡-卡努卡用于生产蜂蜜而非木材。与目前松树生产的盈利能力相比,自然更新导致每年每公顷损失150 - 250美元。蜂蜜生产抵消了松树收入的一些减少,但不完全抵消。因此,从松树转向原生林的可行性高度依赖于土地所有者的动力以及原生林提供的非市场生态系统服务(如文化和生物多样性价值)的价值。
在一个地产内采用多种土地利用方式可能会用其他益处充分抵消收入损失,从而将极易发生侵蚀的土地从轮作松树林生产转移到尽可能进行蜂蜜生产的永久性原生林覆盖。在吉斯伯恩的区域尺度上,将生产性林业中最易受影响的土地(315 - 556公顷)转变为自然更新,有可能带来更广泛的益处,包括通过每年减少1 - 2.5吨沉积物来保护土壤、促进实现更清洁的水源目标以及提供栖息地。