Martin Makenna M, Goldberg Fred, McKean Michael, Price Edward, Turpen Chandra
Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92120 USA.
Department of Physics, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, CA 92096 USA.
Int J STEM Educ. 2022;9(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00371-x. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
Faculty Learning Communities (FLCs) and Faculty Online Learning Communities (FOLCs) are ways to support STEM faculty implementing research-based curricula. In these communities, faculty facilitators take on the role of sharing expertise and promoting discussion. However, as members gain more experience, their needs change from addressing logistical to pedagogical issues. Hence, facilitators need to change their practices in response. However, there is little research on the mechanisms of faculty facilitator change. In this article, we provide a case study of a specific STEM FOLC facilitator and demonstrate the usefulness of a teacher change model to investigate facilitator change.
Guided by our adaptation of the we conducted interviews with FOLC facilitators, and selected a case facilitator who reported changes in facilitation goals and strategies over time. The model helped us identify specific areas of change and potential mechanisms for these changes. Using themes of change identified in the case facilitator interview, we developed coding schemes to analyze his FOLC meetings over a 2-year period. We found empirical evidence from multiple data sources, including FOLC meetings and facilitator reflections, that supported the change themes, including: changing his role as an "expert" by sharing his own expertise less and drawing on others' expertise more frequently, changing his response to members' comments by jumping in to answer less frequently and withholding his own responses more often to encourage member sharing, and a change in group discussions towards less logistical and more pedagogical conversations.
Our findings suggest that the IMPG can be fruitfully adapted to study facilitator change. A diagrammatic representation of the IMPG provides a description the types of change the case facilitator experienced and the factors that supported those changes. We discuss how the methodology used to analyze facilitator actions in FOLC group meetings may be useful to study other types of professional growth. Finally, because our analytical model allowed us to identify mechanisms of facilitator change, we describe the implications and provide suggestions to support facilitators in other faculty community groups.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40594-022-00371-x.
教师学习社区(FLC)和教师在线学习社区(FOLC)是支持STEM教师实施基于研究的课程的方式。在这些社区中,教师促进者承担分享专业知识和促进讨论的角色。然而,随着成员获得更多经验,他们的需求从解决后勤问题转变为教学问题。因此,促进者需要相应地改变他们的做法。然而,关于教师促进者改变机制的研究很少。在本文中,我们提供了一个特定STEM FOLC促进者的案例研究,并展示了一个教师改变模型对于研究促进者改变的有用性。
在我们改编的[具体模型名称未给出]的指导下,我们对FOLC促进者进行了访谈,并选择了一位案例促进者,他报告了随着时间推移促进目标和策略的变化。该模型帮助我们确定了具体的变化领域以及这些变化的潜在机制。利用在案例促进者访谈中确定的变化主题,我们制定了编码方案,以分析他在两年期间的FOLC会议。我们从包括FOLC会议和促进者反思在内的多个数据源中找到了实证证据,支持了这些变化主题,包括:通过减少分享自己的专业知识并更频繁地借鉴他人的专业知识来改变他作为“专家”的角色;通过减少直接介入回答并更多地保留自己的回应来鼓励成员分享,从而改变他对成员评论的回应方式;以及小组讨论从更多的后勤话题转向更多的教学话题。
我们的研究结果表明,IMPG可以有效地改编用于研究促进者的改变。IMPG的示意图描述了案例促进者经历的变化类型以及支持这些变化的因素。我们讨论了用于分析FOLC小组会议中促进者行为的方法如何可能有助于研究其他类型的专业成长。最后,因为我们的分析模型使我们能够确定促进者改变的机制,我们描述了其影响并提供了建议,以支持其他教师社区团体中的促进者。
在线版本包含可在10.1186/s40594-022-00371-x获取的补充材料。