Suppr超能文献

美国三个州的油气开采工人自我报告的危害暴露和缓解策略。

Self-reported exposure to hazards and mitigation strategies among oil and gas extraction workers in three U.S. states.

机构信息

Western States Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Denver, Colorado.

Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2022 Oct-Nov;19(10-11):676-689. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2022.2123496. Epub 2022 Oct 7.

Abstract

Numerous health and safety hazards exist at U.S. onshore oil and gas extraction worksites. Higher fatal injury rates have been reported among drilling and servicing companies, which are more likely to employ workers in construction and extraction occupations, compared to operators that employ more workers in management and office and administrative support roles. However, there is little information describing the extent to which workers encounter these hazards, are provided hazard mitigation strategies by their employers, or use personal protective equipment (PPE). A cross-sectional survey of 472 U.S. oil and gas extraction workers was conducted to identify and characterize factors related to on-the-job fatalities, injuries, and illnesses and determine workers' health and safety concerns. Workers were employed by servicing companies (271/472, 57.4%), drilling contractors (106/472, 22.5%), and operators (95/472, 20.1%). The likelihood of contact with hazardous substances varied by substance and company type. Drilling and servicing employees had significantly higher odds of self-reported contact with pipe dope (OR = 10.07, 95% CI: 1.74-63.64; OR = 5.95, 95% CI: 2.18-18.34), diesel exhaust (OR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.15-5.05; OR = 4.93, 95% CI: 2.73-10.32), and drilling mud (OR = 24.36, 95% CI: 4.45-144.69; OR = 3.48, 95% CI: 1.24-12.20), compared to operators. Safety policies, programs, and trainings were commonly reported by workers, although substance-specific training (e.g., respirable crystalline silica hazards) was less common. Differences in self-reported employer PPE requirements and worker use of PPE when needed or required for safety highlight a need for novel strategies to improve the use of PPE. Overall, this study highlights differences in work conditions by company type and uncovers gaps in employer administrative controls and PPE use.

摘要

美国陆上石油和天然气开采作业现场存在大量的健康和安全危害。与从事管理、办公室和行政支持等工作的运营商相比,钻井和服务公司的致命伤害率报告更高,这些公司更有可能雇用从事建筑和开采工作的工人。然而,几乎没有信息描述工人遇到这些危害的程度、雇主为他们提供了减轻危害的策略,或使用个人防护设备 (PPE) 的情况。对 472 名美国石油和天然气开采工人进行了横断面调查,以确定和描述与工作中死亡、伤害和疾病相关的因素,并确定工人的健康和安全问题。工人受雇于服务公司 (271/472,57.4%)、钻井承包商 (106/472,22.5%) 和运营商 (95/472,20.1%)。接触有害物质的可能性因物质和公司类型而异。钻井和服务员工自我报告接触管道涂料 (OR = 10.07, 95% CI: 1.74-63.64; OR = 5.95, 95% CI: 2.18-18.34)、柴油废气 (OR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.15-5.05; OR = 4.93, 95% CI: 2.73-10.32) 和钻井泥浆 (OR = 24.36, 95% CI: 4.45-144.69; OR = 3.48, 95% CI: 1.24-12.20) 的可能性明显高于运营商。工人普遍报告了安全政策、计划和培训,尽管针对特定物质的培训(例如,可吸入结晶硅危害)则不太常见。自我报告的雇主对 PPE 的要求以及工人在需要或需要安全时使用 PPE 的差异突出表明需要采取新策略来提高 PPE 的使用。总的来说,这项研究强调了公司类型不同的工作条件差异,并揭示了雇主行政控制和 PPE 使用方面的差距。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Is diesel equipment in the workplace safe or not?工作场所中的柴油设备是否安全?
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Dec;73(12):846-848. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-103977. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验