Meadow Jacqueline, Arzu Jennifer, Rychlik Karen, Henner Natalia
Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e794-e802. doi: 10.1055/a-1941-4285. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
This study aimed to establish the degree of variability in thresholds for discussing withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WLST) in periviable infants among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) personnel.
A vignette-style survey was administered to NICU personnel at two urban NICUs assessing likelihood of discussing WLST or support for discussing WLST (on a scale from 1, not at all likely/supportive to 10, extremely likely/supportive) in 10 clinical scenarios.
Response rates ranged by clinical role from 26 to 89%. Participant responses ranged from 1 to 10 in 5 out of 10 vignettes for NICU attendings, and 9 out of 10 vignettes for bedside nurses. Lower gestational age (22-23 vs. 24-25 weeks) was associated with increased likelihood to discuss WLST in some but not all scenarios.
NICU personnel have widely variable criteria for discussing WLST which threatens the informed consent process surrounding resuscitation decisions in a "trial of therapy" framework.
· NICU personnel have variable criteria for WLST.. · Parents have little say in whether WLST is offered.. · Disclosure of variable criteria is not routine..
本研究旨在确定新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)工作人员对可存活孕周边缘婴儿讨论撤除维持生命治疗(WLST)阈值的变异程度。
对两家城市NICU的NICU工作人员进行了一项 vignette 式调查,评估在10种临床场景中讨论WLST或支持讨论WLST的可能性(范围为1,完全不可能/不支持至10,极有可能/支持)。
按临床角色划分的回复率在26%至89%之间。对于NICU主治医师,在10个 vignette 中有5个的参与者回复范围为1至10;对于床边护士,在10个 vignette 中有9个是这样。较低的孕周(22 - 23周与24 - 25周)在某些但并非所有场景中与讨论WLST的可能性增加相关。
NICU工作人员在讨论WLST方面有广泛不同的标准,这威胁到“治疗试验”框架下围绕复苏决策的知情同意过程。
· NICU工作人员对WLST有不同标准。· 父母在是否提供WLST方面几乎没有发言权。· 不同标准的披露并非惯例。