• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孟加拉国一项大规模水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施对知识、行为和健康的影响:终线方案评价结果。

The effect of a large-scale water, sanitation and hygiene intervention in Bangladesh on knowledge, behaviour and health: Findings from an endline programme evaluation.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2022 Oct;27(10):913-924. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13813. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1111/tmi.13813
PMID:36096154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9826406/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Sanitation, Hygiene Education and Water Supply in Bangladesh Programme (SHEWA-B) was a 5-year intervention aiming to improve water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) practices among 20 million rural residents through community hygiene promoters. This analysis evaluates the impact of SHEWA-B on knowledge, behaviour and childhood diarrhoea outcomes.

METHODS

The evaluation included repeated cross-sectional surveys and health surveillance in matched cohorts in intervention and control clusters. Cross-sectional surveys and structured observations at baseline, midline, and endline assessed the availability of WASH technology, caregiver knowledge and behaviour. Fieldworkers collected monthly health data in a subset of control and intervention households to determine the prevalence of diarrhoea.

RESULTS

Of 5091 households surveyed, participants residing in intervention clusters showed minimal improvements in knowledge, reported behaviour, or use of WASH technology compared to the control clusters. During structured observations, intervention households increased more than control households at handwashing before preparing food and after cleaning a baby's anus when comparing endline to baseline, but these changes were not seen when comparing endline to the midline. The prevalence of childhood diarrhoea remained similar in both groups before (10.2% in intervention, 10.0% in control) and after (8.8% in intervention, 11.7% in control) midline changes were made to improve the intervention. Intervention clusters showed no improvement in diarrhoea over time compared to control clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

SHEWA-B's community-based WASH promotion did not yield the intended impact on knowledge, behaviour or health. Greater priority should be given to approaches that have demonstrated effectiveness. Including rigorous evaluations would broaden the evidence base to support and improve large-scale programmes.

摘要

目的

孟加拉国环境卫生、个人卫生和供水促进项目(SHEWA-B)是一个为期五年的干预项目,旨在通过社区卫生促进者改善 2000 万农村居民的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)习惯。本分析评估了 SHEWA-B 对知识、行为和儿童腹泻结局的影响。

方法

评估包括在干预和对照群组中进行重复的横断面调查和健康监测。在基线、中程和终线进行横断面调查和结构观察,评估 WASH 技术、照顾者知识和行为的可得性。野外工作人员在对照和干预家庭的子集中每月收集健康数据,以确定腹泻的患病率。

结果

在接受调查的 5091 户家庭中,与对照群组相比,居住在干预群组的参与者在知识、报告的行为或 WASH 技术的使用方面仅略有改善。在结构观察中,与基线相比,干预家庭在手接触食物前和清洁婴儿肛门后洗手的次数增加多于对照家庭,但在与中程线相比时,这些变化并未出现。在进行中程线改变以改善干预措施之前(干预组为 10.2%,对照组为 10.0%)和之后(干预组为 8.8%,对照组为 11.7%),两组儿童腹泻的患病率相似。与对照组相比,干预组在整个研究期间的腹泻率没有改善。

结论

SHEWA-B 的基于社区的 WASH 促进措施并未对知识、行为或健康产生预期影响。应更加重视已证明有效的方法。包括严格的评估将扩大证据基础,以支持和改进大规模计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e1/9826406/d8e5a37c2d0c/TMI-27-913-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e1/9826406/f69d50c7ef52/TMI-27-913-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e1/9826406/ac69e2a5da21/TMI-27-913-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e1/9826406/d8e5a37c2d0c/TMI-27-913-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e1/9826406/f69d50c7ef52/TMI-27-913-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e1/9826406/ac69e2a5da21/TMI-27-913-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e1/9826406/d8e5a37c2d0c/TMI-27-913-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of a large-scale water, sanitation and hygiene intervention in Bangladesh on knowledge, behaviour and health: Findings from an endline programme evaluation.孟加拉国一项大规模水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施对知识、行为和健康的影响:终线方案评价结果。
Trop Med Int Health. 2022 Oct;27(10):913-924. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13813. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
2
Effectiveness of a community-based water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) intervention in reduction of diarrhoea among under-five children: Evidence from a repeated cross-sectional study (2007-2015) in rural Bangladesh.基于社区的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)干预措施对减少五岁以下儿童腹泻的效果:来自孟加拉国农村地区一项重复横断面研究(2007-2015 年)的证据。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 Sep;222(8):1098-1108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
3
Interim evaluation of a large scale sanitation, hygiene and water improvement programme on childhood diarrhea and respiratory disease in rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区大规模环境卫生、个人卫生和水改善方案对儿童腹泻和呼吸道疾病的中期评估。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Aug;75(4):604-11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.042. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
4
Achieving optimal technology and behavioral uptake of single and combined interventions of water, sanitation hygiene and nutrition, in an efficacy trial (WASH benefits) in rural Bangladesh.在孟加拉国农村进行的一项效果试验(水、环境卫生与个人卫生促进项目)中,实现水、环境卫生、个人卫生和营养单一及联合干预措施的最佳技术应用和行为改变。
Trials. 2018 Jul 6;19(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2710-8.
5
Interventions promoting uptake of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) technologies in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies.促进低收入和中等收入国家采用水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)技术的干预措施:有效性研究的证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;17(4):e1194. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1194. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Changes in water treatment, hygiene practices, household floors, and child health in times of Covid-19: A longitudinal cross-sectional survey in Surkhet District, Nepal.新冠疫情期间水疗、卫生习惯、家庭地板和儿童健康的变化:尼泊尔苏尔凯特地区的纵向横断面调查。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023 Apr;249:114138. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114138. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
7
Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Bangladesh: a cluster randomised controlled trial.水质、环境卫生、手卫生和营养干预对孟加拉国农村地区腹泻和儿童生长的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e302-e315. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30490-4. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
8
Lot quality assurance sampling survey for water, sanitation and hygiene monitoring and evidence-based advocacy in Bentiu IDP camp, South Sudan.在南苏丹本提乌境内流离失所者营地开展水质、环境卫生和个人卫生监测以及循证宣传的批量质量保证抽样调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 15;19(7):e0302712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302712. eCollection 2024.
9
Effects of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) education on childhood intestinal parasitic infections in rural Dembiya, northwest Ethiopia: an uncontrolled before-and-after intervention study.水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)教育对埃塞俄比亚西北部 Dembiya 农村儿童肠道寄生虫感染的影响:一项无对照前后干预研究。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2019 Mar 9;24(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12199-019-0774-z.
10
The effect of handwashing at recommended times with water alone and with soap on child diarrhea in rural Bangladesh: an observational study.仅用水和用肥皂在推荐时间洗手对孟加拉国农村儿童腹泻的影响:一项观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2011 Jun;8(6):e1001052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001052. Epub 2011 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of measures taken by governments to support hand hygiene in community settings: a systematic review.政府为支持社区环境中手部卫生所采取措施的有效性:一项系统综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Sep 16;10(Suppl 7):e018929. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-018929.
2
Assessment of water, hygiene, and sanitation practice and associated factors among Bihari refugee camp in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study.孟加拉国比哈里难民营的水、卫生和环境卫生实践及相关因素评估:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 27;7(2):e1910. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1910. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Mass Media Campaigns to Improve Handwashing-Related Behavior, Knowledge, and Practices in Rural Bangladesh.大众媒体宣传活动对改善孟加拉国农村地区手卫生相关行为、知识和实践的效果。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jan 18;104(4):1546-1553. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1154.
2
Ingestion of Fecal Bacteria along Multiple Pathways by Young Children in Rural Bangladesh Participating in a Cluster-Randomized Trial of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions (WASH Benefits).孟加拉国农村地区参与水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施(WASH 效益)集群随机试验的幼儿通过多种途径摄入粪便细菌。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Nov 3;54(21):13828-13838. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02606. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
3
Factors associated with diarrhea and acute respiratory infection in children under two years of age in rural Bangladesh.
孟加拉国农村地区两岁以下儿童腹泻和急性呼吸道感染相关因素分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Oct 27;19(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1738-6.
4
Correction to: Age-related changes to environmental exposure: variation in the frequency that young children place hands and objects in their mouths.对《环境暴露的年龄相关变化:幼儿将手和物体放入口中的频率差异》的修正
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;30(4):769-772. doi: 10.1038/s41370-019-0160-3.
5
Effect of Two Complementary Mass-Scale Media Interventions on Handwashing with Soap among Mothers.两种补充大规模媒体干预措施对母亲用肥皂洗手的影响。
J Health Commun. 2019;24(2):203-215. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1593554. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
6
Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoea in 195 countries: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.估计 195 个国家的全球、区域和国家腹泻发病率、死亡率和病因:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Nov;18(11):1211-1228. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30362-1. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
7
Impact of drinking water, sanitation and handwashing with soap on childhood diarrhoeal disease: updated meta-analysis and meta-regression.饮用水、环境卫生和用肥皂洗手对儿童腹泻病的影响:更新的荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 May;23(5):508-525. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13051. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
8
Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Bangladesh: a cluster randomised controlled trial.水质、环境卫生、手卫生和营养干预对孟加拉国农村地区腹泻和儿童生长的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e302-e315. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30490-4. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
9
Economic costs of hospitalized diarrheal disease in Bangladesh: a societal perspective.孟加拉国住院腹泻病的经济成本:社会视角
Glob Health Res Policy. 2018 Jan 5;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s41256-017-0056-5. eCollection 2018.
10
Sustained adoption of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions: systematic review.持续采用水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施:系统评价。
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Feb;23(2):122-135. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13011. Epub 2017 Dec 8.