Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
J Pain. 2022 Dec;23(12):2121-2134. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
Despite the popularity and affordances of social media groups for people with chronic conditions, there have been few controlled tests of the effects of these groups. This randomized controlled superiority trial examined the effects of Facebook groups on pain-related outcomes and tested whether a professional-led group leads to greater effects than a support group alone. We randomly assigned 119 adults with chronic pain to one of two Facebook group conditions: a standard condition (n = 60) in which participants were instructed to offer mutual support, or a professional-led condition (n = 59) in which the investigators disseminated empirically-supported, socially-oriented psychological interventions. Four groups were run (2 standard, 2 professional-led), each lasting 4 weeks and containing approximately 30 participants. Measures were administered at baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up. Across conditions, participants improved significantly in primary outcomes (pain severity and interference; medium-large effects) and a secondary outcome (depressive symptoms; small-medium effect), and they retained their outcomes 1 month after the groups ended. The 2 conditions did not differ on improvements. Overall, this study supports the use of social media groups as an additional tool to improve chronic pain-related outcomes. Our findings suggest that professional intervention may not have added value in these groups and that peer support alone may be driving improvements. Alternatively, the psychosocial intervention components used in the current study might have been ineffective, or more therapist direction may be warranted. Future research should examine when and how such guidance could enhance outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: Findings from this randomized trial support the use of both standard and professional-led Facebook groups as an accessible tool to enhance the lives of adults with chronic pain. This article provides direction for how to improve social media groups to optimize outcomes and satisfaction for more users.
尽管社交媒体群组对慢性病患者来说具有普及性和实用性,但针对这些群组效果的对照试验却很少。本随机对照优势试验检验了 Facebook 群组对疼痛相关结果的影响,并测试了专业指导群组是否比单纯的支持群组产生更大的效果。我们将 119 名慢性疼痛患者随机分配到两个 Facebook 群组条件之一:标准条件(n=60),参与者被指示提供相互支持;或专业指导条件(n=59),研究人员传播经过实证支持、面向社交的心理干预措施。运行了四个小组(2 个标准,2 个专业指导),每个小组持续 4 周,包含大约 30 名参与者。在基线、干预后和 1 个月随访时进行测量。在所有条件下,参与者在主要结果(疼痛严重程度和干扰;中到大效应)和次要结果(抑郁症状;小到中效应)方面均有显著改善,并且在小组结束后 1 个月仍保持其结果。两种条件在改善方面没有差异。总体而言,这项研究支持将社交媒体群组用作改善慢性疼痛相关结果的附加工具。我们的研究结果表明,专业干预在这些群组中可能没有附加价值,而仅提供同伴支持可能是改善的原因。或者,当前研究中使用的心理社会干预措施可能无效,或者需要更多的治疗师指导。未来的研究应该探讨何时以及如何提供这种指导可以增强结果。观点:这项随机试验的结果支持将标准和专业指导的 Facebook 群组用作增强慢性疼痛成年人生活的一种便捷工具。本文为如何改进社交媒体群组以优化更多用户的结果和满意度提供了指导。