Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
J ISAKOS. 2022 Dec;7(6):162-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
The ideal graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) continues to be debated. Although first described in 1984, use of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has only recently gained popularity. The biomechanical properties of the QT autograft are favourable compared to bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and doubled hamstring (HS) grafts with a higher load to failure and a modulus of elasticity that more closely approximates the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The QT graft can be harvested with or without a bone plug, as either a full thickness or a partial thickness graft, and even through minimally invasive techniques. The surgeon must be aware of potential harvest risks including patellar fracture or a graft that is of insufficient length. Numerous short-term studies have shown comparable results when compared to BPTB or hamstring HS autografts with similar graft failure rates, patient-reported outcomes. A major advantage of QT ACLR is reduced donor site morbidity compared to BPTB. However, some persistent quadriceps weakness after QT ACLR has also been reported. The current literature shows that use of the QT autograft for ACLR provides equivalent clinical results compared to other autografts with less donor site morbidity. However, future studies with longer follow-up and higher level of evidence are needed to identify specific populations where the QT may have additional advantage.
用于前交叉韧带重建(ACL)的理想移植物仍存在争议。尽管四头肌腱(QT)自体移植物于 1984 年首次被描述,但最近才开始流行。与骨-髌腱-骨(BPTB)和双股半腱肌(HS)移植物相比,QT 自体移植物具有更好的生物力学特性,其失效负荷更高,弹性模量更接近天然前交叉韧带(ACL)。QT 移植物可以带或不带骨栓,作为全厚或部分厚度移植物,甚至可以通过微创技术进行采集。外科医生必须意识到潜在的采集风险,包括髌骨骨折或移植物长度不足。大量短期研究表明,与 BPTB 或 HS 自体移植物相比,QT 自体移植物具有相似的移植物失败率和患者报告的结果,具有可比的结果。QT ACLR 的一个主要优点是与 BPTB 相比,减少了供体部位的发病率。然而,也有报道称 QT ACLR 后存在持续的股四头肌无力。目前的文献表明,与其他自体移植物相比,QT 自体移植物用于 ACLR 可提供等效的临床结果,且供体部位发病率较低。然而,需要进行具有更长随访时间和更高证据水平的未来研究,以确定 QT 可能具有额外优势的特定人群。