• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养老院中预先医疗照护计划干预的描述:过程评估结果。

Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation.

机构信息

Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O. Box: 7804, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Nursing Home Medicine, Municipality of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0713-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-018-0713-7
PMID:29370766
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5785831/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advance Care Planning (ACP) is the repeated communication and decision-making process between the patient, family, and healthcare professionals. This study describes an ACP intervention in nursing homes and evaluates the outcomes of the implementation process.

METHODS

The ACP intervention was part of a 4-month complex, cluster randomized controlled trial (COSMOS). 37 Norwegian nursing homes with 72 units (1 cluster = 1 unit) and 765 patients were invited to participate and eligible units were randomised to the intervention group or control. Nursing home staff in the intervention group was offered a standardized education programme to learn early and repeated communication with patients and families and to implement ACP in their units. We used a train-the-trainer approach to educate staff in the units, supported by regular telephone calls and a midway seminar after two months. Individual patient logs consisting of different communication deliverables were used to evaluate the implementation process. Supported by Qualitative Content Analyses, we identified facilitators and barriers of the ACP implementation based on feedback during midway seminars and individual patient logs.

RESULTS

The ACP intervention was conducted in 36 NH units (n = 297); 105 healthcare providers participated at the education seminar prior to the study, and 3-4 employees from each unit participated in the midway seminar. NH staff reported the educational material relevant for the implementation strategy. The patient logs showed that ACP was successfully implemented in 62% (n = 183) of the patients using our predefined implementation criteria. The staff emphasized the clear communication of the relevance of ACP addressed to leaders and staff as important facilitators, along with the clearly defined routines, roles and responsibilities. Identified barriers included lack of competence, perceived lack of time, and conflicting culture and staff opinions.

CONCLUSION

Monthly communication with the family was the most frequently conducted communication, and the predefined criteria of successfully implemented ACP were largely achieved. Nursing home routines and engagement of leaders and staff were crucial facilitators, whereas lack of time and competence reduced the implementation success.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The COSMOS-trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02238652 ) July 7th, 2014.

摘要

背景

预先医疗照护计划(ACP)是患者、家属和医疗保健专业人员之间反复进行的沟通和决策过程。本研究描述了疗养院中的 ACP 干预措施,并评估了实施过程的结果。

方法

ACP 干预措施是为期 4 个月的复杂、集群随机对照试验(COSMOS)的一部分。37 家挪威疗养院的 72 个单元(1 个集群=1 个单元)和 765 名患者受邀参加,符合条件的单元被随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预组的疗养院工作人员接受了标准化的教育计划,以学习与患者和家属进行早期和反复的沟通,并在其单元中实施 ACP。我们采用培训师培训方法对单元中的工作人员进行教育,通过定期电话和两个月后的中途研讨会提供支持。使用不同沟通可交付成果的个人患者日志来评估实施过程。根据中途研讨会和个人患者日志中的反馈,我们通过定性内容分析确定了 ACP 实施的促进因素和障碍。

结果

ACP 干预措施在 36 个 NH 单元(n=297)中进行;105 名医疗保健提供者参加了研究前的教育研讨会,每个单元有 3-4 名员工参加了中途研讨会。NH 工作人员报告说,教育材料与实施策略相关。患者日志显示,根据我们预先定义的实施标准,62%(n=183)的患者成功实施了 ACP。工作人员强调,向领导和工作人员明确传达 ACP 的相关性是重要的促进因素,同时明确规定了常规、角色和责任。确定的障碍包括缺乏能力、认为缺乏时间以及文化和员工意见冲突。

结论

每月与家属沟通是最常进行的沟通方式,并且成功实施 ACP 的预定标准在很大程度上得到了实现。疗养院的常规程序以及领导和工作人员的参与是至关重要的促进因素,而缺乏时间和能力则降低了实施的成功。

试验注册

COSMOS 试验于 2014 年 7 月 7 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02238652)注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d33/5785831/3e230caa04d5/12877_2018_713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d33/5785831/3e230caa04d5/12877_2018_713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d33/5785831/3e230caa04d5/12877_2018_713_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation.养老院中预先医疗照护计划干预的描述:过程评估结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0713-7.
2
Implementing advance care planning in nursing homes - study protocol of a cluster-randomized clinical trial.在养老院实施预先医疗照护计划 - 一项群组随机临床试验研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0869-1.
3
Advance Care Planning in Nursing Homes - Improving the Communication Among Patient, Family, and Staff: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (COSMOS).养老院中的预先护理计划——改善患者、家属和工作人员之间的沟通:一项整群随机对照试验(COSMOS)的结果
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 4;9:2284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02284. eCollection 2018.
4
Implementing the theory-based advance care planning ACP+ programme for nursing homes: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation.实施基于理论的养老机构预先医疗照护计划(ACP+)方案:一项群组随机对照试验及过程评价的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jan 8;19(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0505-7.
5
COSMOS--improving the quality of life in nursing home patients: protocol for an effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized clinical hybrid trial.COSMOS——改善养老院患者的生活质量:一项有效性-实施性整群随机临床混合试验方案
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 15;10:131. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0310-5.
6
Implementing a novel strategy for interprofessional medication review using collegial mentoring and systematic clinical evaluation in nursing homes (COSMOS).在养老院实施一种使用同行指导和系统临床评估的跨专业药物审查新策略(COSMOS)。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 May 7;19(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1139-6.
7
Effectiveness of a complex regional advance care planning intervention to improve care consistency with care preferences: study protocol for a multi-center, cluster-randomized controlled trial focusing on nursing home residents (BEVOR trial).一项复杂的区域预先医疗照护计划干预措施以提高与照护偏好的一致性的效果:一项多中心、整群随机对照试验的研究方案,重点关注养老院居民(BEVOR 试验)。
Trials. 2022 Sep 12;23(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06576-3.
8
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a pragmatic trial to improve advance care planning in the nursing home setting.实施一项实用临床试验以改善养老院环境中的预先护理计划的障碍和促进因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4309-5.
9
'We DECide optimized' - training nursing home staff in shared decision-making skills for advance care planning conversations in dementia care: protocol of a pretest-posttest cluster randomized trial.“我们决定优化”——培训养老院工作人员在痴呆症护理中进行预先护理计划谈话的共同决策技能:一项预试验后测试的群组随机试验方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Feb 4;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1044-z.
10
Advance care planning for nursing home residents with dementia: Influence of 'we DECide' on policy and practice.为患有痴呆症的养老院居民进行预先护理规划:“我们做决定”对政策和实践的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jan;100(1):139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators of advance care planning practices in multi-disciplinary, multi-facility palliative care for Japan's aging population: A qualitative analysis.日本老年人口多学科、多机构姑息治疗中预先护理计划实践的障碍与促进因素:一项定性分析
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0323976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323976. eCollection 2025.
2
Proactive end-of-life conversations in residential care homes: a qualitative interview study exploring residents' and family members' experiences.养老院中的积极临终关怀对话:一项探索居民及其家庭成员经历的定性访谈研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05916-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care.预先医疗照护计划的定义和建议:欧洲缓和医疗协会支持的国际共识。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e543-e551. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X.
2
The Liverpool Care Pathway: discarded in cancer patients but good enough for dying nursing home patients? A systematic review.利物浦护理路径:在癌症患者中被弃用,但对临终养老院患者就足够好了吗?一项系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Aug 9;18(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0205-x.
3
Advance care planning in Norwegian nursing homes.
Extending Integration: Interventions Supporting Communication and Collaboration Between Patients with Neurological Diseases, Their Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Staff - a Scoping Review.
拓展整合:支持神经疾病患者、其非正式照料者与医护人员之间沟通与协作的干预措施——一项范围综述
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Jan 28;25(1):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8577. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
4
Process evaluation of an individually tailored complex intervention to improve activities and participation of older nursing home residents with joint contractures (JointConEval): a mixed-methods study.一项针对改善患有关节挛缩的老年养老院居民活动能力和参与度的个性化综合干预措施的过程评估(JointConEval):一项混合方法研究。
Trials. 2024 Dec 18;25(1):831. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08652-2.
5
Long-Term Effects of Individual-Focused and Team-Based Training on Health Professionals' Intention to Have Serious Illness Conversations: A Cluster Randomised Trial.以个体为中心和基于团队的培训对卫生专业人员进行严重疾病谈话意愿的长期影响:一项整群随机试验。
J CME. 2024 Nov 3;13(1):2420475. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2024.2420475. eCollection 2024.
6
Public attitudes to emergency care treatment plans: a population survey of Great Britain.公众对急救治疗方案的态度:英国的一项人口调查。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 23;14(9):e080162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080162.
7
Dying at "home" - a qualitative study of end-of-life care in rural Northern Norway from the perspective of health care professionals.在挪威北部农村地区,从医疗保健专业人员的角度来看临终关怀的定性研究:在“家里”去世。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 5;23(1):1359. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10329-6.
8
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
9
Who should talk with patients about their end-of-life care wishes? A nationwide survey of the Hungarian population.谁应该与患者谈论他们的临终关怀意愿?一项针对匈牙利人口的全国性调查。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Mar;40(1):157-164. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2057055. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
10
Use, usability, and impact of a card-based conversation tool to support communication about end-of-life preferences in residential elder care - a qualitative study of staff experiences.卡片式对话工具在支持老年住宅中关于临终偏好沟通方面的使用、可用性和影响——对工作人员经验的定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02915-w.
挪威养老院的预立医疗照护计划
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017 Mar 21;137(6):447-450. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0284. eCollection 2017 Mar.
4
Preconditions for successful advance care planning in nursing homes: A systematic review.养老院中成功的预先医疗护理计划的前提条件:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jan;66:47-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
5
Shared decision-making in dementia care planning: barriers and facilitators in two European countries.痴呆症护理规划中的共同决策:两个欧洲国家的障碍与促进因素
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Jan;21(1):31-39. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1255715. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
"I just think that we should be informed" a qualitative study of family involvement in advance care planning in nursing homes.“我只是认为我们应该被告知”:一项关于养老院中家庭参与预先护理计划的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 10;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0156-7.
7
Challenges in implementing an advance care planning programme in long-term care.在长期护理中实施预先护理计划项目面临的挑战。
Nurs Ethics. 2017 Feb;24(1):87-99. doi: 10.1177/0969733016664969. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
8
Staff Distress Improves by Treating Pain in Nursing Home Patients With Dementia: Results From a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.通过治疗痴呆症养老院患者的疼痛来改善工作人员的困扰:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Dec;52(6):795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
9
The Effects of Advance Care Planning Interventions on Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review.预先护理计划干预对养老院居民的影响:一项系统评价
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Apr 1;17(4):284-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
10
The feasibility of a train-the-trainer approach to end of life care training in care homes: an evaluation.养老院临终关怀培训中培训师培训方法的可行性:一项评估
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 22;15:11. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0081-z.